Kristinsson Sigurður
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Akureyri, 600 Akureyri, Iceland.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2017 Feb 20;3:109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.003. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Surrogate motherhood has been prohibited by Icelandic law since 1996, but in recent years, Icelandic couples have sought transnational surrogacy in India and the United States despite uncertainties about legal parental status as they return to Iceland with infants born to surrogate mothers. This reflects global trends of increased reproductive tourism, which forces restrictive regimes not only to make decisions concerning the citizenship and parentage of children born to surrogate mothers abroad, but also to confront difficult moral issues concerning surrogacy, global justice, human rights and exploitation. In March 2015, a legislative proposal permitting altruistic surrogacy, subject to strict regulation and oversight, and prohibiting the solicitation of commercial surrogacy abroad, was presented in the Icelandic Parliament. The proposal aims to protect the interest of the child first, respect the autonomy of the surrogate second, and accommodate the intended parents' wishes third. After a brief overview of the development of the surrogacy issue in Iceland, this article describes the main features of this legislative proposal and evaluates it from an ethical and global justice perspective. It concludes that the proposed legislation is a response to problems generated by cross-border surrogacy in the context of evolving public attitudes toward the issue, and constitutes a valid attempt to reduce the moral hazards of surrogacy consistent with insights from current bioethical literature. Although the proposed legislation arguably represents an improvement over the current ban, however, difficult problems concerning evasive travel and global injustice are likely to persist until effective international coordination is achieved.
自1996年起,冰岛法律便禁止代孕行为。然而近年来,冰岛夫妇却前往印度和美国寻求跨国代孕服务,尽管当他们带着代孕母亲所生婴儿返回冰岛时,其合法父母身份存在不确定性。这反映了生殖旅游日益增多的全球趋势,这一趋势迫使实行严格限制措施的国家不仅要就国外代孕母亲所生孩子的公民身份和亲子关系做出决定,还要面对有关代孕、全球正义、人权和剥削等棘手的道德问题。2015年3月,冰岛议会提出一项立法提案,允许在严格监管下进行利他性代孕,并禁止在国外招揽商业代孕。该提案旨在首先保护儿童利益,其次尊重代孕者的自主权,第三兼顾准父母的意愿。在简要概述冰岛代孕问题的发展情况后,本文介绍了这项立法提案的主要特点,并从伦理和全球正义的角度对其进行评估。文章得出结论,拟议中的立法是在公众对该问题的态度不断演变的背景下,针对跨境代孕产生的问题所做出的回应,并且是一次根据当前生物伦理文献的见解,有效降低代孕道德风险的尝试。尽管拟议中的立法可以说是对现行禁令的一种改进,然而,在实现有效的国际协调之前,有关规避性旅行和全球不公正的难题可能仍将存在。