Ireland Kierla, Parker Averil, Foster Nicholas, Penhune Virginia
Penhune Laboratory for Motor Learning and Neural Plasticity, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 5;9:426. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00426. eCollection 2018.
Measuring musical abilities in childhood can be challenging. When music training and maturation occur simultaneously, it is difficult to separate the effects of specific experience from age-based changes in cognitive and motor abilities. The goal of this study was to develop age-equivalent scores for two measures of musical ability that could be reliably used with school-aged children (7-13) with and without musical training. The children's Rhythm Synchronization Task (c-RST) and the children's Melody Discrimination Task (c-MDT) were adapted from adult tasks developed and used in our laboratories. The c-RST is a motor task in which children listen and then try to synchronize their taps with the notes of a woodblock rhythm while it plays twice in a row. The c-MDT is a perceptual task in which the child listens to two melodies and decides if the second was the same or different. We administered these tasks to 213 children in music camps (musicians, = 130) and science camps (non-musicians, = 83). We also measured children's paced tapping, non-paced tapping, and phonemic discrimination as baseline motor and auditory abilities We estimated internal-consistency reliability for both tasks, and compared children's performance to results from studies with adults. As expected, musically trained children outperformed those without music lessons, scores decreased as difficulty increased, and older children performed the best. Using non-musicians as a reference group, we generated a set of age-based z-scores, and used them to predict task performance with additional years of training. Years of lessons significantly predicted performance on both tasks, over and above the effect of age. We also assessed the relation between musician's scores on music tasks, baseline tasks, auditory working memory, and non-verbal reasoning. Unexpectedly, musician children outperformed non-musicians in two of three baseline tasks. The c-RST and c-MDT fill an important need for researchers interested in evaluating the impact of musical training in longitudinal studies, those interested in comparing the efficacy of different training methods, and for those assessing the impact of training on non-musical cognitive abilities such as language processing.
测量儿童时期的音乐能力具有挑战性。当音乐训练和成熟过程同时发生时,很难将特定经历的影响与基于年龄的认知和运动能力变化区分开来。本研究的目的是为两种音乐能力测量方法制定年龄等效分数,这些分数可可靠地用于有或没有音乐训练的学龄儿童(7 - 13岁)。儿童节奏同步任务(c - RST)和儿童旋律辨别任务(c - MDT)改编自我们实验室开发并使用的成人任务。c - RST是一项运动任务,儿童在其中聆听,然后在木鱼节奏连续播放两次时尝试使其敲击与节奏音符同步。c - MDT是一项感知任务,儿童在其中聆听两段旋律并判断第二段旋律是否相同。我们对音乐营中的213名儿童(音乐家,n = 130)和科学营中的儿童(非音乐家,n = 83)进行了这些任务测试。我们还测量了儿童的有节奏敲击、无节奏敲击和音素辨别能力,作为基线运动和听觉能力。我们估计了两项任务的内部一致性信度,并将儿童的表现与成人研究结果进行了比较。正如预期的那样,接受音乐训练的儿童表现优于未上过音乐课的儿童,分数随着难度增加而降低,年龄较大的儿童表现最佳。以非音乐家作为参照组,我们生成了一组基于年龄的z分数,并使用它们来预测经过额外几年训练后的任务表现。课程年限在年龄影响之外,显著预测了两项任务的表现。我们还评估了音乐家在音乐任务、基线任务、听觉工作记忆和非语言推理方面的分数之间的关系。出乎意料的是,在三项基线任务中的两项中,音乐家儿童的表现优于非音乐家儿童。c - RST和c - MDT满足了对纵向研究中评估音乐训练影响感兴趣的研究人员、对比较不同训练方法效果感兴趣的人员以及对评估训练对非音乐认知能力(如语言处理)影响感兴趣的人员的重要需求。