Sousa Deise Maria Do Nascimento, Chagas Ana Carolina Maria Araújo, Vasconcelos Camila Teixeira Moreira, Stein Airton Tetelbom, Oriá Mônica Oliveira Batista
Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Ciencias da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, CE, Brazil.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26:e2999. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2340.2999. Epub 2018 May 17.
to develop and validate the content of a clinical protocol aimed at prevention of cervical cancer in primary care.
technological research according to the steps: (1) submission of the project to the research ethics committee; (2) bibliographic survey; (3) elaboration of the clinical protocol; and (4) content validation. In the third step, the information was collected through bibliographic research and gynecology specialists were consulted. For the final step, four judges were selected to evaluate the clinical protocol according to AGREE 2. Domains that reached the minimum level of agreement of 75% in the scores were considered validated.
the scores obtained in each domain of the instrument were as follows: domain 1 (scope and purpose) = 87.5%; domain 2 (stakeholder involvement) = 83.3%; domain 3 (development rigor) = 79.7%; domain 4 (clarity of presentation) = 76.3%; domain 5 (applicability) = 78.1%; and domain 6 (editorial independence) = 85.4.
the clinical protocol proved to be a validated material with scores above the minimum required. The protocol obtained positive recommendations with modifications and went through adjustments in order to make it more effective.
制定并验证一项旨在初级保健中预防宫颈癌的临床方案的内容。
按照以下步骤进行技术研究：（1）将项目提交给研究伦理委员会；（2）文献调查；（3）制定临床方案；以及（4）内容验证。在第三步中，通过文献研究收集信息并咨询妇科专家。在最后一步中，选择了四名评委根据AGREE 2对临床方案进行评估。得分达到最低一致水平75%的领域被视为有效。
该工具各领域的得分如下：领域1（范围和目的）=87.5%；领域2（利益相关者参与）=83.3%；领域3（制定严谨性）=79.7%；领域4（表述清晰度）=76.3%；领域5（适用性）=78.1%；领域6（编辑独立性）=85.4。
临床方案被证明是一份经过验证的材料，得分高于最低要求。该方案获得了带有修改建议的积极推荐，并进行了调整以使其更有效。
