• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从行政数据中识别糖尿病病例:一项基于人群的验证研究。

Identifying diabetes cases from administrative data: a population-based validation study.

作者信息

Lipscombe Lorraine L, Hwee Jeremiah, Webster Lauren, Shah Baiju R, Booth Gillian L, Tu Karen

机构信息

Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B1, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Suite RFE 3-805, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 2;18(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3148-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3148-0
PMID:29720153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5932874/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care data allow for the study and surveillance of chronic diseases such as diabetes. The objective of this study was to identify and validate optimal algorithms for diabetes cases within health care administrative databases for different research purposes, populations, and data sources.

METHODS

We linked health care administrative databases from Ontario, Canada to a reference standard of primary care electronic medical records (EMRs). We then identified and calculated the performance characteristics of multiple adult diabetes case definitions, using combinations of data sources and time windows.

RESULTS

The best algorithm to identify diabetes cases was the presence at any time of one hospitalization or physician claim for diabetes AND either one prescription for an anti-diabetic medication or one physician claim with a diabetes-specific fee code [sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 99.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) 92.5%]. Use of physician claims alone performed almost as well: three physician claims for diabetes within one year was highly specific (sensitivity 79.9%, specificity 99.1%, PPV 91.4%) and one physician claim at any time was highly sensitive (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 91.9%, PPV 58.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies validated algorithms to capture diabetes cases within health care administrative databases for a range of purposes, populations and data availability. These findings are useful to study trends and outcomes of diabetes using routinely-collected health care data.

摘要

背景

医疗保健数据有助于对糖尿病等慢性病进行研究和监测。本研究的目的是针对不同的研究目的、人群和数据源,在医疗保健管理数据库中识别并验证用于确定糖尿病病例的最佳算法。

方法

我们将加拿大安大略省的医疗保健管理数据库与初级保健电子病历(EMR)的参考标准相链接。然后,我们利用数据源和时间窗口的组合,识别并计算了多种成人糖尿病病例定义的性能特征。

结果

识别糖尿病病例的最佳算法是:在任何时间有一次糖尿病住院记录或医生诊断记录,并且有一次抗糖尿病药物处方或一次带有糖尿病特定收费代码的医生诊断记录[灵敏度84.2%,特异度99.2%,阳性预测值(PPV)92.5%]。仅使用医生诊断记录的效果也几乎相同:一年内有三次医生诊断记录为糖尿病的特异度很高(灵敏度79.9%,特异度99.1%,PPV 91.4%),在任何时间有一次医生诊断记录的灵敏度很高(灵敏度93.6%,特异度91.9%,PPV 58.5%)。

