• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测抑郁症领域常规治疗和混合治疗的治疗成功率。

Predicting therapy success for treatment as usual and blended treatment in the domain of depression.

作者信息

van Breda Ward, Bremer Vincent, Becker Dennis, Hoogendoorn Mark, Funk Burkhardt, Ruwaard Jeroen, Riper Heleen

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Institute of Information Systems, Leuphana University, Luneburg, Germany.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2018 Jun;12:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.08.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2017.08.003
PMID:29862165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5945603/
Abstract

In this paper, we explore the potential of predicting therapy success for patients in mental health care. Such predictions can eventually improve the process of matching effective therapy types to individuals. In the EU project E-COMPARED, a variety of information is gathered about patients suffering from depression. We use this data, where 276 patients received treatment as usual and 227 received blended treatment, to investigate to what extent we are able to predict therapy success. We utilize different encoding strategies for preprocessing, varying feature selection techniques, and different statistical procedures for this purpose. Significant predictive power is found with average AUC values up to 0.7628 for treatment as usual and 0.7765 for blended treatment. Adding daily assessment data for blended treatment does currently not add predictive accuracy. Cost effectiveness analysis is needed to determine the added potential for real-world applications.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了预测精神卫生保健患者治疗成功可能性的潜力。此类预测最终可改善将有效治疗类型与个体进行匹配的过程。在欧盟项目E - COMPARED中,收集了有关抑郁症患者的各种信息。我们使用这些数据(其中276名患者接受常规治疗,227名患者接受混合治疗)来研究我们在多大程度上能够预测治疗成功。为此,我们采用不同的编码策略进行预处理,运用不同的特征选择技术,并采用不同的统计程序。结果发现,对于常规治疗,平均AUC值高达0.7628时具有显著的预测能力;对于混合治疗,平均AUC值高达0.7765时具有显著的预测能力。目前添加混合治疗的每日评估数据并不能提高预测准确性。需要进行成本效益分析以确定在实际应用中的附加潜力。

