Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria , Victoria, British Columbia , Canada.
Human Discovery Science, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries , Vancouver, British Columbia , Canada.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Nov 1;125(5):1594-1608. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00390.2017. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
"Cross-education" is the increase in strength or functional performance of an untrained limb after unilateral training. A major limitation for clinical translation from unilateral injury includes knowledge on the minimum time for the emergence of crossed effects. Therefore, the primary purpose was to characterize the time course of bilateral strength changes during both "traditional" ( n = 11) and "daily" ( n = 8) unilateral handgrip training in neurologically intact participants. Traditional training included five sets of five maximal voluntary handgrip contractions 3 times/wk for 6 wk whereas daily training included the same number of sessions and contractions but over 18 consecutive days. Three pre- and one posttest session evaluated strength, muscle activation, and reflex excitability bilaterally. Time course information was assessed by recording handgrip force for every contraction in the trained limb and from a single contraction on every third training session in the untrained limb. Six weeks of traditional training increased handgrip strength in the trained limb after the 9th session whereas the untrained limb was stronger after the 12th session. This was accompanied by increased peak muscle activation and bilateral alterations in Hoffmann reflex excitability. Daily training revealed a similar number of sessions (15) were required to induce significant strength gains in the untrained limb (7.8% compared with 12.5%) in approximately half the duration of traditional training. Therefore, minimizing rest days may improve the efficiency of unilateral training when the trained limb is not the focus. Establishing a "dose" for the time course of adaptation to strength training is paramount for effective translation to rehabilitative interventions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Unilateral handgrip training using a "traditional" protocol (3 times/wk; 6 wk) increased strength bilaterally after 9 (trained arm) and 12 (untrained arm) sessions. "Daily" training (18 consecutive days) increased strength in the untrained limb in a similar number of training sessions, which was accomplished in approximately half the time. Within clinical populations when the focus is on the untrained limb, reducing rest days may optimize the recovery of strength.
“交叉教育”是指单侧训练后未训练肢体力量或功能表现的增加。从单侧损伤向临床转化的一个主要限制因素是对交叉效应出现的最短时间的了解。因此,主要目的是描述神经完整参与者中传统(n=11)和日常(n=8)单侧握力训练期间双侧力量变化的时程。传统训练包括 6 周内每周 3 次的 5 组 5 次最大自主握力收缩,而日常训练包括相同次数的训练和收缩,但持续 18 天。在 3 次预测试和 1 次后测试中评估双侧力量、肌肉激活和反射兴奋性。通过记录训练肢体的每一次收缩的握力和未训练肢体的每三次训练中的一次收缩的握力来评估时程信息。6 周的传统训练在第 9 次训练后增加了训练肢体的握力,而在第 12 次训练后未训练肢体更强壮。这伴随着峰值肌肉激活的增加和双侧霍夫曼反射兴奋性的改变。日常训练显示,大约在传统训练的一半时间内,需要相同数量的训练(15 次)来引起未训练肢体的显著力量增加(7.8%对 12.5%)。因此,当训练肢体不是重点时,减少休息时间可能会提高单侧训练的效率。建立适应力量训练的时程“剂量”对于有效的康复干预至关重要。新的和值得注意的是,使用“传统”方案(每周 3 次;6 周)的单侧握力训练在 9 次(训练臂)和 12 次(未训练臂)训练后双侧增加力量。“日常”训练(连续 18 天)在相似数量的训练中增加了未训练肢体的力量,这在大约一半的时间内完成。在以未训练肢体为重点的临床人群中,减少休息时间可能会优化力量的恢复。