1 School of Nursing, Columbia University , New York, New York.
2 Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University , New York, New York.
LGBT Health. 2018 Jul;5(5):284-294. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2017.0220. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
Despite higher rates of modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in gay and bisexual men, few studies have examined sexual orientation differences in CVD among men. The purpose of this study was to examine sexual orientation differences in modifiable risk factors for CVD and CVD diagnoses in men.
A secondary analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2012) was conducted. Multiple imputation was performed for missing values. Differences across four distinct groups were analyzed: gay-identified men, bisexual-identified men, heterosexual-identified men who have sex with men (MSM), and heterosexual-identified men who denied same-sex behavior (categorized as exclusively heterosexual). Multiple logistic regression models were run with exclusively heterosexual men as the reference group.
The analytic sample consisted of 7731 men. No differences between heterosexual-identified MSM and exclusively heterosexual men were observed. Few differences in health behaviors were noted, except that, compared to exclusively heterosexual men, gay-identified men reported lower binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37-0.85). Bisexual-identified men had higher rates of mental distress (AOR 2.39, 95% CI = 1.46-3.90), obesity (AOR 1.69, 95% CI = 1.02-2.72), elevated blood pressure (AOR 2.30, 95% CI = 1.43-3.70), and glycosylated hemoglobin (AOR 3.01, 95% CI = 1.38-6.59) relative to exclusively heterosexual men.
Gay-identified and heterosexual-identified MSM demonstrated similar CVD risk to exclusively heterosexual men, whereas bisexual-identified men had elevations in several risk factors. Future directions for sexual minority health research in this area and the need for CVD and mental health screenings, particularly in bisexual-identified men, are highlighted.
尽管男同性恋和双性恋男性心血管疾病 (CVD) 的可改变风险因素发生率更高,但很少有研究探讨男性 CVD 中与性取向相关的差异。本研究旨在探讨男同性恋和双性恋男性 CVD 及其相关诊断中可改变的 CVD 风险因素的性取向差异。
对全国健康和营养调查 (2001-2012 年) 进行了二次分析。对缺失值进行了多重插补。对四个不同群体进行了分析:同性恋男性、双性恋男性、异性恋男性但有同性性行为 (归类为绝对异性恋)、异性恋男性否认同性性行为 (归类为绝对异性恋)。以绝对异性恋男性为参照组,采用多变量逻辑回归模型。
分析样本由 7731 名男性组成。与绝对异性恋的男同性恋男性相比,异性恋男性的 MSM 并无差异。健康行为方面的差异很小,除了与绝对异性恋男性相比,同性恋男性报告的暴饮风险较低 (校正比值比 [AOR] 0.58,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.37-0.85)。与绝对异性恋男性相比,双性恋男性的心理困扰 (AOR 2.39,95% CI = 1.46-3.90)、肥胖 (AOR 1.69,95% CI = 1.02-2.72)、血压升高 (AOR 2.30,95% CI = 1.43-3.70)、糖化血红蛋白 (AOR 3.01,95% CI = 1.38-6.59) 的比率更高。
同性恋和异性恋男性 MSM 的 CVD 风险与绝对异性恋男性相似,而双性恋男性的几种风险因素增加。本研究强调了该领域的性少数群体健康研究的未来方向,以及需要对双性恋男性进行 CVD 和心理健康筛查。