• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞争的四个维度:多维竞争取向量表的编制

The Four Faces of Competition: The Development of the Multidimensional Competitive Orientation Inventory.

作者信息

Orosz Gábor, Tóth-Király István, Büki Noémi, Ivaskevics Krisztián, Bőthe Beáta, Fülöp Márta

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 May 22;9:779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00779. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00779
PMID:29872415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5972296/
Abstract

To date, no short scale exists with established factor structure that can assess individual differences in competition. The aim of the present study was to uncover and operationalize the facets of competitive orientations with theoretical underpinning and strong psychometric properties. A total of 2676 respondents were recruited for four studies. The items were constructed based on qualitative research in different cultural contexts. A combined method of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed. ESEM resulted in a four-factor structure of the competitive orientations and this structure was supported by a series of CFAs on different comprehensive samples. The Multidimensional Competitive Orientation Inventory (MCOI) included 12 items and four factors: hypercompetitive orientation, self-developmental competitive orientation, anxiety-driven competition avoidance, and lack of interest toward competition. Strong gender invariance was established. The four facets of competition have differentiated relationship patterns with adaptive and maladaptive personality and motivational constructs. The MCOI can assess the adaptive and maladaptive facets of competitive orientations with a short, reliable, valid and theoretically underlined multidimensional measure.

摘要

迄今为止,尚无已确立因素结构的简短量表能够评估竞争中的个体差异。本研究的目的是揭示并实施具有理论基础和强大心理测量特性的竞争取向维度。四项研究共招募了2676名受访者。这些项目是基于不同文化背景下的定性研究构建的。采用了探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)和验证性因素分析(CFA)相结合的方法。ESEM得出了竞争取向的四因素结构,并且这一结构得到了针对不同综合样本的一系列CFA的支持。多维竞争取向量表(MCOI)包括12个项目和四个因素:过度竞争取向、自我发展竞争取向、焦虑驱动的竞争回避以及对竞争缺乏兴趣。建立了强大的性别不变性。竞争的这四个维度与适应性和适应不良的人格及动机结构具有不同的关系模式。MCOI能够通过一种简短、可靠、有效且有理论依据的多维测量方法来评估竞争取向的适应性和适应不良维度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e64/5972296/0a2e209efda2/fpsyg-09-00779-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e64/5972296/0a2e209efda2/fpsyg-09-00779-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e64/5972296/0a2e209efda2/fpsyg-09-00779-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Four Faces of Competition: The Development of the Multidimensional Competitive Orientation Inventory.竞争的四个维度:多维竞争取向量表的编制
Front Psychol. 2018 May 22;9:779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00779. eCollection 2018.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Competitive Orientation Inventory.多维竞争取向量表中文版的心理计量学评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6591. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57359-6.
3
A Bifactor-ESEM Representation of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.感知社会支持多维量表的双因素-扩展结构方程模型表示
Psychol Rep. 2023 Oct 20:332941231206992. doi: 10.1177/00332941231206992.
4
Testing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender of the Big Five Inventory Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.通过探索性结构方程模型检验大五人格量表的因素结构及性别间测量不变性
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(1):88-99. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1035381. Epub 2015 May 1.
5
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.验证性因子分析(CFA)、探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)和集束-探索性结构方程建模(Set-ESEM):拟合优度与简约性之间的最佳平衡。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;55(1):102-119. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.探索性结构方程模型:探索性和验证性因子分析最佳特征的整合。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
7
Aspects of Identity Questionnaire-IV: An Examination of Structural Validity, Gender Invariance, and Relationships with Mental Health and Basic Psychological Needs Among Adolescents.身份认同问卷-IV的各个方面:青少年的结构效度、性别不变性以及与心理健康和基本心理需求的关系研究
J Pers Assess. 2025 Jan-Feb;107(1):28-40. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2367546. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
8
Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects.大五因素在整个生命周期中的测量不变性:性别、年龄、可塑性、成熟度和甜蜜生活效应的 ESEM 检验。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;49(6):1194-1218. doi: 10.1037/a0026913. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
9
The Quest for Comparability: Studying the Invariance of the Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES) Measure across Countries.追求可比性:研究教师自我效能感量表(TSES)在不同国家的不变性
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 9;11(3):e0150829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150829. eCollection 2016.
10
A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.通过探索性结构方程建模重新审视大五因素结构。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):471-91. doi: 10.1037/a0019227.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of competition on exercise intensity and the user experience of exercise, during virtual reality bicycling for healthy adults across the lifespan.在虚拟现实自行车运动中,竞争对各年龄段健康成年人运动强度和运动体验的影响。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Aug 8;17(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01253-9.
2
Competitiveness versus cooperativeness linked to leisure activities in young university students in Spain.西班牙青年大学生休闲活动中的竞争与合作
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 31;13(1):852. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03190-1.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the contesting orientations scale among Chinese undergraduates.

