Orme Mark W, Weedon Amie E, Saukko Paula M, Esliger Dale W, Morgan Mike D, Steiner Michael C, Downey John W, Sherar Lauren B, Singh Sally J
Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Leicester, United Kingdom.
National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 11;6(4):e84. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9398.
Targeting sedentary time post exacerbation may be more relevant than targeting structured exercise for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Focusing interventions on sitting less and moving more after an exacerbation may act as a stepping stone to increase uptake to pulmonary rehabilitation.
The aim of this paper was to conduct a randomized trial examining trial feasibility and the acceptability of an education and self-monitoring intervention using wearable technology to reduce sedentary behavior for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to hospital for an acute exacerbation.
Participants were recruited and randomized in hospital into 3 groups, with the intervention lasting 2 weeks post discharge. The Education group received verbal and written information about reducing their time in sedentary behavior, sitting face-to-face with a study researcher. The Education+Feedback group received the same education component along with real-time feedback on their sitting time, stand-ups, and steps at home through a waist-worn inclinometer linked to an app. Patients were shown how to use the technology by the same study researcher. The inclinometer also provided vibration prompts to encourage movement at patient-defined intervals of time. Patients and health care professionals involved in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation care were interviewed to investigate trial feasibility and acceptability of trial design and methods. Main quantitative outcomes of trial feasibility were eligibility, uptake, and retention, and for acceptability, were behavioral responses to the vibration prompts.
In total, 111 patients were approached with 33 patients recruited (11 Control, 10 Education, and 12 Education+Feedback). Retention at 2-week follow-up was 52% (17/33; n=6 for Control, n=3 for Education, and n=8 for Education+Feedback). No study-related adverse events occurred. Collectively, patients responded to 106 out of 325 vibration prompts from the waist-worn inclinometer (32.62%). Within 5 min of the prompt, 41% of responses occurred, with patients standing for a mean 1.4 (SD 0.8) min and walking for 0.4 (SD 0.3) min (21, SD 11, steps). Interviews indicated that being unwell and overwhelmed after an exacerbation was the main reason for not engaging with the intervention. Health care staff considered reducing sedentary behavior potentially attractive for patients but suggested starting the intervention as an inpatient.
Although the data support that it was feasible to conduct the trial, modifications are needed to improve participant retention. The intervention was acceptable to most patients and health care professionals.
International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 13790881; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13790881 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xmnRGjFf).
对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,在病情加重后针对久坐时间进行干预可能比针对有组织的运动更为重要。将干预重点放在病情加重后减少久坐并增加活动量,可能会成为提高肺康复参与度的垫脚石。
本文旨在进行一项随机试验,以检验使用可穿戴技术进行教育和自我监测干预以减少因急性加重而住院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐行为的试验可行性和可接受性。
在医院招募参与者并将其随机分为3组,干预在出院后持续2周。教育组通过与研究人员面对面交流,获得关于减少久坐时间的口头和书面信息。教育+反馈组除了接受相同的教育内容外,还通过与应用程序相连的腰部倾斜仪获得在家中久坐时间、站立次数和步数的实时反馈。同一位研究人员向患者展示如何使用该技术。倾斜仪还会在患者设定的时间间隔提供振动提示以鼓励活动。对参与慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重护理的患者和医护人员进行访谈,以调查试验可行性以及试验设计和方法的可接受性。试验可行性的主要定量结果是合格性、参与率和保留率,可接受性方面的结果是对振动提示的行为反应。
总共接触了111名患者,招募了33名患者(11名对照组、10名教育组和12名教育+反馈组)。2周随访时的保留率为52%(17/33;对照组6名,教育组3名,教育+反馈组8名)。未发生与研究相关的不良事件。总体而言,患者对腰部倾斜仪发出的325次振动提示中的106次做出了反应(32.百分之62)。在提示发出后的5分钟内,41%的反应发生,患者站立平均1.4(标准差0.8)分钟,行走0.4(标准差0.3)分钟(21步,标准差11步)。访谈表明,病情加重后身体不适和不堪重负是不参与干预的主要原因。医护人员认为减少久坐行为对患者可能有吸引力,但建议在住院期间开始干预。
尽管数据支持进行该试验是可行的,但需要进行改进以提高参与者的保留率。该干预对大多数患者和医护人员来说是可接受的。
国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)13790881;http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13790881(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6xmnRGjFf)。