Gariel J C, Rollinger F, Schneider T
a Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety, 31 rue de l'écluse BP 40035, 78116 Le Vésinet, Cedex, France.
b Centre d'Etude sur l'Evaluation de la Protection dans le Domaine du Nucléaire, France.
Ann ICRP. 2018 Oct;47(3-4):254-259. doi: 10.1177/0146645318756821. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
Following a nuclear accident, a major dilemma for affected people is whether to stay or leave the affected area, or, for those who have been evacuated, whether or not to return to the decontaminated zones. Populations who have to make such decisions have to consider many parameters, one of which is the radiological situation. Feedback from Chernobyl and Fukushima has demonstrated that involvement and empowerment of the affected population is a way to provide them with the necessary elements to make informed decisions and, if they decide to return to decontaminated areas, to minimise exposure by contributing to the development of a prudent attitude and vigilance towards exposure. However, involving stakeholders in postaccident management raises the question of the role of experts and public authorities in supporting the inhabitants who have to make decisions about their future. Based on experiences in Chernobyl and Fukushima, this paper will discuss various principles that have to be taken into account by experts and public authorities about their role and position when dealing with stakeholders in a postaccident recovery process.
核事故发生后,受灾民众面临的一个主要困境是是留在还是离开受灾地区,或者,对于那些已被疏散的人来说,是否返回已进行去污处理的区域。必须做出此类决定的人群需要考虑许多因素,其中之一就是放射状况。切尔诺贝利和福岛事件的反馈表明,让受影响民众参与并赋予其权力,是为他们提供做出明智决策所需要素的一种方式,并且,如果他们决定返回已去污区域,通过促使他们养成谨慎态度并对辐射保持警惕,可将辐射暴露降至最低。然而,让利益相关者参与事故后管理引发了一个问题,即专家和公共当局在支持那些必须就自身未来做出决策的居民方面应发挥何种作用。基于切尔诺贝利和福岛的经验,本文将讨论专家和公共当局在事故后恢复过程中与利益相关者打交道时,在其角色和立场方面必须考虑的各种原则。