Chambers Edgar, Chambers Edgar, Castro Mauricio
Center for Sensory Analysis and Consumer Behavior, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Foods. 2018 Apr 23;7(4):65. doi: 10.3390/foods7040065.
Interest in “natural” food has grown enormously over the last decade. Because the United States government has not set a legal definition for the term “natural”, customers have formed their own sensory perceptions and opinions on what constitutes natural. In this study, we examined 20 ingredients to determine what consumers consider to be natural. Using a national database, 630 consumers were sampled (50% male and 50% female) online, and the results were analyzed using percentages and chi-square tests. No ingredient was considered natural by more than 69% of respondents. We found evidence that familiarity may play a major role in consumers’ determination of naturalness. We also found evidence that chemical sounding names and the age of the consumer have an effect on whether an ingredient and potentially a food is considered natural. Interestingly, a preference towards selecting GMO (genetically modified organisms) foods had no significant impact on perceptions of natural.
在过去十年里,人们对“天然”食品的兴趣大幅增长。由于美国政府尚未对“天然”一词设定法律定义,消费者已就构成天然的要素形成了自己的感官认知和观点。在本研究中,我们检测了20种成分,以确定消费者认为什么是天然的。利用一个全国性数据库,在线抽取了630名消费者样本(50%为男性,50%为女性),并使用百分比和卡方检验对结果进行分析。没有一种成分被超过69%的受访者认为是天然的。我们发现有证据表明,熟悉程度可能在消费者对天然性的判定中起主要作用。我们还发现有证据表明,听起来像化学品的名称以及消费者的年龄会影响一种成分乃至一种食品是否被认为是天然的。有趣的是,选择转基因食品的偏好对天然认知没有显著影响。