University of Guelph.
Can Rev Sociol. 2018 May;55(2):211-231. doi: 10.1111/cars.12190. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
In this essay, we discuss multimedia story-making methodologies developed through Re•Vision: The Centre for Art and Social Justice that investigates the power of the arts, especially story, to positively influence decision makers in diverse sectors. Our story-making methodology brings together majority and minoritized creators to represent previously unattended experiences (e.g., around mind-body differences, queer sexuality, urban Indigenous identity, and Inuit cultural voice) with an aim to building understanding and shifting policies/practices that create barriers to social inclusion and justice. We analyze our ongoing efforts to rework our storytelling methodology, spotlighting acts of revising carried out by facilitators and researchers as they/we redefine methodological terms for each storytelling context, by researcher-storytellers as they/we rework material from our lives, and by receivers of the stories as we revise our assumptions about particular embodied histories and how they are defined within dominant cultural narratives and institutional structures. This methodology, we argue, contributes to the existing qualitative lexicon by providing innovative new approaches not only for chronicling marginalized/misrepresented experiences and critically researching selves, but also for scaffolding intersectional alliances and for imagining more just futures.
在这篇文章中,我们讨论了通过 Re•Vision:艺术与社会正义中心开发的多媒体故事制作方法,该方法研究了艺术的力量,特别是故事,如何积极影响不同领域的决策者。我们的故事制作方法将多数派和少数派创作者聚集在一起,代表以前未被关注的经验(例如,围绕身心差异、酷儿性取向、城市原住民身份和因纽特文化声音),旨在建立理解并改变那些对社会包容和正义构成障碍的政策/实践。我们分析了我们正在努力改进我们的讲故事方法,重点介绍了指导者和研究人员进行的修订行为,因为他们/我们重新定义了每个讲故事情境的方法术语,研究人员-讲故事者重新处理他们/我们生活中的材料,以及故事的接受者,因为我们修改了我们对特定具体历史的假设,以及它们在主导文化叙事和制度结构中是如何定义的。我们认为,这种方法通过提供创新的新方法,不仅为记录边缘化/代表性不足的经验和批判性研究自我做出了贡献,而且为支撑交叉联盟和想象更公正的未来做出了贡献,从而丰富了现有的定性词汇。