Suppr超能文献

与限制型神经性厌食症亚型相比,暴饮暴食/清除型神经性厌食症亚型的神经认知障碍更为严重。

Neurocognitive Impairments Are More Severe in the Binge-Eating/Purging Anorexia Nervosa Subtype Than in the Restricting Subtype.

作者信息

Tamiya Hiroko, Ouchi Atushi, Chen Runshu, Miyazawa Shiho, Akimoto Yoritaka, Kaneda Yasuhiro, Sora Ichiro

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Department of Biological Psychiatry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 16;9:138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00138. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

To evaluate cognitive function impairment in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) of either the restricting (ANR) or binge-eating/purging (ANBP) subtype. We administered the Japanese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery to 22 patients with ANR, 18 patients with ANBP, and 69 healthy control subjects. Our participants were selected from among the patients at the Kobe University Hospital and community residents. Compared to the healthy controls, the ANR group had significantly lower visual learning and social cognition scores, and the ANBP group had significantly lower processing speed, attention/vigilance, visual learning, reasoning/problem-solving, and social cognition scores. Compared to the ANR group, the ANBP group had significantly lower attention/vigilance scores. The AN subtypes differed in cognitive function impairments. Participants with ANBP, which is associated with higher mortality rates than ANR, exhibited greater impairment severities, especially in the attention/vigilance domain, confirming the presence of impairments in continuous concentration. This may relate to the impulsivity, an ANBP characteristic reported in the personality research. Future studies can further clarify the cognitive impairments of each subtype by addressing the subtype cognitive functions and personality characteristics.

摘要

评估限制型(ANR)或暴饮暴食/清除型(ANBP)神经性厌食症(AN)患者的认知功能损害。我们对22例ANR患者、18例ANBP患者和69名健康对照者进行了日本版的MATRICS共识认知成套测验。我们的参与者是从神户大学医院的患者和社区居民中挑选出来的。与健康对照组相比,ANR组的视觉学习和社会认知得分显著较低,ANBP组的处理速度、注意力/警觉性、视觉学习、推理/解决问题和社会认知得分显著较低。与ANR组相比,ANBP组的注意力/警觉性得分显著较低。AN的亚型在认知功能损害方面存在差异。与ANR相比,ANBP的死亡率更高,其参与者表现出更严重的损害,尤其是在注意力/警觉性领域,证实了持续注意力存在损害。这可能与人格研究中报道的ANBP特征冲动性有关。未来的研究可以通过研究亚型认知功能和人格特征来进一步阐明每种亚型的认知损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab6/5911723/885254e405c4/fpsyt-09-00138-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验