Suppr超能文献

种植体-基台比与种植体周围骨吸收及种植体二次稳定性的临床研究:36 个月随访

The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.

机构信息

Department of Dental Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wrocław, Poland.

Department of Oral Implantology, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wrocław, Poland.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 16;2018:4246874. doi: 10.1155/2018/4246874. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

When the era of dental implantology began, the pioneers defined some gold standards used in dental prosthetics treatment for implant-supported restorations. Referring to traditional prosthetics, it was taken for granted that the length of an implant placed in the alveolar bone (the equivalent of the root) should exceed the length of the superstructure.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of the study was to determine whether implant length and the crown-to-implant (/) ratio influence implant stability and the loss of the surrounding marginal bone and whether short implants can be used instead of sinus augmentation procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients participating in the study ( = 30) had one single tooth implant, a short (OsseoSpeed™ L6 Ø4 mm, Implants) or a regular implant (OsseoSpeed L11 and L13 Ø4 mm, DENTSPLY Implants), placed in the maxilla. The evaluation was based on clinical and radiological examination. The crown-to-implant ratio was determined by dividing the length of the crown together with the abutment by the length of the implant placed crestally. Mean crown-to-implant ratios were calculated separately for each group and its correlation with the MBL (marginal bone loss) and stability was assessed. The authors compared the correlation between the / ratio values, MBL, and secondary implant stability.

RESULTS

Positive results in terms of primary and secondary stability were achieved with both (short and conventional) implants. The MBL was low for short and conventional implants being 0.34 ± 0.24 mm and 0.22 ± 0.46 mm, respectively. No significant correlation was found between the / ratio and secondary stability as well as the / ratio and the marginal bone loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Short implants can be successfully used to support single crowns. The study has revealed no significant differences in the clinical performance of prosthetic restorations supported by short implants. Clinical trial registration number is NCT03471000.

摘要

简介

当牙科种植学时代开始时,先驱们为种植体支持修复制定了一些在牙科修复治疗中使用的金标准。参照传统修复学,人们认为植入牙槽骨(相当于牙根)的种植体长度应超过上部结构的长度,这是理所当然的。

目的

本研究旨在确定种植体长度和冠根比是否会影响种植体稳定性和周围边缘骨的丧失,以及短种植体是否可以替代鼻窦提升术。

材料和方法

参与研究的患者(n=30)上颌骨中植入一颗单牙种植体,包括短种植体(OsseoSpeed™ L6 Ø4mm,Implants)或常规种植体(OsseoSpeed L11 和 L13 Ø4mm,DENTSPLY Implants)。评估基于临床和影像学检查。通过将冠和基台的长度与植入牙槽嵴的长度相除,确定冠根比。分别计算每组的平均冠根比,并评估其与 MBL(边缘骨丧失)和稳定性的相关性。作者比较了 / 比值、MBL 和二次种植体稳定性之间的相关性。

结果

两种(短和常规)种植体均获得了初级和次级稳定性的阳性结果。短种植体和常规种植体的 MBL 均较低,分别为 0.34±0.24mm 和 0.22±0.46mm。未发现 / 比值与二次稳定性以及 / 比值与边缘骨丧失之间存在显著相关性。

结论

短种植体可成功用于支持单冠。研究表明,短种植体支持的修复体在临床性能上没有显著差异。临床试验注册号为 NCT03471000。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e410/5976988/055d76424a55/BMRI2018-4246874.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验