Rubia Katya
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Mar 29;12:100. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00100. eCollection 2018.
This review focuses on the cognitive neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies and on recent clinically relevant applications such as fMRI-based diagnostic classification or neuromodulation therapies targeting fMRI deficits with neurofeedback (NF) or brain stimulation. Meta-analyses of fMRI studies of executive functions (EFs) show that ADHD patients have cognitive-domain dissociated complex multisystem impairments in several right and left hemispheric dorsal, ventral and medial fronto-cingulo-striato-thalamic and fronto-parieto-cerebellar networks that mediate cognitive control, attention, timing and working memory (WM). There is furthermore emerging evidence for abnormalities in orbital and ventromedial prefrontal and limbic areas that mediate motivation and emotion control. In addition, poor deactivation of the default mode network (DMN) suggests an abnormal interrelationship between hypo-engaged task-positive and poorly "switched off" hyper-engaged task-negative networks, both of which are related to impaired cognition. Translational cognitive neuroscience in ADHD is still in its infancy. Pattern recognition analyses have attempted to provide diagnostic classification of ADHD using fMRI data with respectable classification accuracies of over 80%. Necessary replication studies, however, are still outstanding. Brain stimulation has been tested in heterogeneously designed, small numbered proof of concept studies targeting key frontal functional impairments in ADHD. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) appears to be promising to improve ADHD symptoms and cognitive functions based on some studies, but larger clinical trials of repeated stimulation with and without cognitive training are needed to test clinical efficacy and potential costs on non-targeted functions. Only three studies have piloted NF of fMRI-based frontal dysfunctions in ADHD using fMRI or near-infrared spectroscopy, with the two larger ones finding some improvements in cognition and symptoms, which, however, were not superior to the active control conditions, suggesting potential placebo effects. Neurotherapeutics seems attractive for ADHD due to their safety and potential longer-term neuroplastic effects, which drugs cannot offer. However, they need to be thoroughly tested for short- and longer-term clinical and cognitive efficacy and their potential for individualized treatment.
本综述聚焦于基于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究的注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的认知神经科学,以及近期与临床相关的应用,如基于fMRI的诊断分类或采用神经反馈(NF)或脑刺激针对fMRI缺陷的神经调节疗法。对执行功能(EFs)的fMRI研究的荟萃分析表明,ADHD患者在几个左右半球的背侧、腹侧和内侧额-扣带-纹状体-丘脑以及额-顶-小脑网络中存在认知领域分离的复杂多系统损伤,这些网络介导认知控制、注意力、时间感知和工作记忆(WM)。此外,有新证据表明,介导动机和情绪控制的眶额和腹内侧前额叶及边缘区域存在异常。此外,默认模式网络(DMN)的去激活不足表明,任务积极网络参与不足与任务消极网络过度参与且“关闭”不良之间存在异常的相互关系,这两者均与认知受损有关。ADHD的转化认知神经科学仍处于起步阶段。模式识别分析试图利用fMRI数据对ADHD进行诊断分类,分类准确率达到80%以上,令人瞩目。然而,必要的重复研究仍未完成。脑刺激已在针对ADHD关键额叶功能损伤的设计各异、数量较少的概念验证研究中进行了测试。基于一些研究,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)似乎有望改善ADHD症状和认知功能,但需要进行更大规模的临床试验,测试重复刺激(有无认知训练)对临床疗效以及对非目标功能潜在代价的影响。只有三项研究使用fMRI或近红外光谱对ADHD中基于fMRI的额叶功能障碍进行了NF试验,其中两项规模较大的研究发现认知和症状有一些改善,但并不优于主动对照条件,提示可能存在安慰剂效应。神经治疗因其安全性和潜在的长期神经可塑性效应(这是药物所不具备的),对ADHD似乎颇具吸引力。然而,它们需要针对短期和长期的临床及认知疗效以及个体化治疗潜力进行全面测试。