Barrett Steve, McLaren Shaun, Spears Iain, Ward Patrick, Weston Matthew
Sports Medicine and Science Department, Hull City FC, Kingston Upon Hull HU16 4HB, UK.
Sport Science and Medical Department, Hartlepool United Football Club, Hartlepool TS24 8BZ, UK.
Sports (Basel). 2018 Feb 12;6(1):13. doi: 10.3390/sports6010013.
(1) Background: Differential RPE (dRPE) separates scores for breathlessness (RPE-B), leg muscle exertion (RPE-L) and technical/cognitive exertion (RPE-T). Limited information for dRPE is available in soccer match play, yet these measurements may help inform practitioners training and recovery strategies. This preliminary study investigated the effects of playing position and contextual factors on elite soccer players' dRPE. (2) Methods: Thirty-two male English Premier League players recorded dRPE scores 15⁻30 min post-match for RPE-B, RPE-L, and RPE-T. Data were analysed using linear mixed models, with magnitude-based inferences subsequently applied. (3) Results: Overall, the mean ± SD for the dRPE were 63 ± 23 arbitrary units (au) (RPE-B), 67 ± 22 au (RPE-L), and 60 ± 24 au (RPE-T). Full Backs reported substantially higher RPE-B, RPE-L and RPE-T when compared to all other positions. Substantially higher RPE-T scores were reported for matches played against Top teams compared to Bottom (10 au; 90% Confidence Interval 5 to 15 au) and Middle (10 au; 4 to 15 au) ranked teams. The effects of match result and location on dRPE were not substantial. (4) Conclusions: Positional differences were observed following soccer match play for RPE-B, RPE-L and RPE-T. Full backs had substantially higher dRPE then any other position, with all players reporting increased RPE-T when playing teams at the Top of the league. These findings can help practitioners monitor internal load responses and support the prescription of training and recovery sessions.
(1) 背景:差异主观用力程度评分(dRPE)将呼吸困难主观用力程度评分(RPE - B)、腿部肌肉用力主观用力程度评分(RPE - L)以及技术/认知用力主观用力程度评分(RPE - T)区分开来。在足球比赛中,关于dRPE的信息有限,但这些测量可能有助于为从业者提供训练和恢复策略方面的信息。这项初步研究调查了比赛位置和情境因素对精英足球运动员dRPE的影响。(2) 方法:32名英超男性球员在赛后15 - 30分钟记录了RPE - B、RPE - L和RPE - T的dRPE评分。使用线性混合模型对数据进行分析,随后应用基于量级的推断。(3) 结果:总体而言,dRPE的平均值±标准差分别为63±23任意单位(au)(RPE - B)、67±22 au(RPE - L)和60±24 au(RPE - T)。与所有其他位置相比,边后卫报告的RPE - B、RPE - L和RPE - T显著更高。与排名靠后的球队(10 au;90%置信区间5至15 au)和排名中等的球队(10 au;4至15 au)相比,与顶级球队比赛时报告的RPE - T得分显著更高。比赛结果和比赛地点对dRPE的影响不显著。(4) 结论:足球比赛后,在RPE - B、RPE - L和RPE - T方面观察到了位置差异。边后卫的dRPE显著高于其他任何位置,所有球员在与联赛顶级球队比赛时报告的RPE - T都有所增加。这些发现可以帮助从业者监测内部负荷反应,并为训练和恢复课程的安排提供支持。