Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, School of Public Health in Austin, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX 78701, USA.
Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 5;19(3):1810. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031810.
Past evaluations of Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs have been relatively small in scope and have lacked objective measurements of physical activity. A 2016 Mobility Bond in Austin, Texas, USA, allocated USD 27.5 million for infrastructure changes to facilitate active commuting to schools (ACS). The Safe TRavel Environment Evaluation in Texas Schools (STREETS) study aims to determine the health effects of these infrastructure changes. The purpose of this paper is to describe the STREETS study design, methods, and selected baseline results. The STREETS study is comprised of two designs: (1) a serial cross-sectional design to assess changes in ACS prevalence, and (2) a quasi-experimental, prospective cohort to examine changes in physical activity. Differences between study arms (Austin SRTS and comparison) were assessed for school demographics, ACS, and school programs. At baseline, 14.3% of school trips were made by ACS, with non-significant differences between study arms. Only 26% of schools implemented ACS-related programs. Some significant differences across SRTS and comparison schools were identified for several school- and neighborhood-level characteristics. Substantial changes are needed across area schools and neighborhoods to promote optimum ACS. STREETS study longitudinal findings will be critical for informing optimal future implementations of SRTS programs.
过去对“安全接送学生上下学(SRTS)”计划的评估范围相对较小,并且缺乏对体育活动的客观测量。2016 年,美国得克萨斯州奥斯汀市的一项交通债券拨款 2750 万美元,用于基础设施改造,以方便学生积极通勤上学(ACS)。“德克萨斯州学校安全出行环境评估(STREETS)”研究旨在确定这些基础设施变化对健康的影响。本文旨在描述 STREETS 研究的设计、方法和选定的基线结果。STREETS 研究由两个设计组成:(1) 采用序列横断面设计评估 ACS 流行率的变化;(2) 采用准实验前瞻性队列研究来检验体育活动的变化。研究组(奥斯汀 SRTS 和对照组)之间的差异评估了学校人口统计学、ACS 和学校计划。在基线时,有 14.3%的上学行程是通过 ACS 完成的,研究组之间没有显著差异。只有 26%的学校实施了与 ACS 相关的计划。在一些学校和社区层面的特征上,SRTS 和对照组之间存在一些显著差异。需要在整个地区的学校和社区进行重大变革,以促进最佳的 ACS。STREETS 研究的纵向研究结果对于为未来 SRTS 计划的最佳实施提供信息至关重要。