Nachtegaal Janneke, van Langeveld Sacha A, Slootman H, Post Marcel W M
Department of Research and Development, Heliomare Rehabilitation Center, Wijk aan Zee, the Netherlands.
De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Spring;24(2):133-140. doi: 10.1310/sci2402-133.
Over the last decade, the International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets project developed a number of International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets (ISCIDS) that can be used to collect standardized information on patients with SCI. The aim of this article is to describe the process of translating the ISCIDS into Dutch and reaching consensus on a Dutch National SCI Data Set (NDD). The interrater reliability of the NDD and implementation of the NDD at eight rehabilitation centers with a specialty in rehabilitation after SCI in the Netherlands are described. NDD was implemented successfully at all eight centers. Some adaptations were made to the ISCIDS, especially to the core data set. The reliability coefficients of the NDD items were at least sufficient (mean kappa per data set ranged between .68 and .91), and mean agreement per data set ranged from 66% to 97%. Experiences from the participating centers were mainly positive as well. The main obstacle for use was thought to be the absence of a link between the local patient files and the national database, which necessitates double data entry. Although the results on interrater reliability are based on a small sample size and the assessment situation is different from the normal clinical situation, this study showed the NDD to be a useful instrument to collect standardized information on patients with SCI in the Netherlands. In the future, a connection between systems or another way to centrally collect the data is recommended to prevent double data entry and to guarantee continuation of administration of the NDD.
在过去十年中,国际脊髓损伤数据集项目开发了一些国际脊髓损伤数据集(ISCIDS),可用于收集脊髓损伤患者的标准化信息。本文旨在描述将ISCIDS翻译成荷兰语并就荷兰国家脊髓损伤数据集(NDD)达成共识的过程。文中描述了NDD在荷兰八家专门从事脊髓损伤后康复的康复中心的评分者间信度以及NDD的实施情况。NDD在所有八家中心均成功实施。对ISCIDS进行了一些调整,特别是对核心数据集。NDD项目的信度系数至少足够(每个数据集的平均卡方值在0.68至0.91之间),每个数据集的平均一致性范围为66%至97%。参与中心的反馈也主要是积极的。使用该数据集的主要障碍被认为是本地患者档案与国家数据库之间缺乏关联,这需要重复录入数据。尽管评分者间信度的结果基于小样本量,且评估情况与正常临床情况不同,但本研究表明NDD是收集荷兰脊髓损伤患者标准化信息的有用工具。未来,建议建立系统之间的连接或采用其他集中收集数据的方式,以防止重复录入数据并确保NDD管理工作的持续开展。