• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disorganized Gyrification Network Properties During the Transition to Psychosis.在向精神病转变过程中,神经连接的紊乱。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):613-622. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0391.
2
Globally Efficient Brain Organization and Treatment Response in Psychosis: A Connectomic Study of Gyrification.精神病中全球高效的脑组织结构与治疗反应:一项脑回形成的连接组学研究
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Nov;42(6):1446-1456. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw069. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
3
Large-Scale Network Topology Reveals Heterogeneity in Individuals With at Risk Mental State for Psychosis: Findings From the Longitudinal Youth-at-Risk Study.大规模网络拓扑揭示了有精神病风险的个体的异质性:来自纵向高危青年研究的发现。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Dec 1;28(12):4234-4243. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx278.
4
Association of Adverse Outcomes With Emotion Processing and Its Neural Substrate in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.个体处于精神病临床高风险时,情绪处理及其神经基质与不良结果的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):190-200. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3501.
5
Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis.结构磁共振成像指标与处于精神病发病高风险的个体出现精神病的关联性:一项 ENIGMA 工作组的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):753-766. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0638.
6
Functional Connectivity in Antipsychotic-Treated and Antipsychotic-Naive Patients With First-Episode Psychosis and Low Risk of Self-harm or Aggression: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.抗精神病药物治疗和未接受抗精神病药物治疗的首发精神病和低自伤或攻击风险患者的功能连接:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):994-1004. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1422.
7
Rich-club connectivity and structural connectome organization in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis and individuals with early illness schizophrenia.临床精神病高危青少年和早期精神分裂症个体的富连接俱乐部连接和结构连接组组织。
Schizophr Res. 2023 May;255:110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
8
Use of Machine Learning to Determine Deviance in Neuroanatomical Maturity Associated With Future Psychosis in Youths at Clinically High Risk.利用机器学习确定与临床高风险青年未来精神病相关的神经解剖成熟度偏差。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):960-968. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1543.
9
Multimodal Machine Learning Workflows for Prediction of Psychosis in Patients With Clinical High-Risk Syndromes and Recent-Onset Depression.多模态机器学习工作流程用于预测有临床高风险综合征和近期发病的抑郁症患者的精神病。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 1;78(2):195-209. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3604.
10
Age-related brain structural alterations as an intermediate phenotype of psychosis.与年龄相关的脑结构改变作为精神病的一种中间表型。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2017 Sep;42(5):307-319. doi: 10.1503/jpn.160179.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between plasma betaine level and brain structural changes in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者血浆甜菜碱水平与脑结构变化之间的关联。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Aug 7;11(1):111. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00657-3.
2
Exploring the predictive value of structural covariance networks for the diagnosis of schizophrenia.探索结构协方差网络对精神分裂症诊断的预测价值。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 9;16:1570797. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1570797. eCollection 2025.
3
Resolving Heterogeneity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Individualized Structural Covariance Network Analysis.使用个体化结构协方差网络分析解决创伤后应激障碍中的异质性问题。
Depress Anxiety. 2024 Nov 1;2024:4399757. doi: 10.1155/2024/4399757. eCollection 2024.
4
The MR neuroimaging protocol for the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program.加速药物合作组织精神分裂症项目的磁共振神经成像方案。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Apr 2;11(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00581-6.
5
Brain network alterations in mobile phone use problem severity: A multimodal neuroimaging analysis.手机使用问题严重程度中的脑网络改变:多模态神经影像学分析
J Behav Addict. 2025 Mar 21;14(1):416-429. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00021. Print 2025 Mar 28.
6
Longitudinal inference of multiscale markers in psychosis: from hippocampal centrality to functional outcome.精神分裂症多尺度标志物的纵向推断:从海马体中心度到功能结局。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;29(10):2929-2938. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02549-x. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
7
Robust hierarchically organized whole-brain patterns of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders observed after personalized intrinsic network topography.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者在个性化内在网络拓扑结构后观察到的稳健的分层全脑连接异常模式。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Oct 15;44(15):5153-5166. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26453. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
8
Connectome-based predictive modeling of smoking severity using individualized structural covariance network in smokers.基于连接组的吸烟者个体结构协方差网络对吸烟严重程度的预测建模
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jul 21;17:1227422. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1227422. eCollection 2023.
9
Chaos analysis of the cortical boundary for the recognition of psychosis.精神分裂症识别的皮质边界混沌分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2023 Apr 25;48(2):E135-E142. doi: 10.1503/jpn.220160. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
10
Psychotic disorders as a framework for precision psychiatry.精神病障碍作为精准精神病学的框架。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2023 Apr;19(4):221-234. doi: 10.1038/s41582-023-00779-1. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
30 Years on: How the Neurodevelopmental Hypothesis of Schizophrenia Morphed Into the Developmental Risk Factor Model of Psychosis.30 年过去了:精神分裂症的神经发育假说如何演变成精神病的发育风险因素模型。
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Oct 21;43(6):1190-1196. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx121.
2
Only a small proportion of patients with first episode psychosis come via prodromal services: a retrospective survey of a large UK mental health programme.仅有一小部分首发精神病患者是通过前驱期服务前来就诊的:一项针对英国大型心理健康项目的回顾性调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 25;17(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1468-y.
3
Increased Occipital Gyrification and Development of Psychotic Disorders in Individuals With an At-Risk Mental State: A Multicenter Study.高枕叶回沟和有风险精神状态个体的精神障碍发展:一项多中心研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 15;82(10):737-745. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Progressive cortical reorganisation: A framework for investigating structural changes in schizophrenia.渐进性皮质重组:一个用于研究精神分裂症结构变化的框架。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Aug;79:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Development and Validation of a Clinically Based Risk Calculator for the Transdiagnostic Prediction of Psychosis.一种基于临床的精神病跨诊断预测风险计算器的开发与验证
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):493-500. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0284.
6
The "polyenviromic risk score": Aggregating environmental risk factors predicts conversion to psychosis in familial high-risk subjects.“多环境风险评分”:综合环境风险因素可预测家族性高危个体向精神病的转化。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Mar;181:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
7
Improving Prognostic Accuracy in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Systematic Review of Predictive Models and Meta-analytical Sequential Testing Simulation.提高临床高风险精神病患者的预后准确性:预测模型的系统评价和Meta分析序贯检验模拟
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Mar 1;43(2):375-388. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw098.
8
Structural Network Disorganization in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.临床高危精神病患者的结构网络紊乱
Schizophr Bull. 2017 May 1;43(3):583-591. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw110.
9
An Individualized Risk Calculator for Research in Prodromal Psychosis.一种用于前驱性精神病研究的个性化风险计算器。
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 1;173(10):980-988. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15070890. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Globally Efficient Brain Organization and Treatment Response in Psychosis: A Connectomic Study of Gyrification.精神病中全球高效的脑组织结构与治疗反应:一项脑回形成的连接组学研究
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Nov;42(6):1446-1456. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw069. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

