Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Tob Control. 2019 May;28(Suppl 1):s31-s36. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054160. Epub 2018 May 24.
Recent studies show that greater price variability and more opportunities for tax avoidance are associated with tax structures that depart from a specific uniform one. These findings indicate that tax structures other than a specific uniform one may lead to more cigarette consumption.
This paper aims to examine how cigarette tax structure is associated with cigarette consumption.
We used survey data taken from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project in 17 countries to conduct the analysis. Self-reported cigarette consumption was aggregated to average measures for each surveyed country and wave. The effect of tax structures on cigarette consumption was estimated using generalised estimating equations after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, average taxes and year fixed effects.
Our study provides important empirical evidence of a relationship between tax structure and cigarette consumption. We find that a change from a specific to an ad valorem structure is associated with a 6%-11% higher cigarette consumption. In addition, a change from uniform to tiered structure is associated with a 34%-65% higher cigarette consumption. The results are consistent with existing evidence and suggest that a uniform and specific tax structure is the most effective tax structure for reducing tobacco consumption.
最近的研究表明,价格变化幅度更大且有更多避税机会的税收结构与偏离特定统一模式的税收结构有关。这些发现表明,除了特定统一模式之外的税收结构可能会导致更多的香烟消费。
本文旨在研究香烟税收结构与香烟消费之间的关系。
我们使用了来自 17 个国家的国际烟草控制政策评估项目的调查数据进行分析。将自我报告的香烟消费汇总为每个调查国家和波次的平均指标。在调整了社会人口特征、平均税收和年份固定效应后,使用广义估计方程来估计税收结构对香烟消费的影响。
我们的研究为税收结构与香烟消费之间的关系提供了重要的经验证据。我们发现,从特定到从价结构的转变与香烟消费增加 6%-11%有关。此外,从统一到分层结构的转变与香烟消费增加 34%-65%有关。这些结果与现有证据一致,表明统一和特定的税收结构是减少烟草消费最有效的税收结构。