• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美容医生面部解剖学教学“核心教学大纲”的制定:德尔菲共识法

Development of "Core Syllabus" for Facial Anatomy Teaching to Aesthetic Physicians: A Delphi Consensus.

作者信息

Kumar Narendra, Swift Arthur, Rahman Eqram

机构信息

Postgraduate Medical Institute, Faculty of Medical Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom; and McGill University, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Mar 6;6(3):e1687. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001687. eCollection 2018 Mar.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001687
PMID:29707450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5908490/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A detailed understanding of facial anatomy, specifically the vascular framework, is crucial for delivering safe nonsurgical aesthetic procedures. To date, there is no core document based on consensus for the teaching of facial anatomy to aesthetic physicians exists. The aim of this study was to ascertain the most critical anatomical structures for avoiding disastrous complications during nonsurgical aesthetic procedures.

METHODS

After a detailed literature review, Delphi questionnaire was developed listing 154 anatomical structures of the face and neck for consensus review. Thirty-five international experts in surgical and nonsurgical facial aesthetics were invited to complete an online survey designed to rank the relevance of each anatomical element on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all important) to 4 (very important) or 5 (no opinion). Consensus for items included in the core syllabus was predefined as achieving a Cronbach's α ≥ 0.90 and an agreement score of ≥ 80%.

RESULTS

Thirty-four international experts (97.14%) completed the iterative online Delphi survey. The consensus among the specialists polled was achieved after 1 round of the survey (Cronbach's α = 0.94). The expert panel reached an agreement score of ≥ 80% on 137 of the 154 anatomical structures listed.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of this Delphi study represents an essential first step in systematizing an evidence-based facial anatomy "Core Syllabus" for the teaching of aesthetic physicians and practitioners. This "Core Syllabus" will act as a blueprint for the educators while crafting a program.

摘要

背景

对面部解剖结构,特别是血管框架有详细的了解,对于实施安全的非手术美容手术至关重要。迄今为止,尚无基于共识的面向美容医生的面部解剖学教学核心文件。本研究的目的是确定在非手术美容手术中避免灾难性并发症的最关键解剖结构。

方法

在进行详细的文献综述后,制定了德尔菲问卷,列出了面部和颈部的154个解剖结构以供共识审查。邀请了35位国际外科和非手术面部美学专家完成一项在线调查,该调查旨在根据李克特量表将每个解剖元素的相关性从1(完全不重要)到4(非常重要)或5(无意见)进行排名。核心教学大纲中包含项目的共识预先定义为达到克朗巴哈系数α≥0.90且一致率≥80%。

结果

34位国际专家(97.14%)完成了迭代在线德尔菲调查。在一轮调查后(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.94),参与投票的专家达成了共识。专家小组对列出的154个解剖结构中的137个达成了≥80%的一致率。