相似文献

1
Predicting therapy success for treatment as usual and blended treatment in the domain of depression.预测抑郁症领域常规治疗和混合治疗的治疗成功率。
Internet Interv. 2018 Jun;12:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.08.003.
2
European COMPARative Effectiveness research on blended Depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries.欧洲混合式抑郁症治疗与常规治疗的比较效果研究(E-COMPARED):一项在八个欧洲国家开展的随机对照非劣效性试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Aug 3;17(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1511-1.
3
Effectiveness of blended depression treatment for adults in specialised mental healthcare: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.成人在专科精神卫生保健中采用混合式抑郁症治疗的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 21;16:113. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0818-5.
4
Predicting Therapy Success and Costs for Personalized Treatment Recommendations Using Baseline Characteristics: Data-Driven Analysis.利用基线特征预测个性化治疗建议的治疗成功率和成本:数据驱动分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 21;20(8):e10275. doi: 10.2196/10275.
5
Blended care vs. usual care in the treatment of depressive symptoms and disorders in general practice [BLENDING]: study protocol of a non-inferiority randomized trial.综合医疗与常规医疗在全科医疗中治疗抑郁症状和障碍的比较[综合医疗研究]:一项非劣效性随机试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 13;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1376-1.
6
Unraveling the Black Box: Exploring Usage Patterns of a Blended Treatment for Depression in a Multicenter Study.揭开黑箱之谜:在一项多中心研究中探索抑郁症混合疗法的使用模式。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jul 25;6(7):e12707. doi: 10.2196/12707.
7
Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.美国东部地区遥感气溶胶光学厚度与PM2.5之间关系的评估及统计建模
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 May(167):5-83; discussion 85-91.
8
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Clinically Depressed Adolescents: Protocol for a Pragmatic Quasi-Experimental Controlled Trial.混合认知行为疗法对临床抑郁症青少年的有效性和成本效益:一项实用的准实验对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Oct 7;8(10):e13434. doi: 10.2196/13434.
9
Using the Personalized Advantage Index for Individual Treatment Allocation to Blended Treatment or Treatment as Usual for Depression in Secondary Care.在二级医疗中使用个性化优势指数进行个体治疗分配,以确定是接受混合治疗还是常规抑郁症治疗。
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 11;9(2):490. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020490.
10
A patient perspective on advantages and disadvantages of blended cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: A qualitative content analysis.患者对抑郁症混合认知行为疗法优缺点的看法:定性内容分析。
Psychother Res. 2019 Nov;29(8):986-998. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1430910. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of individual patient outcomes to psychotherapy vs medication for major depression.重度抑郁症患者接受心理治疗与药物治疗的个体预后预测。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2025 Feb 5;4(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s44184-025-00119-9.
2
Comparison between clinician and machine learning prediction in a randomized controlled trial for nonsuicidal self-injury.非自杀性自伤随机对照试验中临床医生与机器学习预测的比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06391-x.
3
A primer on the use of machine learning to distil knowledge from data in biological psychiatry.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Change in Therapeutic Alliance to Predict Youth Mental Health Outcomes.审视治疗联盟的变化以预测青少年心理健康结果。
J Emot Behav Disord. 2015 Jun 1;23(2):90-100. doi: 10.1177/1063426614541700.
2
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).新的 EQ-5D 五维版本(EQ-5D-5L)的制定和初步测试。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
3
Defining successful treatment outcome in depression using the PHQ-9: a comparison of methods.
机器学习在生物精神病学中从数据中提取知识的基础教程。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;29(2):387-401. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02334-2. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
Deep learning for the prediction of clinical outcomes in internet-delivered CBT for depression and anxiety.深度学习在互联网 delivered CBT 治疗抑郁和焦虑的临床结局预测中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0272685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272685. eCollection 2023.
5
Waiting for a digital therapist: three challenges on the path to psychotherapy delivered by artificial intelligence.等待数字治疗师:人工智能提供心理治疗之路上的三大挑战。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 1;14:1190084. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1190084. eCollection 2023.
6
Blended Therapies and Mobile Phones for Improving the Health of Female Victims of Gender Violence.混合疗法与手机用于改善性别暴力女性受害者的健康状况
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 26;10(3):445. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030445.
7
The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry.机器学习在预测精神病学治疗结果方面的前景。
World Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;20(2):154-170. doi: 10.1002/wps.20882.
8
Developing a Process for the Analysis of User Journeys and the Prediction of Dropout in Digital Health Interventions: Machine Learning Approach.开发一种用于分析用户旅程和预测数字健康干预措施中辍学的方法:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 28;22(10):e17738. doi: 10.2196/17738.
9
Using the Personalized Advantage Index for Individual Treatment Allocation to Blended Treatment or Treatment as Usual for Depression in Secondary Care.在二级医疗中使用个性化优势指数进行个体治疗分配,以确定是接受混合治疗还是常规抑郁症治疗。
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 11;9(2):490. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020490.
10
Predicting Therapy Success and Costs for Personalized Treatment Recommendations Using Baseline Characteristics: Data-Driven Analysis.利用基线特征预测个性化治疗建议的治疗成功率和成本:数据驱动分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 21;20(8):e10275. doi: 10.2196/10275.
使用 PHQ-9 定义抑郁症的成功治疗结局:方法比较。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Dec;127(1-3):122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.04.030. Epub 2010 May 31.
4
Ecological momentary assessment.生态瞬时评估
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415.
5
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
6
The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation.公共部门心境障碍患者的抑郁症状量表临床医生评定版(IDS-C)与自评版(IDS-SR)以及快速抑郁症状量表临床医生评定版(QIDS-C)与自评版(QIDS-SR):一项心理测量学评估
Psychol Med. 2004 Jan;34(1):73-82. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703001107.
7
The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.PHQ-9:一种简短抑郁严重程度测量工具的效度
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
8
The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.《迷你国际神经精神病学访谈量表(M.I.N.I.)》:一种针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)的结构化诊断性精神科访谈量表的开发与验证
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.
9
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的意义及应用。
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
10
Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.比较两条或多条相关的受试者工作特征曲线下的面积:一种非参数方法。
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45.