Human Environments Analysis Laboratory, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Middlesex-London Health Unit, London, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
As children's lifestyles have become increasingly sedentary, active school travel can be a relatively accessible way to increase their daily physical activity. In recent years, several different models of interventions have been utilized to promote children participating in active school travel. This review documents and analyzes the different active school travel intervention methodologies that have been used in North America (Canada or U.S.) by collecting, organizing, and evaluating data relating to all phases of active school travel interventions.
This systematic review developed a key word search and applied it in six databases (BIOSIS Previews, GeoBase, PubMed, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science) to gather scholarly literature. A total of 22 studies evaluating children's active school travel interventions in a North American setting (four Canada, 18 U.S.) were identified for the period between January 2010 and March 2017.
Applying the Safe Routes to School Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, Engineering, Equity, and Evaluation ("6 E's") framework, interventions were thematically assessed for their structure and organization, approaches and methods, and outcomes and discussions. Encouragement and education were the most commonly observed themes within the different methodologies of the studies reviewed. Details relating to intervention approaches and methods were common; whereas data relating to intervention structure and organization received much less attention.
Kingdon's multiple streams approach was applied to frame the findings for program facilitators and evaluators. Within the multiple streams approach, several considerations are offered to address and potentially improve active school travel intervention conceptualization, partnerships, organization, and evaluation.
随着儿童生活方式变得越来越久坐不动,积极的上学交通方式相对容易增加他们的日常身体活动量。近年来,为了促进儿童参与积极的上学交通方式,已经采用了几种不同的干预模式。本综述通过收集、组织和评估与积极上学交通干预所有阶段相关的数据,记录和分析了在北美(加拿大或美国)使用的不同的积极上学交通干预方法学。
本系统综述制定了一个关键词搜索,并将其应用于六个数据库(BIOSIS Previews、GeoBase、PubMed、SCOPUS、SPORTDiscus、Web of Science),以收集学术文献。总共确定了 22 项在北美背景下评估儿童积极上学交通干预的研究(加拿大 4 项,美国 18 项),时间范围为 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月。
应用“安全路径到学校教育、鼓励、强制、工程、公平和评估(“6E”)”框架,根据结构和组织、方法和手段以及结果和讨论对干预措施进行主题评估。在综述中,不同方法学的研究中最常见的主题是鼓励和教育。干预方法和手段的细节是常见的;而与干预结构和组织相关的数据则受到较少关注。
Kingdon 的多流方法被用来为计划促进者和评估者构建研究结果。在多流方法中,提出了一些考虑因素,以解决和可能改进积极上学交通干预的概念化、伙伴关系、组织和评估。