结论

这项德尔菲研究的结果是朝着为美容医生和从业者系统化基于证据的面部解剖学“核心教学大纲”迈出的重要第一步。这个“核心教学大纲”将在制定课程时为教育工作者提供蓝图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab9/5908490/19254f2dd700/gox-6-e1687-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab9/5908490/19254f2dd700/gox-6-e1687-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab9/5908490/19254f2dd700/gox-6-e1687-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of "Core Syllabus" for Facial Anatomy Teaching to Aesthetic Physicians: A Delphi Consensus.美容医生面部解剖学教学“核心教学大纲”的制定:德尔菲共识法
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Mar 6;6(3):e1687. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001687. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
A Core Curriculum for Postgraduate Program in Nonsurgical Aesthetics: A Cross-sectional Delphi Study.非手术美容研究生课程核心课程:一项横断面德尔菲研究。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Apr 11;4:ojac023. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac023. eCollection 2022.
3
A consensus-based framework for design, validation, and implementation of simulation-based training curricula in surgery.基于共识的外科模拟训练课程设计、验证和实施框架。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Oct;215(4):580-586.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.035. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
4
Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine: the Delphi process.本科医学解剖学会核心局部解剖学教学大纲:德尔菲法
J Anat. 2016 Jan;228(1):2-14. doi: 10.1111/joa.12402. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
A Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should be reported: stage 2 of the development of a reporting guideline.一项德尔菲调查,以确定循证实践教育干预措施应如何报告:报告指南制定的第二阶段。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jul 31;14:159. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-159.
6
Assessment of Competence in EVAR Procedures: A Novel Rating Scale Developed by the Delphi Technique.腔内血管修复术(EVAR)操作能力评估:一种通过德尔菲技术开发的新型评分量表。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 23.
7
Determining Critical Topics for Undergraduate Surgical Education in Rwanda: Results of a Modified Delphi Process and a Consensus Conference.确定卢旺达本科外科教育的关键主题:改良德尔菲法及共识会议的结果
Cureus. 2023 Aug 17;15(8):e43625. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43625. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Editor's Choice - Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms: A Delphi Consensus Document on Terminology, Definition, Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting Standards.编辑推荐——感染性原发性主动脉瘤:关于术语、定义、分类、诊断及报告标准的德尔菲共识文件
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Mar;65(3):323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.11.024. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
9
The Anatomical Society's core anatomy syllabus for undergraduate nursing.《解剖学会本科护理专业核心解剖学教学大纲》。
J Anat. 2018 May;232(5):721-728. doi: 10.1111/joa.12782. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
10
Establishing a veterinary anatomy core syllabus through a modified Delphi process.通过改良 Delphi 法建立兽医解剖学核心课程大纲。
J Anat. 2024 Jan;244(1):184-201. doi: 10.1111/joa.13948. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Need for Regulated Training and Certification for Providers Entering into Aesthetic Medicine.对进入美容医学领域的从业者进行规范培训和认证的必要性。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2025 Jul-Aug;18(7-8 Suppl 1):S30-S40.
2
Decades of Scientific Data and Global Media Reporting on Complications in Non-surgical Aesthetic Treatments for a Transparent Safety Profile: Kissing Snow White Awake.数十年科学数据及全球媒体对非手术美容治疗并发症的报道,以呈现透明的安全概况:唤醒白雪公主之吻。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05007-3.
3
Exploring the venous supply of the face: An illustrated overview of contemporary literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of teaching facial anatomy through cadaver dissection on aesthetic physicians' knowledge.通过尸体解剖教授面部解剖学对美容医生知识掌握情况的有效性。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Jul 17;8:475-480. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S139893. eCollection 2017.
2
Facial Assessment and Injection Guide for Botulinum Toxin and Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Focus on the Upper Face.肉毒杆菌毒素和可注射透明质酸填充剂的面部评估与注射指南:聚焦于上半脸
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Aug;140(2):265e-276e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003544.
3
An Update on the Anatomy of the Forehead Compartments.
探索面部的静脉供应:当代文献的图文概述。
JPRAS Open. 2024 Nov 6;43:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.019. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
A Systematic Review to Explore the Role of Industry and Regulators on Minimally Invasive Aesthetics Education: A Tale of Two Cities.一项探索行业与监管机构在微创美学教育中作用的系统评价:双城故事
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Mar;49(5):1495-1506. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04503-2. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
5
Investigating the Contraction Pattern of the Zygomaticus Major Muscle and its Clinical Relevance: A Functional MRI Study.研究颧大肌的收缩模式及其临床意义:一项功能性磁共振成像研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Jul;48(14):2722-2729. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03876-8. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
A Core Curriculum for Postgraduate Program in Nonsurgical Aesthetics: A Cross-sectional Delphi Study.非手术美容研究生课程核心课程:一项横断面德尔菲研究。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Apr 11;4:ojac023. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac023. eCollection 2022.
7
The 10-Point Plan 2021: Updated Concepts for Improved Procedural Safety During Facial Filler Treatments.《2021年十点计划:面部填充治疗中提高手术安全性的更新概念》
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 Jul 6;14:779-814. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S315711. eCollection 2021.
8
Cerebral Embolism as a Result of Facial Filler Injections: A Literature Review.面部填充物注射导致的脑栓塞:文献综述。
Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Feb 15;42(3):NP162-NP175. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab193.
9
Aspiration Before Tissue Filler-An Exercise in Futility and Unsafe Practice.注射填充前的抽吸——多此一举且不安全的做法。
Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):89-101. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab036.
10
A Novel Three-Dimensional Interactive Virtual Face to Facilitate Facial Anatomy Teaching Using Microsoft HoloLens.一种使用 Microsoft HoloLens 促进面部解剖教学的新型三维交互式虚拟人脸
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Jun;45(3):1005-1011. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-02110-5. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
前额各间隙解剖学的最新进展
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):864e-872e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003174.
4
Global Aesthetics Consensus: Avoidance and Management of Complications from Hyaluronic Acid Fillers-Evidence- and Opinion-Based Review and Consensus Recommendations.全球美学共识:透明质酸填充剂并发症的预防与处理——基于证据和观点的综述及共识建议
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun;137(6):961e-971e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002184.
5
Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review.解剖学教育中的最佳教学实践:批判性综述。
Ann Anat. 2016 Nov;208:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
Lower Face: Clinical Anatomy and Regional Approaches with Injectable Fillers.下脸部:临床解剖学与注射填充剂的区域应用方法
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5 Suppl):235S-257S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001836.
7
Upper Face: Clinical Anatomy and Regional Approaches with Injectable Fillers.上半面部:临床解剖学与注射填充剂的区域应用方法
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5 Suppl):204S-218S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001830.
8
Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession?--A review.人体解剖学的衰落对医学教育/职业有害吗?——一篇综述。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2015 Dec;37(10):1257-65. doi: 10.1007/s00276-015-1507-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
9
Blindness caused by cosmetic filler injection: a review of cause and therapy.美容填充剂注射导致的失明:病因与治疗综述
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):1197-1201. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000754.
10
A Delphi consensus study to identify current clinically most valuable orthopaedic anatomy components for teaching medical students.一项德尔菲共识研究,旨在确定当前对医学生教学而言临床上最具价值的骨科解剖学组成部分。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Oct 23;14:230. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-230.