Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Apr;26:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 23.
We review two fundamentally different ways that decision time is related to cooperation. First, studies have experimentally manipulated decision time to understand how cooperation is related to the use of intuition versus deliberation. Current evidence supports the claim that time pressure (and, more generally, intuition) favors cooperation. Second, correlational studies reveal that self-paced decision times are primarily related to decision conflict, not the use of intuition or deliberation. As a result, extreme cooperation decisions occur more quickly than intermediate decisions, and the relative speed of highly cooperative versus non-cooperative decisions depends on details of the design and participant pool. Finally, we discuss interpersonal consequences of decision time: people are judged based on how quickly they cooperate, and decision time is used as a cue to predict cooperation.
我们回顾了决策时间与合作相关的两种截然不同的方式。首先，研究通过实验操纵决策时间来理解合作与使用直觉和深思熟虑之间的关系。目前的证据支持这样一种观点，即时间压力（更广泛地说，直觉）有利于合作。其次，相关研究表明，自主决策时间主要与决策冲突有关，而不是与使用直觉或深思熟虑有关。因此，极端合作的决策比中间决策发生得更快，而高度合作与非合作决策的相对速度取决于设计和参与者群体的细节。最后，我们讨论了决策时间的人际后果：人们根据合作的速度来进行判断，决策时间被用作预测合作的线索。