本文引用的文献

1
An Illustration of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) Framework on the Passion Scale.探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)框架在激情量表上的一个示例。
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 7;8:1968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01968. eCollection 2017.
2
The Development of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS).问题色情制品消费量表(PPCS)的编制。
J Sex Res. 2018 Mar-Apr;55(3):395-406. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1291798. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.
中文版竞争取向量表在中国大学生中的心理测量学特性。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 14;16:1504580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1504580. eCollection 2025.
4
The Effects of Competition on Exercise Intensity and the User Experience of Exercise during Virtual Reality Bicycling for Young Adults.竞争对年轻人虚拟现实自行车运动中运动强度和用户体验的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 26;24(21):6873. doi: 10.3390/s24216873.
5
The link between social comparison orientation and domain-specific risk-taking: exploring the mediating role of two dimensions of trait competitiveness.社会比较取向与特定领域冒险行为之间的联系:探究特质竞争力两个维度的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 4;15:1340009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340009. eCollection 2024.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Competitive Orientation Inventory.多维竞争取向量表中文版的心理计量学评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6591. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57359-6.
7
Gender differences in competitiveness and fear of failure help explain why girls have lower life satisfaction than boys in gender equal countries.在性别平等的国家,竞争意识和对失败的恐惧方面的性别差异有助于解释为何女孩的生活满意度低于男孩。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1131837. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131837. eCollection 2023.
8
How Does Job Insecurity Affect Workplace Harassment? The Interaction Effect of Hypercompetitive Attitude, Coworker Impression Management, and Leader Narcissism.工作不安全感如何影响职场骚扰?过度竞争态度、同事印象管理和领导者自恋的交互作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:753061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753061. eCollection 2021.
9
The development of the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder Scale (CSBD-19): An ICD-11 based screening measure across three languages.《强迫性性行为障碍量表(CSBD-19)的编制:基于 ICD-11 的三种语言筛查工具》
J Behav Addict. 2020 Jun 16;9(2):247-258. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00034. Print 2020 Jun.
评估双因子模型:计算和解释统计指数。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):137-50. doi: 10.1037/met0000045. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
4
The Internal Structure of Responses to the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.《特质情商问卷简版反应的内部结构:探索性结构方程建模方法》
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(4):411-23. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1014042. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
The short form of the revised almost perfect scale.修订后几乎完美量表的简表形式。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(3):368-79. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.838172. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
6
Are competition and extrinsic motivation reliable predictors of academic cheating?竞争和外在动机是学术作弊的可靠预测因素吗?
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 27;4:87. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00087. eCollection 2013.
7
Concurrent and prospective analyses of peer, television and social media influences on body dissatisfaction, eating disorder symptoms and life satisfaction in adolescent girls.青少年女孩中同伴、电视和社交媒体对身体不满、饮食障碍症状和生活满意度的同期和前瞻性分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jan;43(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9898-9. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
8
Divided attention selectively impairs memory for self-relevant information.注意分散会选择性地损害与自我相关的信息记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2013 May;41(4):503-10. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0279-0.
9
The competition-performance relation: a meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance.竞争表现关系:对竞争与表现的对立过程模型的元分析综述与检验。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1035-70. doi: 10.1037/a0028324.
10
The positivity scale.阳性量表。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):701-12. doi: 10.1037/a0026681. Epub 2012 Jan 16.