• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管切除术后中远期急诊科利用情况:基于人群的分析。

Medium and long-term emergency department utilization after oesophagectomy: a population-based analysis.

机构信息

Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):683-688. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy155.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezy155
PMID:29648637
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Oesophagectomy is a complex operation with the potential for prolonged recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate healthcare resource utilization, specifically emergency department (ED) visits within 1 year of oesophagectomy, and to identify risk factors for ED visits and frequent ED use (FEDU).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive oesophagectomies for cancer in all Ontario hospitals was conducted using linked health data (2000-2012) including the ability to identify ED visits at non-index hospitals. Ontario has a single-payer healthcare system with a population of 13.8-million people. Multivariable regression was used to identify independent factors associated with ED visits and FEDU (≥3 ED visits) within 1 year after oesophagectomy.

RESULTS

There were 3344 oesophagectomies with in-hospital mortality of 5.8% (n = 193). Of those discharged, 16.4% (n = 549), 36.0% (n = 1203) and 55.8% (n = 1866) had ED visits within 30 days, 90 days and 1 year, respectively. Higher comorbidity [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-1.11, P < 0.0001], rurality (aOR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.10-1.78, P = 0.006) and receipt of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (aOR = 2.55, 95% CI: 2.12-3.08, P < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for ED visits within 1 year of oesophagectomy. Thoracoscopic-assisted surgery was independently associated with decreased ED visits (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-0.99, P = 0.049). Eight hundred and thirteen (24.3%) patients had FEDU. Higher comorbidity (aOR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.08-1.14, P < 0.0001), rurality (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.31-2.10, P < 0.0001) and receipt of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (aOR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.93-2.93, P < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for FEDU. One health region had more ED visits (P = 0.04) and more FEDU (P = 0.001) when compared with the other regions. There were higher ED visits and FEDU in the later years of the study period (both P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ED visits are common after oesophagectomy with almost 25% of patients having ≥3 visits and >50% having ≥1 visit within 1 year of oesophagectomy. We have identified demographic, surgical and regional risk factors for the potential targeted quality improvement.

摘要

目的

食管切除术是一种复杂的手术,恢复期可能较长。本研究旨在评估医疗资源的利用情况,特别是食管切除术后 1 年内的急诊就诊情况,并确定急诊就诊和频繁急诊就诊(FEDU)的风险因素。

方法

本研究采用回顾性队列研究,使用链接健康数据(2000-2012 年)对所有安大略省医院进行了癌症食管切除术,包括在非索引医院识别急诊就诊的能力。安大略省拥有单一支付者医疗体系,人口为 1380 万。采用多变量回归分析确定与食管切除术后 1 年内急诊就诊和 FEDU(≥3 次急诊就诊)相关的独立因素。

结果

共进行了 3344 例食管切除术,院内死亡率为 5.8%(n=193)。出院后,分别有 16.4%(n=549)、36.0%(n=1203)和 55.8%(n=1866)在 30 天、90 天和 1 年内有急诊就诊。更高的合并症(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 1.08,95%置信区间[CI]:1.05-1.11,P<0.0001)、农村地区(aOR = 1.40,95%CI:1.10-1.78,P=0.006)和接受化疗和/或放疗(aOR = 2.55,95%CI:2.12-3.08,P<0.0001)是食管切除术后 1 年内急诊就诊的独立风险因素。胸腔镜辅助手术与急诊就诊减少独立相关(aOR = 0.67,95%CI:0.45-0.99,P=0.049)。813 例(24.3%)患者有 FEDU。更高的合并症(aOR = 1.11,95%CI:1.08-1.14,P<0.0001)、农村地区(aOR = 1.66,95%CI:1.31-2.10,P<0.0001)和接受化疗和/或放疗(aOR = 2.38,95%CI:1.93-2.93,P<0.0001)是 FEDU 的独立风险因素。与其他地区相比,有一个地区的急诊就诊次数(P=0.04)和 FEDU 次数(P=0.001)更多。在研究期间的后期,急诊就诊和 FEDU 次数更高(均 P<0.0001)。

结论

食管切除术后急诊就诊很常见,近 25%的患者有≥3 次就诊,≥50%的患者在食管切除术后 1 年内有≥1 次就诊。我们已经确定了潜在的有针对性的质量改进的人口统计学、手术和地区风险因素。

相似文献

1
Medium and long-term emergency department utilization after oesophagectomy: a population-based analysis.食管切除术后中远期急诊科利用情况:基于人群的分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):683-688. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy155.
2
Emergency department use is high after esophagectomy and feeding tube problems are the biggest culprit.食管切除术后急诊科就诊率较高,其中喂养管问题是最大的罪魁祸首。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;156(6):2340-2348. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.100. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
3
A cohort study examining emergency department visits and hospital admissions among people who use drugs in Ottawa, Canada.一项队列研究,调查了加拿大渥太华使用毒品人群的急诊就诊情况和住院情况。
Harm Reduct J. 2017 May 12;14(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0143-4.
4
From Emergency Department Visit to Readmission After Esophagectomy: Analysis of Burden and Risk Factors.从急诊就诊到食管癌手术后再入院:负担和危险因素分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Aug;112(2):379-386. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.11.020. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
Repeat emergency department visits by nursing home residents: a cohort study using health administrative data.养老院居民的急诊重复就诊:使用健康管理数据的队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jul 5;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0854-8.
6
Multimorbidity and healthcare utilization among home care clients with dementia in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective analysis of a population-based cohort.加拿大安大略省患有痴呆症的居家护理客户的多重疾病与医疗保健利用情况:基于人群队列的回顾性分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Mar 7;14(3):e1002249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002249. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
Incidence of Access to Ambulatory Mental Health Care Prior to a Psychiatric Emergency Department Visit Among Adults in Ontario, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年安大略省成年人在精神科急诊就诊前获得门诊心理健康护理的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215902. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5902.
8
Characteristics and predictors of adult frequent emergency department users in the United States: A systematic literature review.美国成年高频急诊患者的特征和预测因素:系统文献回顾。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;25(3):420-433. doi: 10.1111/jep.13137. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
Low Adverse Event Rates But High Emergency Department Utilization in Chest Pain Patients Treated in an Emergency Department Observation Unit.急诊科观察单元治疗的胸痛患者不良事件发生率低但急诊科利用率高。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2017 Mar;16(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000099.
10
Emergency Department Utilization after Lower Extremity Bypass for Critical Limb Ischemia.下肢旁路手术治疗严重肢体缺血后的急诊科利用率
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Esophagectomy Versus Endoscopic Resection with Adjuvant Therapy for T1b/T2 Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.T1b/T2期食管癌的食管切除术与内镜切除加辅助治疗对比:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 17;17(4):680. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040680.
2
Administrative and clinical databases: General thoracic surgery perspective on approaches and pitfalls.管理和临床数据库:胸外科视角下的方法和陷阱。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;162(4):1146-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.057. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
3
Factors associated with healthcare utilisation during first year after cancer diagnose-a population-based study.
癌症诊断后第一年医疗保健利用的相关因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Mar;30(2):e13361. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13361. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
4
Emergency Department Visits Following Suboccipital Decompression for Adult Chiari Malformation Type I.成人 Chiari 畸形 I 型后枕下减压术后急诊科就诊。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e789-e796. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.068. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
Statistical tools used for analyses of frequent users of emergency department: a scoping review.用于急诊科高频就诊者分析的统计工具:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e027750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027750.