在向精神病转变过程中,神经连接的紊乱。

Disorganized Gyrification Network Properties During the Transition to Psychosis.

机构信息

Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):613-622. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0391.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0391
PMID:29710118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6137528/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is urgent need to improve the limited prognostic accuracy of clinical instruments to predict psychosis onset in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. As yet, no reliable biological marker has been established to delineate CHR individuals who will develop psychosis from those who will not.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate abnormalities in a graph-based gyrification connectome in the early stages of psychosis and to test the accuracy of this systems-based approach to predict a transition to psychosis among CHR individuals.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This investigation was a cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study with follow-up assessment to determine the transition status of CHR individuals. Participants were recruited from a specialized clinic for the early detection of psychosis at the Department of Psychiatry (Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken [UPK]), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Participants included individuals in the following 4 study groups: 44 healthy controls (HC group), 63 at-risk mental state (ARMS) individuals without later transition to psychosis (ARMS-NT group), 16 ARMS individuals with later transition to psychosis (ARMS-T group), and 38 antipsychotic-free patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP group). The study dates were November 2008 to November 2014. The dates of analysis were March to November 2017.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Gyrification-based structural covariance networks (connectomes) were constructed to quantify global integration, segregation, and small-worldness. Group differences in network measures were assessed using functional data analysis across a range of network densities. The extremely randomized trees algorithm with repeated 5-fold cross-validation was used to delineate ARMS-T individuals from ARMS-NT individuals. Permutation tests were conducted to assess the significance of classification performance measures.

RESULTS

The 4 study groups comprised 161 participants with mean (SD) ages ranging from 24.0 (4.7) to 25.9 (5.7) years. Small-worldness was reduced in the ARMS-T and FEP groups and was associated with decreased integration and increased segregation in both groups (Hedges g range, 0.666-1.050). Using the connectome properties as features, a good classification performance was obtained (accuracy, 90.49%; balanced accuracy, 81.34%; positive predictive value, 84.47%; negative predictive value, 92.18%; sensitivity, 66.11%; specificity, 96.58%; and area under the curve, 88.30%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that there is poor integration in the coordinated development of cortical folding in patients who develop psychosis. These results further suggest that gyrification-based connectomes might be a promising means to generate systems-based measures from anatomical data to improve individual prediction of a transition to psychosis in CHR individuals.

摘要

重要性

迫切需要提高临床仪器预测精神病高危(CHR)人群精神病发作的有限预后准确性。到目前为止,还没有可靠的生物学标志物来区分哪些 CHR 个体将发展为精神病,哪些不会。

目的

探讨精神病早期基于图的脑回连接组的异常,并检验这种基于系统的方法预测 CHR 个体向精神病过渡的准确性。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项横断面磁共振成像(MRI)研究,随访评估以确定 CHR 个体的过渡状态。参与者来自瑞士巴塞尔大学精神病学系(UPK)专门的精神病早期检测诊所。参与者包括以下 4 个研究组:44 名健康对照(HC 组)、63 名无后期精神病发作的高危精神状态(ARMS)个体(ARMS-NT 组)、16 名后期精神病发作的 ARMS 个体(ARMS-T 组)和 38 名未服用抗精神病药物的首发精神病患者(FEP 组)。研究日期为 2008 年 11 月至 2014 年 11 月。分析日期为 2017 年 3 月至 11 月。

主要结果和测量

构建了基于脑回的结构协变网络(连接组),以量化整体整合、分离和小世界特性。使用功能数据分析评估了网络密度范围内各网络测量的组间差异。使用极端随机树算法和重复 5 倍交叉验证来区分 ARMS-T 个体和 ARMS-NT 个体。进行置换检验以评估分类性能测量的显著性。

结果

4 个研究组包括 161 名参与者,平均年龄(标准差)为 24.0(4.7)至 25.9(5.7)岁。ARMS-T 组和 FEP 组的小世界特性降低,两组的整合减少,分离增加(Hedges g 范围为 0.666-1.050)。使用连接组特性作为特征,得到了良好的分类性能(准确率为 90.49%,平衡准确率为 81.34%,阳性预测值为 84.47%,阴性预测值为 92.18%,敏感性为 66.11%,特异性为 96.58%,曲线下面积为 88.30%)。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,在发展为精神病的患者中,皮质折叠的协调发育存在整合不良。这些结果进一步表明,基于脑回的连接组可能是一种很有前途的方法,可以从解剖数据中生成基于系统的测量值,从而提高 CHR 个体向精神病过渡的个体预测能力。