• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证应答标志物,以预测恶性胸腔积液(PROMISE)患者的生存和胸膜固定术成功率:一项多队列分析。

Development and validation of response markers to predict survival and pleurodesis success in patients with malignant pleural effusion (PROMISE): a multicohort analysis.

机构信息

Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Laboratory of Pleural and Lung Cancer Translational Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Laboratory of Pleural and Lung Cancer Translational Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):930-939. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30294-8. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30294-8
PMID:29908990
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of malignant pleural effusion is increasing worldwide, but prognostic biomarkers to plan treatment and to understand the underlying mechanisms of disease progression remain unidentified. The PROMISE study was designed with the objectives to discover, validate, and prospectively assess biomarkers of survival and pleurodesis response in malignant pleural effusion and build a score that predicts survival.

METHODS

In this multicohort study, we used five separate and independent datasets from randomised controlled trials to investigate potential biomarkers of survival and pleurodesis. Mass spectrometry-based discovery was used to investigate pleural fluid samples for differential protein expression in patients from the discovery group with different survival and pleurodesis outcomes. Clinical, radiological, and biological variables were entered into least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to build a model that predicts 3-month mortality. We evaluated the model using internal and external validation.

FINDINGS

17 biomarker candidates of survival and seven of pleurodesis were identified in the discovery dataset. Three independent datasets (n=502) were used for biomarker validation. All pleurodesis biomarkers failed, and gelsolin, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, versican, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP1) emerged as accurate predictors of survival. Eight variables (haemoglobin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, cancer type, pleural fluid TIMP1 concentrations, and previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy) were validated and used to develop a survival score. Internal validation with bootstrap resampling and external validation with 162 patients from two independent datasets showed good discrimination (C statistic values of 0·78 [95% CI 0·72-0·83] for internal validation and 0·89 [0·84-0·93] for external validation of the clinical PROMISE score).

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, the PROMISE score is the first prospectively validated prognostic model for malignant pleural effusion that combines biological and clinical parameters to accurately estimate 3-month mortality. It is a robust, clinically relevant prognostic score that can be applied immediately, provide important information on patient prognosis, and guide the selection of appropriate management strategies.

FUNDING

European Respiratory Society, Medical Research Funding-University of Oxford, Slater & Gordon Research Fund, and Oxfordshire Health Services Research Committee Research Grants.

摘要

背景

恶性胸腔积液的患病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势,但仍未发现用于规划治疗和了解疾病进展潜在机制的预后生物标志物。PROMISE 研究旨在发现、验证和前瞻性评估恶性胸腔积液中与生存和胸膜固定术反应相关的生物标志物,并构建预测生存的评分。

方法

在这项多队列研究中,我们使用五项来自随机对照试验的独立数据集,研究了与生存和胸膜固定术相关的潜在生物标志物。采用基于质谱的发现方法,对来自不同生存和胸膜固定术结局的发现组患者的胸腔积液样本进行差异蛋白表达分析。将临床、影像学和生物学变量输入最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归中,构建预测 3 个月死亡率的模型。我们使用内部和外部验证来评估该模型。

结果

在发现数据集中共鉴定出 17 个与生存相关和 7 个与胸膜固定术相关的生物标志物候选物。三个独立数据集(n=502)用于生物标志物验证。所有与胸膜固定术相关的生物标志物均未通过验证,而凝胶蛋白、巨噬细胞移动抑制因子、软骨寡聚基质蛋白和金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂 1(TIMP1)成为准确预测生存的标志物。验证了 8 个变量(血红蛋白、C 反应蛋白、白细胞计数、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态、癌症类型、胸腔积液 TIMP1 浓度以及既往化疗或放疗),并利用这些变量开发了一个生存评分。通过 bootstrap 重采样进行内部验证,以及使用来自两个独立数据集的 162 名患者进行外部验证,均显示出良好的区分度(内部验证的临床 PROMISE 评分的 C 统计值为 0.78[95%CI 0.72-0.83],外部验证为 0.89[0.84-0.93])。

结论

据我们所知,该评分是首个前瞻性验证的恶性胸腔积液预后模型,它将生物学和临床参数相结合,准确估计 3 个月死亡率。这是一个稳健、具有临床相关性的预后评分,可立即应用,为患者预后提供重要信息,并指导选择适当的管理策略。

