Neshteruk C D, Mazzucca S, Østbye T, Ward D S
Department of Nutrition, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Sep;44(5):746-752. doi: 10.1111/cch.12578. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
Family childcare homes (FCCHs) are the second largest provider of childcare in the United States, yet little is known about how this setting influences children's physical activity, particularly related to the physical environment. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine what aspects of the FCCH physical environment facilitate or hinder children's physical activity.
Data were collected from 166 FCCH providers and 496 preschool-aged children in 2013-2014 as part of the Keys to Healthy FCCHs study. Children's moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was measured using Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers. Wear data from the childcare day were isolated, and cut-points were applied in order to calculate children's minutes of MVPA per hour. FCCH-level estimates of child MVPA per hour were calculated. Indoor and outdoor physical environment characteristics were assessed during a 2-day observation using the Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation modified for FCCHs. General linear models were used to examine the relationship between indoor, portable play equipment, and outdoor FCCH physical environment characteristics and children's MVPA per hour.
Only indoor play space was significantly associated with children's MVPA (β = 0.33; p = .034), indicating that when provided with more indoor space for active play, children were more physically active. No significant associations were noted between portable play equipment or the outdoor environment and children's MVPA.
Indoor space was the only physical environment characteristic associated with children's MVPA, suggesting that teaching FCCH providers how to best utilize their indoor play space for active play may be a way to promote children's physical activity. Futures studies should explore the impact of other environmental characteristics of the FCCH (e.g., provider practices and policies) on children's physical activity.
家庭托育之家(FCCHs)是美国第二大儿童保育服务提供者,但对于这种环境如何影响儿童的身体活动,尤其是与物理环境相关的影响,我们知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是确定家庭托育之家物理环境的哪些方面促进或阻碍了儿童的身体活动。
作为“健康家庭托育之家的关键”研究的一部分,在2013 - 2014年收集了166名家庭托育之家提供者和496名学龄前儿童的数据。使用Actigraph GT3X +加速度计测量儿童的中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)。隔离保育日的佩戴数据,并应用切点来计算儿童每小时的MVPA分钟数。计算了家庭托育之家每小时儿童MVPA的水平估计值。在为期2天的观察期间,使用针对家庭托育之家进行修改的环境与政策评估及观察工具,对室内和室外物理环境特征进行评估。使用一般线性模型来检验室内、便携式游乐设备和室外家庭托育之家物理环境特征与儿童每小时MVPA之间的关系。
只有室内游戏空间与儿童的MVPA显著相关(β = 0.33;p = 0.034),这表明当有更多的室内空间用于积极游戏时,儿童的身体活动更活跃。便携式游乐设备或室外环境与儿童的MVPA之间未发现显著关联。
室内空间是与儿童MVPA相关的唯一物理环境特征,这表明教导家庭托育之家提供者如何最好地利用其室内游戏空间进行积极游戏可能是促进儿童身体活动的一种方式。未来的研究应探讨家庭托育之家的其他环境特征(如提供者的做法和政策)对儿童身体活动的影响。