• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知偏差修正可减轻轻度智力障碍社交焦虑青少年的社交焦虑症状：一项随机对照试验。

Cognitive Bias Modification Reduces Social Anxiety Symptoms in Socially Anxious Adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129B, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Sep;48(9):3116-3126. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3579-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-018-3579-9
PMID:29680962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6096836/
Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine the effects of Cognitive Bias Modification training for Interpretation (CBM-I) in socially anxious adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities (MID). A total of 69 socially anxious adolescents with MID were randomly assigned to either a positive or a neutral control-CMB-I-training. Training included five sessions in a 3-week period, and each session consisted of 40 training items. Adolescents in the positive training group showed a significant reduction in negative interpretation bias on the two interpretation bias tasks after training compared to adolescents in the control-training group. Furthermore, in contrast to the control-training group, adolescents in the positive training reported a significant reduction of their social anxiety symptoms 10 weeks post-training.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨认知偏差修正训练对轻度智力障碍（MID）社交焦虑青少年的影响。共有 69 名患有 MID 的社交焦虑青少年被随机分配到积极或中性控制-CBM-I-训练组。训练包括在 3 周内进行 5 次课程，每次课程包括 40 个训练项目。与控制训练组相比，积极训练组的青少年在两项解释偏差任务上的负性解释偏差显著减少。此外，与控制训练组相比，积极训练组的青少年在训练后 10 周报告其社交焦虑症状显著减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ce/6096836/137bee392dee/10803_2018_3579_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ce/6096836/3950f3c978c6/10803_2018_3579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ce/6096836/f98c6e907554/10803_2018_3579_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ce/6096836/137bee392dee/10803_2018_3579_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ce/6096836/3950f3c978c6/10803_2018_3579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ce/6096836/f98c6e907554/10803_2018_3579_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02ce/6096836/137bee392dee/10803_2018_3579_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive Bias Modification Reduces Social Anxiety Symptoms in Socially Anxious Adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial.认知偏差修正可减轻轻度智力障碍社交焦虑青少年的社交焦虑症状：一项随机对照试验。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Sep;48(9):3116-3126. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3579-9.
2
Interpretation modification training reduces social anxiety in clinically anxious children.解释修正训练可减轻临床焦虑儿童的社交焦虑。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Dec;75:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
Cognitive bias modification of interpretation in children with social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍儿童解释方面的认知偏差矫正
J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Jan;45:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Nov 6.
4
The relation between social anxiety and biased interpretations in adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.社交焦虑与轻度智力障碍青少年的偏见解释之间的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Aug;67:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
5
Cognitive bias modification versus CBT in reducing adolescent social anxiety: a randomized controlled trial.认知偏差修正与认知行为疗法在减少青少年社交焦虑中的比较：一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e64355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064355. Print 2013.
6
Effects of standard and explicit cognitive bias modification and computer-administered cognitive-behaviour therapy on cognitive biases and social anxiety.标准和明确的认知偏差修正以及计算机辅助认知行为疗法对认知偏差和社交焦虑的影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;45(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
7
Cognitive bias modification and CBT as early interventions for adolescent social and test anxiety: Two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.认知偏差矫正与认知行为疗法作为青少年社交焦虑和考试焦虑的早期干预措施：一项随机对照试验的两年随访
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;55:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
8
Differences between self- and peer-rated likability in relation to social anxiety and depression in adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.轻度智力障碍青少年社交焦虑和抑郁与自评和同伴评定的可爱程度之间的差异。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Sep;80:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
9
Reducing alcohol-related interpretive bias in negative affect situations: Using a scenario-based Cognitive Bias Modification training paradigm.减少负面情绪情境下与酒精相关的解读偏差：使用基于情景的认知偏差修正训练范式。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jan;88:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
10
Modifying threat-related interpretive bias in adolescents.修改青少年与威胁相关的解释性偏见。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011 Oct;39(7):967-76. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9523-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and Course of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents With a Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disability, Inside and Outside Residential Treatment.轻度至边缘智力障碍青少年在住院治疗内外的焦虑和抑郁症状患病率及病程
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 Jul;69(7):592-604. doi: 10.1111/jir.13242. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
2
The relationships between mental health and social media addiction, and between academic burnout and social media addiction among Chinese college students: A network analysis.中国大学生心理健康与社交媒体成瘾之间以及学业倦怠与社交媒体成瘾之间的关系：一项网络分析
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 15;11(3):e41869. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41869. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Differences between self- and peer-rated likability in relation to social anxiety and depression in adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.轻度智力障碍青少年社交焦虑和抑郁与自评和同伴评定的可爱程度之间的差异。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Sep;80:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
A randomized controlled trial of multi-session online interpretation bias modification training: Short- and long-term effects on anxiety and depression in unselected adolescents.一项多轮次在线解释偏差修正训练的随机对照试验：对未经选择的青少年焦虑和抑郁的短期和长期效果。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194274. eCollection 2018.
