• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改变美国神经病学政策格局:关于癫痫的误解与事实。

Changing the neurology policy landscape in the United States: Misconceptions and facts about epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115-5899, USA.

UCB Pharma, 1950 Lake Park Drive SE, Smyrna, GA 30080, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2018 Jul;122(7):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.012
PMID:29908672
Abstract

Epilepsy has a relatively high prevalence, and diagnosis and treatment are often challenging. Seizure freedom without significant side effects is the ultimate goal for both physicians and patients, but not always achievable. In those cases, the treatment goals of patients and providers may differ. In the United States, many clinicians continue to prescribe older AEDs, even though newer AEDs have a more desirable safety and tolerability profile, fewer drug-drug interactions, and are associated with lower epilepsy-related hospital visits. Newer AEDs are more commonly prescribed by neurologists and epilepsy center physicians, highlighting the importance of access to specialty care. We report that antiepileptic drugs are not the dominant cost driver for patients with epilepsy and costs are considerably higher in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. Poor drug adherence is considered a main cause of unsuccessful epilepsy treatment and is associated with increases in inpatient and emergency department admissions and related costs. Interventions and educational programs are needed to address the reasons for nonadherence. Coverage policies placing a higher cost burden on patients with epilepsy lead to lower treatment adherence, which can result in higher future health care spending. Epilepsy is lagging behind other neurological conditions in terms of funding and treatment innovation. Increased investment in epilepsy research may be particularly beneficial given current funding levels and the high prevalence of epilepsy.

摘要

癫痫的发病率相对较高,其诊断和治疗往往具有挑战性。对于医生和患者来说,达到无明显副作用且无发作的治疗目标是最终目标,但并非总是能够实现。在这种情况下,患者和提供者的治疗目标可能存在差异。在美国,许多临床医生仍然开处方使用较老的抗癫痫药物,尽管较新的抗癫痫药物具有更理想的安全性和耐受性、较少的药物相互作用,并且与较低的癫痫相关住院就诊率相关。神经科医生和癫痫中心的医生更常开新型抗癫痫药物,这突出了获得专科护理的重要性。我们报告称,抗癫痫药物并不是癫痫患者的主要费用驱动因素,而未得到控制的癫痫患者的费用要高得多。药物依从性差被认为是癫痫治疗失败的主要原因,并且与住院和急诊就诊次数增加以及相关费用增加有关。需要采取干预措施和教育计划来解决不依从的原因。将更高的费用负担转嫁给癫痫患者的覆盖政策会导致治疗依从性降低,从而导致未来更高的医疗保健支出。在资金投入和治疗创新方面,癫痫落后于其他神经疾病。鉴于目前的资金水平和癫痫的高发病率,增加对癫痫研究的投资可能特别有益。

相似文献

1
Changing the neurology policy landscape in the United States: Misconceptions and facts about epilepsy.改变美国神经病学政策格局:关于癫痫的误解与事实。
Health Policy. 2018 Jul;122(7):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 26.
2
Economic impact of epilepsy and the cost of nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs in older Medicare beneficiaries.老年医疗保险受益人群中癫痫的经济影响及抗癫痫药物治疗不依从的成本
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Mar;80:208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
3
Impact of nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs on health care utilization and costs: findings from the RANSOM study.不依从抗癫痫药物对医疗保健利用和成本的影响:RANSOM研究结果
Epilepsia. 2009 Mar;50(3):501-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01794.x. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
4
Prevalence and cost of nonadherence with antiepileptic drugs in an adult managed care population.成人管理式医疗人群中抗癫痫药物治疗不依从的患病率及成本
Epilepsia. 2008 Mar;49(3):446-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01414.x. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
5
Prescribing antiepileptics for the elderly: differences between guideline recommendations and clinical practice.为老年人开具抗癫痫药物:指南建议与临床实践的差异
Drugs Aging. 2006;23(11):861-75. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623110-00002.
6
Burden of uncontrolled epilepsy in patients requiring an emergency room visit or hospitalization.需要急诊或住院的癫痫未控制患者的负担。
Neurology. 2012 Oct 30;79(18):1908-16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318271f77e. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
7
Uptake and costs of care for epilepsy: findings from a U.K. regional study.
Epilepsia. 1998 Jul;39(7):776-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01164.x.
8
Brief communication of assessment of clinical practice regarding pharmacological treatment of epilepsy: a survey of neurologists in Republic of Macedonia.
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):163-6.
9
Prevalence and cost of nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs in elderly patients with epilepsy.老年癫痫患者抗癫痫药物治疗依从性差的患病率及费用
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Feb;14(2):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.10.021. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
10
Evaluation and management of bone health in children with epilepsy on long-term antiepileptic drugs: United Kingdom survey of paediatric neurologists.长期服用抗癫痫药物的癫痫儿童的骨健康评估和管理:英国儿科神经科医生的调查。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2011 Sep;15(5):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing seizure control of patients with convulsive epilepsy in rural areas of northwest China.中国西北部农村地区惊厥性癫痫患者癫痫控制的影响因素
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Aug;10(4):1208-1216. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70100. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Polygenic risk scores as a marker for epilepsy risk across lifetime and after unspecified seizure events.多基因风险评分作为一生中及不明原因癫痫发作后癫痫风险的标志物。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 25;15(1):6277. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50295-z.
3
Polygenic risk scores as a marker for epilepsy risk across lifetime and after unspecified seizure events.
多基因风险评分作为终生及未明确癫痫发作事件后癫痫风险的标志物。
medRxiv. 2023 Nov 27:2023.11.27.23297542. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.27.23297542.
4
Psychosocial Basis of Human Sufferings and Poverty in Patients with Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.神经和精神疾病患者痛苦与贫困的社会心理基础
Med Res Arch. 2023 May;11(5). doi: 10.18103/mra.v11i5.3919. Epub 2023 May 20.
5
Attitudes Toward Epilepsy Among Parents of Children With Epilepsy in Southern China.中国南方癫痫患儿家长对癫痫的态度
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 5;11:602000. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.602000. eCollection 2020.