• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二元组和群体中的人际吸引:观察者与被观察者之心的影响。

Interpersonal Attraction in Dyads and Groups: Effects of the Hearts of the Beholder and the Beheld.

作者信息

Malloy Thomas E

机构信息

Rhode Island College.

出版信息

Eur J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;48(3):285-302. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2324. Epub 2017 May 25.

DOI:10.1002/ejsp.2324
PMID:29731523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5930872/
Abstract

Dyadic interpersonal attraction (IA) was studied within groups of very highly acquainted family members, friends and co-workers. IA was determined by the perceiver (i.e., the heart of the beholder), the target (i.e., the heart of the beheld), and in specific dyads, by the unique combination of the two. The consistency of one's attraction to others and others' attraction to the person across groups were addressed using the . Attraction to a person in one group was independent of attraction to that person in another, although people predicted that members of different groups were similarly attracted to them. A new model (ARRMA) was specified to simultaneously study assumed reciprocity, actual reciprocity, and metaperception accuracy of attraction (i.e., accurate predictions of others' attraction to oneself). Assumed reciprocity of IA was substantial at the individual and dyadic levels. Reciprocity of attraction at the individual level, a heretofore unconfirmed "plausible hypothesis" (Newcomb, 1979), was supported; dyadic reciprocity was weak. Meta-accuracy of IA was observed among individuals but was weak in dyads. Perceived interpersonal similarity predicted IA among individuals and in specific dyads. Considering dyadic attraction within and between groups, and the use of componential analysis permitted the specification of new IA phenomena and resolved a long standing theoretical problem regarding the reciprocity of attraction.

摘要

在关系极为亲密的家庭成员、朋友和同事群体中,研究了二元人际吸引力(IA)。人际吸引力由感知者(即旁观者之心)、目标对象(即被观察者之心)决定,在特定二元关系中,还由两者的独特组合决定。通过使用[具体方法未提及]来探讨一个人对他人的吸引力以及他人对这个人的吸引力在不同群体间的一致性。对一个人在某一群体中的吸引力与在另一群体中对该人的吸引力相互独立,尽管人们预测不同群体的成员对他们的吸引力相似。提出了一个新模型(ARRMA),用于同时研究假定的互惠性、实际的互惠性以及吸引力的元感知准确性(即准确预测他人对自己的吸引力)。在个体和二元关系层面,假定的人际吸引力互惠性都很显著。个体层面吸引力的互惠性,这一此前未得到证实的“似是而非的假设”(纽科姆,1979年)得到了支持;二元关系中的互惠性较弱。在个体间观察到了人际吸引力的元准确性,但在二元关系中较弱。感知到的人际相似性预测了个体间以及特定二元关系中的人际吸引力。考虑群体内部和群体之间的二元吸引力,并使用成分分析,有助于明确新的人际吸引力现象,并解决了一个长期存在的关于吸引力互惠性的理论问题。

相似文献

1
Interpersonal Attraction in Dyads and Groups: Effects of the Hearts of the Beholder and the Beheld.二元组和群体中的人际吸引:观察者与被观察者之心的影响。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;48(3):285-302. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2324. Epub 2017 May 25.
2
ARRMA: An Integrative Theoretical and Mathematical Model of Assumed and Actual Dyadic Behavior.ARRMA:假设和实际二元行为的综合理论与数学模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 7;13:834796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834796. eCollection 2022.
3
What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.差异为何有差异?组织中多元化团队的承诺与现实。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x. Epub 2005 Oct 1.
4
Meta-accuracy among acquainted individuals: a social relations analysis of interpersonal perception and metaperception.熟人之间的元准确性:人际感知与元感知的社会关系分析
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jan;72(1):66-74. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.66.
5
A two-dimensional model for the study of interpersonal attraction.二维人际吸引模型研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014 Feb;18(1):59-86. doi: 10.1177/1088868313501887. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
6
Neural precursors of future liking and affective reciprocity.未来喜好和情感互惠的神经前体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 24;115(17):4375-4380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802176115. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
7
What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study.是什么导致了浪漫的吸引力:相似性、互惠性、安全感还是美貌?一项速配研究的证据。
J Pers. 2009 Aug;77(4):933-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00570.x. Epub 2009 May 18.
8
Do Agency and Communion Explain the Relationship Between Perceiver and Target Effects in Interpersonal Perception? A Meta-Analysis on Generalized Reciprocity.主体间知觉中知觉者和目标效应的关系能否用施事和互惠来解释?广义互惠的元分析
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Oct;49(10):1479-1494. doi: 10.1177/01461672221107205. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
9
Componential analysis of interpersonal perception data.人际知觉数据的成分分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):282-94. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_1.
10
Interpersonal perception in a social context.社会背景下的人际感知。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Mar;58(3):419-28. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.3.419.

引用本文的文献

1
ARRMA: An Integrative Theoretical and Mathematical Model of Assumed and Actual Dyadic Behavior.ARRMA:假设和实际二元行为的综合理论与数学模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 7;13:834796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834796. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
When does familiarity promote versus undermine interpersonal attraction? A proposed integrative model from erstwhile adversaries.熟悉度何时促进而非破坏人际吸引?昔日对手提出的综合模型。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/1745691614561682.
2
Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction.熟悉感确实会促进现场互动中的吸引力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):557-70. doi: 10.1037/a0022885.
3
Status-based asymmetry in intergroup responses: Implications for intergroup reconciliation.基于地位的群体间反应的不对称性:对群体间和解的启示。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2011 Jan;17(1):31-42. doi: 10.1037/a0021666.
4
Componential analysis of interpersonal perception data.人际知觉数据的成分分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):282-94. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_1.
5
Agreement in personality judgments within and between nonoverlapping social groups in collectivist cultures.集体主义文化中不重叠社会群体内部及之间在人格判断上的一致性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Jan;30(1):106-17. doi: 10.1177/0146167203258863.
6
Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity.影响对他人理解得分及假定相似性的过程。
Psychol Bull. 1955 May;52(3):177-93. doi: 10.1037/h0044919.
7
Conceptual and methodological problems in interpersonal perception.人际感知中的概念和方法问题。
Psychol Rev. 1955 Nov;62(6):411-22. doi: 10.1037/h0047205.
8
Effects of communication, information overlap, and behavioral consistency on consensus in social perception.沟通、信息重叠和行为一致性对社会认知中共识的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Aug;73(2):270-80. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.2.270.
9
Interpersonal perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Feb;72(2):390-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.2.390.
10
Agreement and accuracy in children's interpersonal perceptions: a social relations analysis.儿童人际认知中的一致性与准确性:一项社会关系分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Oct;71(4):692-702. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.4.692.