3
Clinical Considerations for an Evidence-Based Assessment of Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents.
临床考虑因素对儿童和青少年焦虑障碍的循证评估。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2024 Dec;47(4):641-672. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 May 28.
4
Social media addiction and academic engagement as serial mediators between social anxiety and academic performance among college students.社交媒体成瘾和学术投入作为大学生社交焦虑与学业成绩之间的连续中介变量。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Apr 6;12(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01635-7.
5
Inclusiveness of cognitive bias modification research toward children and young people with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review.针对患有神经发育障碍的儿童和青少年的认知偏差矫正研究的包容性：一项系统综述。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2020 Feb 3;68(2):86-101. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2020.1720156. eCollection 2022.
6
Biased Maintenance of Attention on Sad Faces in Clinically Depressed Youth: An Eye-Tracking Study.临床抑郁青少年对悲伤面孔注意力偏向的维持：一项眼动研究。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Feb;54(1):189-201. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01229-z. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
7
Promoting helpful attention and interpretation patterns to reduce anxiety and depression in young people: weaving scientific data with young peoples' lived experiences.促进有益的注意和解释模式，以减少年轻人的焦虑和抑郁：将科学数据与年轻人的生活经历交织在一起。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 25;21(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03320-0.
8
Is interpretation bias for threat content specific to youth anxiety symptoms/diagnoses? A systematic review and meta-analysis.威胁内容的解释偏差是否特定于青少年焦虑症状/诊断？系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;31(9):1341-1352. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01740-7. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Remote W.A.R.A. Compared With Face-to-Face W.A.R.A.: A Pilot Study.远程W.A.R.A.与面对面W.A.R.A.的比较：一项初步研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 15;11:620027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620027. eCollection 2020.
10
Emotional Bias Modification in Youths with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): New Research Vista.情绪偏误修正介入对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）的青少年：新的研究视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;17(11):4028. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114028.
Confusing procedures with process when appraising the impact of cognitive bias modification on emotional vulnerability.
在评估认知偏差修正对情绪脆弱性的影响时，将程序与过程混淆。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;211(5):266-271. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.176123.
4
Research Review: Is anxiety associated with negative interpretations of ambiguity in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis.研究综述：焦虑是否与儿童和青少年对模糊性的负面解释有关？系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;59(11):1127-1142. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12822. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis.研究综述：青少年解释性认知偏差的修正及其对焦虑的影响：一项荟萃分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;59(8):831-844. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12809. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
The relation between social anxiety and biased interpretations in adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.社交焦虑与轻度智力障碍青少年的偏见解释之间的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Aug;67:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
7
Cognitive bias modification and CBT as early interventions for adolescent social and test anxiety: Two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.认知偏差矫正与认知行为疗法作为青少年社交焦虑和考试焦虑的早期干预措施：一项随机对照试验的两年随访
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;55:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
8
Resolving Ambiguity in Emotional Disorders: The Nature and Role of Interpretation Biases.解决情绪障碍中的歧义：解释偏差的性质和作用。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:281-305. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093436.
9
Interpretation modification training reduces social anxiety in clinically anxious children.解释修正训练可减轻临床焦虑儿童的社交焦虑。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Dec;75:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Attentional bias towards threatening stimuli in children with anxiety: A meta-analysis.焦虑儿童对威胁性刺激的注意偏向：一项荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;40:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 3.