资金

欧洲呼吸学会、牛津大学医学研究基金会、斯莱特和戈登研究基金以及牛津郡卫生服务研究委员会研究资助。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of response markers to predict survival and pleurodesis success in patients with malignant pleural effusion (PROMISE): a multicohort analysis.开发和验证应答标志物,以预测恶性胸腔积液(PROMISE)患者的生存和胸膜固定术成功率:一项多队列分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):930-939. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30294-8. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Analysis of Quality of Life after Pleurodesis in Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion.分析恶性胸腔积液患者胸膜固定术后的生活质量。
Respiration. 2019;98(6):467-472. doi: 10.1159/000502029. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Predictors for spontaneous pleurodesis in patients with indwelling pleural catheters for malignant pleural effusion: a safety net hospital experience.恶性胸腔积液留置胸腔导管患者自发性胸膜固定术的预测因素:一家安全网医院的经验
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251318844. doi: 10.1177/17534666251318844.
4
Talc pleurodesis improves survival of patients with malignant pleural effusions: case-control study.滑石粉胸膜固定术可提高恶性胸腔积液患者的生存率:病例对照研究。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 Dec;127(23-24):963-9. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0716-8. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
5
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
6
Survivin is a negative prognostic factor in malignant pleural effusion.Survivin 是恶性胸腔积液的一个预后不良因素。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2018 Apr;48(4). doi: 10.1111/eci.12895. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
Pleural fluid osteopontin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator levels as predictors of pleurodesis outcome and prognosticators in patients with malignant pleural effusion: a prospective cohort study.恶性胸腔积液患者胸膜固定术结局预测指标及预后因素:血清骨桥蛋白、血管内皮生长因子和尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物水平的前瞻性队列研究
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 13;16:463. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2529-1.
8
Malignant Pleural Effusion: Still a Long Way to Go.恶性胸腔积液:仍有很长的路要走。
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2019;14(1):24-30. doi: 10.2174/1574887114666181204105208.
9
Early and late mortality after pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion.恶性胸腔积液行胸膜固定术后的早期和晚期死亡率
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Jul;74(1):213-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03599-3.
10
Predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion: development and validation of the LENT prognostic score.预测恶性胸腔积液的生存率:LENT预后评分的制定与验证
Thorax. 2014 Dec;69(12):1098-104. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205285. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation of the LENT and PROMISE prognostic scores for malignant pleural effusion.恶性胸腔积液LENT和PROMISE预后评分的外部验证
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jun 16;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.01019-2024. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Malignant Pleural Effusion: Palliative Managements and Indication for Pleurodesis Based on Survival Scores.恶性胸腔积液:基于生存评分的姑息治疗及胸膜固定术指征
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul;132(1):35-44. doi: 10.1002/jso.28156. Epub 2025 May 20.
3
Malignant Pleural Effusion: Diagnosis and Treatment-Up-to-Date Perspective.
恶性胸腔积液:诊断与治疗——最新视角。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Nov 2;31(11):6867-6878. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31110507.
4
Mortality after treatment of malignant pleural effusions with indwelling pleural catheters versus chemical pleurodesis: a population-based study.留置胸腔导管与化学性胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液的死亡率:一项基于人群的研究。
Respir Res. 2024 Nov 13;25(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03023-6.
5
Lymph nodes rather than pleural metabolic activity in F-FDG PET/CT correlates with malignant pleural effusion recurrence in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.在晚期非小细胞肺癌中,F-FDG PET/CT检查显示的是淋巴结而非胸膜的代谢活性与恶性胸腔积液复发相关。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 30;13(9):2236-2253. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-291. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
6
Comparison of five scores to predict mortality in malignant pleural effusion.五种预测恶性胸腔积液死亡率评分的比较。
Updates Surg. 2024 Dec;76(8):2885-2892. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01985-2. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
7
Ovarian endometrioma recurrence after laparoscopic surgery: First assessment of ACSAP predicting score.腹腔镜手术后卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿复发:ACSAP预测评分的首次评估
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jan 1;21(1):39-45. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_350_23. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
8
Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Multidisciplinary Approach.恶性胸腔积液:多学科治疗方法
Open Respir Arch. 2024 Jun 19;6(4):100349. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100349. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
9
Malignant pleural disease.恶性胸膜疾病
Breathe (Sheff). 2023 Dec;19(4):230145. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0145-2023. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10
Malignant pleural effusion: current understanding and therapeutic approach.恶性胸腔积液:当前的认识和治疗方法。
Respir Res. 2024 Jan 19;25(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02684-7.