Koplin Julian J
Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):429-440. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9857-6. Epub 2018 May 25.
In Markets Without Limits and a series of related papers, Jason Brennan and Peter Jaworski argue that it is morally permissible to buy and sell anything that it is morally permissible to possess and exchange outside of the market. Accordingly, we should (Brennan and Jaworski argue) open markets in "contested commodities" including blood, gametes, surrogacy services, and transplantable organs. This paper clarifies some important aspects of the case for market boundaries and in so doing shows why there are in fact moral limits to the market. I argue that the case for restricting the scope of the market does not (as Brennan and Jaworski assume) turn on the idea that some things are constitutively non-market goods; it turns instead on the idea that treating some things according to market norms would threaten the realization of particular kinds of human interests.
在《无限制的市场》及一系列相关论文中,贾森·布伦南和彼得·乔沃斯基认为,在市场之外道德上允许拥有和交换的任何东西,在市场中买卖也是道德上允许的。因此,我们应该(布伦南和乔沃斯基认为)开放“有争议商品”的市场,包括血液、配子、代孕服务和可移植器官。本文阐明了市场边界论证的一些重要方面,并以此说明为何实际上市场存在道德限制。我认为,限制市场范围的理由并非(如布伦南和乔沃斯基所设想的)基于某些东西本质上是非市场商品的观点;相反,它基于这样一种观点,即按照市场规范对待某些东西会威胁到特定人类利益的实现。