• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑销售努力和风险规避的 CVaR 准则下的 NEV 供应链协调与可持续性。

NEV supply chain coordination and sustainability considering sales effort and risk aversion under the CVaR criterion.

机构信息

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 18;13(6):e0199005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199005. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0199005
PMID:29912926
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6005517/
Abstract

In a two-echelon new energy vehicle (NEV) supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral manufacturer and a risk-averse retailer, the coordination and sustainability problem is investigated. The risk-averse retailer, who makes sales effort and undertakes the incurred effort cost, decides the order quantity and sales effort level under the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) criterion. We derive the optimal centralized decisions of a vertically integrated supply chain where the retailer is owned by the manufacturer. Taking such a centralized case as the benchmark, we prove that the subsidy-sharing-based wholesale price (SS-WP) contract fails to coordinate the NEV supply chain under the decentralized case where the retailer makes decisions independently. Then we design a subsidy-sharing-based sales rebate/penalty (SS-SRP) contract and derive the contract parameters to achieve coordination. We evaluate the coordination efficiency of this contract and find that a well-designed SS-SRP contract can promote the NEV sales and lead to a Pareto-improving win-win situation for both the NEV manufacturer and retailer compared to the non-coordination case. A series of numerical experiments are carried out to compare the effects of significant parameters under the SS-WP and SS-SRP contract and provide additional observations and implications, including an indication of the necessary conditions to sustainably maintain the NEV supply chain.

摘要

在一个由风险中性制造商和风险厌恶零售商组成的两级新能源汽车(NEV)供应链中,研究了协调和可持续性问题。风险厌恶的零售商进行销售努力并承担由此产生的努力成本,根据条件风险价值(CVaR)准则决定订单数量和销售努力水平。我们推导出零售商为制造商所有的垂直整合供应链的最优集中决策。以这样一个集中的案例作为基准,我们证明了在零售商独立决策的分散情况下,基于补贴分享的批发价格(SS-WP)合同无法协调 NEV 供应链。然后,我们设计了基于补贴分享的销售回扣/罚款(SS-SRP)合同,并推导出了实现协调的合同参数。我们评估了该合同的协调效率,并发现与非协调情况相比,设计良好的 SS-SRP 合同可以促进 NEV 的销售,并为 NEV 制造商和零售商带来帕累托改进的双赢局面。进行了一系列数值实验,比较了 SS-WP 和 SS-SRP 合同下显著参数的效果,并提供了其他观察结果和启示,包括维持 NEV 供应链可持续性的必要条件的指示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/399e74cb5965/pone.0199005.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/64f71775a905/pone.0199005.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/65ae5c14a2c7/pone.0199005.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/86a80e880cc5/pone.0199005.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/1d19d3f9f23b/pone.0199005.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/acd4cbf44cfa/pone.0199005.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/0e19ed2b94b8/pone.0199005.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/48d54e270e51/pone.0199005.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/399e74cb5965/pone.0199005.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/64f71775a905/pone.0199005.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/65ae5c14a2c7/pone.0199005.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/86a80e880cc5/pone.0199005.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/1d19d3f9f23b/pone.0199005.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/acd4cbf44cfa/pone.0199005.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/0e19ed2b94b8/pone.0199005.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/48d54e270e51/pone.0199005.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ce/6005517/399e74cb5965/pone.0199005.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
NEV supply chain coordination and sustainability considering sales effort and risk aversion under the CVaR criterion.考虑销售努力和风险规避的 CVaR 准则下的 NEV 供应链协调与可持续性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 18;13(6):e0199005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199005. eCollection 2018.
2
Coordinating a supply chain with a loss-averse retailer and effort dependent demand.协调一个包含厌恶损失零售商和努力依赖需求的供应链。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:231041. doi: 10.1155/2014/231041. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
3
Coordinating a three-level contract farming supply chain with option contracts considering risk-averse farmer and retailer.考虑风险厌恶型农户和零售商的三级期权契约型合同农业供应链协调
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0279115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279115. eCollection 2023.
4
Optimal control of carbon emission reduction strategies in supply chain with wholesale price and consignment contract.供应链中批发价格和寄售合同下的碳减排策略的最优控制。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(43):61707-61722. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15080-1. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Research on supply chain performance based on retailers' fairness concerns: Wholesale prices versus cost sharing of efforts.基于零售商公平关切的供应链绩效研究:批发价格与努力成本分担。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0204482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204482. eCollection 2018.
6
Energy-saving and pricing decisions in a sustainable supply chain considering behavioral concerns.考虑行为因素的可持续供应链中的节能与定价决策。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 4;15(8):e0236354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236354. eCollection 2020.
7
Pricing and coordination in a dual-channel supply chain with a socially responsible manufacturer.具有社会责任的制造商的双渠道供应链中的定价与协调。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0236099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236099. eCollection 2020.
8
Supply chain decision based on green investment subsidy and risk aversion.基于绿色投资补贴和风险规避的供应链决策。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 6;18(11):e0293924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293924. eCollection 2023.
9
Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract.不同权力结构下的绿色供应链决策:批发价与收益共享合同。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217737.
10
Retailer Stackelberg game in a supply chain with pricing and service decisions and simple price discount contract.供应链中具有定价和服务决策的零售商 Stackelberg 博弈与简单价格折扣契约
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195109. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Supply chain decision based on green investment subsidy and risk aversion.基于绿色投资补贴和风险规避的供应链决策。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 6;18(11):e0293924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293924. eCollection 2023.
2
Energy-saving and pricing decisions in a sustainable supply chain considering behavioral concerns.考虑行为因素的可持续供应链中的节能与定价决策。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 4;15(8):e0236354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236354. eCollection 2020.