结论

本研究识别出了经过验证的算法,可用于在医疗保健管理数据库中针对一系列目的、人群和数据可用性捕获糖尿病病例。这些发现对于利用常规收集的医疗保健数据研究糖尿病的趋势和结果很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97d4/5932874/9f3549d42b3e/12913_2018_3148_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97d4/5932874/9f3549d42b3e/12913_2018_3148_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97d4/5932874/9f3549d42b3e/12913_2018_3148_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying diabetes cases from administrative data: a population-based validation study.从行政数据中识别糖尿病病例:一项基于人群的验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 2;18(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3148-0.
2
Identification of Physician-Diagnosed Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in Population-Based Administrative Data: A Validation Study Using Family Physicians' Electronic Medical Records.在基于人群的行政数据中识别医生诊断的阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症:一项使用家庭医生电子病历的验证研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Aug 10;54(1):337-49. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160105.
3
Accuracy of Canadian health administrative databases in identifying patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a validation study using the medical records of rheumatologists.加拿大健康管理数据库在识别类风湿关节炎患者中的准确性:一项使用风湿病医生病历的验证研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Oct;65(10):1582-91. doi: 10.1002/acr.22031.
4
Validation of international algorithms to identify adults with inflammatory bowel disease in health administrative data from Ontario, Canada.验证国际算法在加拿大安大略省健康管理数据中识别成人炎症性肠病的有效性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):887-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.019. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
5
Validation of an algorithm to identify children with biopsy-proven celiac disease from within health administrative data: An assessment of health services utilization patterns in Ontario, Canada.从健康管理数据中识别经活检证实的乳糜泻患儿的算法验证:加拿大安大略省卫生服务利用模式评估
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0180338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180338. eCollection 2017.
6
Identifying individuals with physician-diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care electronic medical records: a retrospective chart abstraction study.在初级保健电子病历中识别经医生诊断的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者:一项回顾性图表提取研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 May 15;27(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0035-9.
7
An administrative data validation study of the accuracy of algorithms for identifying rheumatoid arthritis: the influence of the reference standard on algorithm performance.一项关于类风湿性关节炎识别算法准确性的行政数据验证研究:参考标准对算法性能的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jun 23;15:216. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-216.
8
Systematic review of validated case definitions for diabetes in ICD-9-coded and ICD-10-coded data in adult populations.对成人人群中ICD - 9编码和ICD - 10编码数据中糖尿病有效病例定义的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 5;6(8):e009952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009952.
9
A validation study of administrative data algorithms to identify patients with Parkinsonism with prevalence and incidence trends.一项用于识别帕金森症患者并分析患病率和发病率趋势的行政数据算法验证研究。
Neuroepidemiology. 2014;43(1):28-37. doi: 10.1159/000365590. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Validation of infant immunization billing codes in administrative data.行政数据中婴儿免疫接种计费代码的验证
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(7):1840-7. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1043499.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Inertia in an Insured Population with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study.美国参保的2型糖尿病患者的治疗惰性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01793-w.
2
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Health Status and Long-Term Outcomes in a Primary Prevention Cohort.初级预防队列中心血管健康状况和长期结局的性别差异。
JACC Adv. 2025 Sep 1;4(10 Pt 2):102108. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102108.
3
Uptake of novel evidence-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes after a cardiovascular event: insights from CANHEART.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary Care Physician Volume and Quality of Diabetes Care: A Population-Based Cohort Study.初级保健医生的糖尿病护理量和质量:基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Feb 21;166(4):240-247. doi: 10.7326/M16-1056. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
2
Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants.1980年以来全球糖尿病趋势:对751项基于人群的研究进行的汇总分析,涉及440万参与者。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1513-1530. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
3
Using linked electronic data to validate algorithms for health outcomes in administrative databases.
心血管事件后2型糖尿病患者对新型循证疗法的接受情况:来自CANHEART研究的见解
CJC Open. 2025 Feb 18;7(8):1055-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.02.008. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and COVID-19 infection and adverse outcomes: a cohort study.二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与2019冠状病毒病感染及不良结局之间的关联:一项队列研究
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2025 Aug 7;13(4):e004677. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004677.
5
Cholesterol Levels and Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Statin Initiation for Primary Prevention: A Cohort Study.他汀类药物起始用于一级预防后的胆固醇水平与心血管结局:一项队列研究
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul;4(7):101864. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101864.
6
The Impact of Real-world Use of Overactive Bladder Medications on Dementia Risk in Younger Adults.膀胱过度活动症药物的实际应用对年轻人痴呆风险的影响
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Jul 11;78:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.06.008. eCollection 2025 Aug.
7
Retention in Opioid Agonist Therapy Among First Nations People.原住民接受阿片类激动剂治疗的留存情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2518452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18452.
8
Trends in Depression Among Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Spain (2017-2023): A Population-Based Analysis with a Focus on Sex Differences and In-Hospital Outcomes.西班牙2型糖尿病住院患者的抑郁趋势(2017 - 2023年):一项基于人群的分析,重点关注性别差异和住院结局
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 1;14(11):3895. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113895.
9
The rise and fall of raloxifene use for osteoporosis, 1999-2022.1999年至2022年,雷洛昔芬用于治疗骨质疏松症的使用情况兴衰变迁。
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07544-8.
10
Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Reduced Access to Natriuretic Peptide Testing in the Outpatient Setting: A Population-based Evaluation.低社会经济地位与门诊环境中利钠肽检测的可及性降低相关:一项基于人群的评估。
CJC Open. 2025 Jan 7;7(4):390-401. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.01.002. eCollection 2025 Apr.
利用关联电子数据验证行政数据库中健康结果的算法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):359-66. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.14.
4
Are family physicians comprehensively using electronic medical records such that the data can be used for secondary purposes? A Canadian perspective.家庭医生是否在全面使用电子病历,以便这些数据可用于次要目的?加拿大的视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Aug 13;15:67. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0195-x.
5
Trends in incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and serious perinatal outcomes: a large, population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996-2010.妊娠糖尿病发病率及严重围产期结局的变化趋势:加拿大安大略省基于人群的 1996-2010 年大型研究。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1590-6. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2717. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
6
Evaluation of Electronic Medical Record Administrative data Linked Database (EMRALD).电子病历管理数据链接数据库(EMRALD)评估
Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(1):e15-21.
7
Mortality trends in patients with and without diabetes in Ontario, Canada and the UK from 1996 to 2009: a population-based study.1996 年至 2009 年加拿大安大略省和英国有和无糖尿病患者的死亡率趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Diabetologia. 2013 Dec;56(12):2601-8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3063-1. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
Preeclampsia as a risk factor for diabetes: a population-based cohort study.子痫前期作为糖尿病的一个风险因素:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001425. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
9
The impact of income on the incidence of diabetes: a population-based study.收入对糖尿病发病率的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Mar;99(3):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
10
Incidence of diabetes among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.绝经后乳腺癌幸存者的糖尿病发病率。
Diabetologia. 2013 Mar;56(3):476-83. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2793-9. Epub 2012 Dec 13.