Li Yun-Shan, Ootsuyama Yuko, Kawasaki Yuya, Morimoto Yasuo, Higashi Toshiaki, Kawai Kazuaki
Department of Environmental Oncology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan.
Department of Occupational Pneumology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan.
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2018 May;62(3):238-241. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.17-70. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
Nanoparticles are widely used as useful industrial materials. Therefore, their possible adverse health effects must be appraised. We assessed and compared the oxidative DNA damage caused by four different nanoparticles (TiO, NiO, ZnO and CeO). The effects of the administration methods, intratracheal instillation and inhalation, were also evaluated. Rats were subjected to intratracheal instillations or 4 weeks of inhalation exposure to the nanoparticles, and the 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels in the lung were analyzed by an HPLC-EC detector method. The 8-OHdG levels were increased in a dose-dependent manner with the inhalation of NiO. ZnO also increased the 8-OHdG levels with inhalation. In comparison with the control, the 8-OHdG levels were significantly and persistently higher with the CeO nanoparticle administration, by both intratracheal instillation and inhalation. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the 8-OHdG levels between the control and TiO nanoparticle-treated groups, with either intratracheal instillation or inhalation during the observation period. These results indicated that NiO, ZnO and CeO nanoparticles generate significant amounts of free radicals, and oxidative stress may be responsible for the lung injury caused by these nanoparticles. In addition, both intratracheal instillation and inhalation exposure induced similar tendencies of oxidative DNA damage with these nanoparticles.
纳米颗粒作为有用的工业材料被广泛使用。因此,必须评估它们可能对健康产生的不利影响。我们评估并比较了四种不同纳米颗粒(二氧化钛、氧化镍、氧化锌和氧化铈)引起的氧化性DNA损伤。还评估了气管内滴注和吸入这两种给药方式的影响。对大鼠进行纳米颗粒的气管内滴注或4周的吸入暴露,并通过高效液相色谱 - 电化学检测器法分析肺中的8 - 羟基脱氧鸟苷(8 - OHdG)水平。吸入氧化镍后,8 - OHdG水平呈剂量依赖性增加。吸入氧化锌也会增加8 - OHdG水平。与对照组相比,通过气管内滴注和吸入给予氧化铈纳米颗粒后,8 - OHdG水平均显著且持续升高。相比之下,在观察期内,无论是气管内滴注还是吸入,对照组与二氧化钛纳米颗粒处理组之间的8 - OHdG水平均无显著差异。这些结果表明,氧化镍、氧化锌和氧化铈纳米颗粒会产生大量自由基,氧化应激可能是这些纳米颗粒导致肺损伤的原因。此外,气管内滴注和吸入暴露在这些纳米颗粒引起的氧化性DNA损伤方面表现出相似的趋势。