Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Department of Exercise Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Oct;42(10):1804-1811. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0110-5. Epub 2018 May 24.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Obesity has been declared a disease by the American and Canadian Medical Associations. Although these declarations sparked much debate as to the impact of framing obesity as a disease on weight bias, strong empirical research is needed to examine this impact. The current study examined the impact of framing obesity a disease on weight bias, focusing on moderating and mediating processes.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A sample of 309 participants living in the United States or Canada was recruited from Crowdflower. Participants completed measures of demographics, ideology, general attitudes, and previous contact quality and quantity with people living with obesity. Participants then read one of three articles as part of an experimental manipulation framing obesity as a disease, obesity not as a disease, and a control article unrelated to obesity. Post-manipulation included measures of affect, disgust, empathy, blame, and weight bias.
Orthogonal contrasts were used to compare the obesity-disease condition to the obesity-not-disease condition and control condition. The manipulation had a direct effect on affect (emotions), such that affect toward individuals with obesity was more positive in the obesity-disease condition than the obesity-not-disease and control condition combined. Exploration of moderating effects revealed that both the belief in a just world and weight satisfaction moderated the relationship between the obesity-disease manipulation and blame for obesity. Two models of indirect effects on weight bias were also examined, which demonstrated that the obesity-disease manipulation predicted less weight bias through more positive affect (model 1) as well as less weight bias through decreased blame among individuals high in belief in a just world (model 2).
This study further highlights the complex effects of declaring obesity a disease, uncovering a new direction for future research into the role of affect as well as indirect effects of characterising obesity a disease on weight bias.
背景/目的:美国和加拿大医学会已宣布肥胖为一种疾病。尽管这些声明引发了很多关于将肥胖定义为疾病对体重偏见的影响的争论,但需要强有力的实证研究来检验这种影响。本研究考察了将肥胖定义为疾病对体重偏见的影响,重点关注调节和中介过程。
受试者/方法:从 Crowdflower 招募了 309 名居住在美国或加拿大的参与者。参与者完成了人口统计学、意识形态、一般态度以及与肥胖患者的先前接触质量和数量的测量。然后,参与者阅读了三篇文章中的一篇,这些文章是作为肥胖定义为疾病、肥胖不是疾病以及与肥胖无关的对照文章的实验操作的一部分。操作后包括对情绪、厌恶、同理心、责备和体重偏见的测量。
正交对比用于比较肥胖疾病状况与肥胖非疾病状况和对照状况。该操作对情绪(情感)有直接影响,即肥胖患者的情绪在肥胖疾病状况下比肥胖非疾病状况和对照状况的总和更为积极。对调节作用的探索表明,公正世界信念和体重满意度都调节了肥胖疾病操作与肥胖责备之间的关系。还检验了体重偏见的两个间接效应模型,这些模型表明,肥胖疾病操作通过更积极的情绪(模型 1)以及在公正世界信念较高的个体中通过减少对肥胖的责备(模型 2)来预测较少的体重偏见。
本研究进一步强调了宣布肥胖为疾病的复杂影响,揭示了未来研究肥胖特征对体重偏见的影响的新方向,包括情感的间接影响以及肥胖定义为疾病的间接影响。