Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Research Group for Experimental Surgery, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Clinic Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, University of Witten Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;156(2):544-554.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.111. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
Despite substantial scientific effort, the relationship between stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting and the use of the aortic no-touch off-pump technique (anOPCAB) remains incompletely understood. The present study aimed to define the effect of anOPCAB on the occurrence and time point of stroke.
A total cohort of 15,042 consecutive patients underwent surgical myocardial revascularization at a single institution. After establishing anOPCAB as routine procedure, 4695 patients received surgery by 18 different surgeons using the anaortic approach. After the exclusion of all patients with cardiogenic shock and "side-clamp" off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 13,279 patients (4485 with anOPCAB) were included in the study. Perioperative strokes were classified as strokes occurring during the hospital stay, with early strokes observed immediately after emergence from anesthesia (vs delayed strokes).
The anOPCAB technique reduced the postoperative stroke rate to 0.49% versus 1.31% in on-pump patients (P < .0001). The overall stroke rate after adoption of anOPCAB (0.64%) decreased compared with before its adoption (1.40%; P < .0001). With anOPCAB, the risk of early strokes virtually disappeared to 4 of 4485 patients (0.09%; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.18% vs 0.83% in on-pump patients; P < .0001), whereas the incidence of delayed strokes was not affected (0.40% vs 0.48%; P = .5181). The key results were confirmed after adjustment using propensity score-based analyses.
The anOPCAB technique with avoidance of any aortic manipulation is an effective tool to minimize the risk of early strokes during coronary artery bypass grafting, and thus, should be considered as a routine approach. In contrast, additional preventive strategies against delayed strokes remain to be elaborated.
尽管进行了大量的科学研究,但冠状动脉旁路移植术后中风与使用主动脉非接触式不停跳搭桥术(anOPCAB)之间的关系仍不完全清楚。本研究旨在确定 anOPCAB 对中风发生和时间点的影响。
在一个机构中,共有 15042 例连续患者接受了手术心肌血运重建。在将 anOPCAB 确立为常规手术方法后,有 18 位不同的外科医生采用非主动脉方法对 4695 例患者进行了手术。排除所有心源性休克和“侧夹”不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术患者后,共有 13279 例患者(4485 例采用 anOPCAB)纳入研究。围手术期中风分为住院期间发生的中风,早期中风发生在麻醉苏醒后(vs 延迟性中风)。
anOPCAB 技术将术后中风率从 131%降至 49%(P<0.0001)。采用 anOPCAB 后(0.64%)的总体中风率低于采用前(1.40%;P<0.0001)。采用 anOPCAB 时,4485 例患者中几乎没有发生早期中风(0.09%;95%置信区间,0.00-0.18%),而没有发生晚期中风(0.40%)(P<0.0001)。使用倾向评分匹配分析调整后的关键结果得到了证实。
避免任何主动脉操作的 anOPCAB 技术是降低冠状动脉旁路移植术中早期中风风险的有效工具,因此应考虑作为常规方法。相比之下,针对延迟性中风的其他预防策略仍有待制定。