• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010-2015: a qualitative content analyses.2010 - 2015年丹麦南部地区精神病学临床伦理委员会评估的伦理挑战:一项定性内容分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 19;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0308-z.
2
Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice.医院伦理反思小组:临床实践的学习与发展资源。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 24;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0415-5.
3
Global mental health, autonomy and medical paternalism: reconstructing the 'French ethical tradition' in psychiatry.全球心理健康、自主性与医学家长主义:重构精神病学中的“法国伦理传统”
Hist Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;28(3):326-343. doi: 10.1177/0957154X17706475. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care.应对伦理挑战:一项针对精神卫生保健专业人员的焦点小组研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jan 16;16:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-16-4.
5
Ethical challenges within Veterans Administration healthcare facilities: perspectives of managers, clinicians, patients, and ethics committee chairpersons.退伍军人管理局医疗设施中的伦理挑战:管理者、临床医生、患者及伦理委员会主席的观点
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):28-36. doi: 10.1080/15265160802716795.
6
Paternalism, autonomy and reciprocity: ethical perspectives in encounters with patients in psychiatric in-patient care.家长主义、自主性和互惠性:精神科住院患者医患关系中的伦理视角。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Dec 6;14:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-49.
7
Prioritising patient care: The different views of clinicians and managers.优先考虑患者护理:临床医生和管理者的不同观点。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Sep;25(6):746-759. doi: 10.1177/0969733016664977. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
8
Ethical deliberations about involuntary treatment: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists.关于非自愿治疗的伦理思考:对瑞典精神科医生的访谈
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 28;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0029-5.
9
[Clinical ethics in psychiatry: the experience at Douglas Hospital].[精神病学中的临床伦理学:道格拉斯医院的经验]
Sante Ment Que. 2006 Spring;31(1):95-105. doi: 10.7202/013687ar.
10
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy.您的机器人治疗师现在为您服务:具身人工智能在精神病学、心理学和心理治疗中的伦理意义。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 9;21(5):e13216. doi: 10.2196/13216.

引用本文的文献

1
The Current State and Challenges of Clinical Ethics Consultation for Prenatal Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Committee Employee Perspectives in China.产前诊断临床伦理咨询的现状与挑战:中国委员会工作人员视角的质性研究
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Sep 5;17(1):73-90. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00303-7. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Preventing burnout from moral distress among prehospital emergency personnel through action research and targeted clinical ethics support.通过行动研究和有针对性的临床伦理支持,预防院前急救人员因道德困扰而产生职业倦怠。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83507-z.
3
Clinical ethics problems in psychiatry and the need for clinical ethics consultation in Japan: A cross-sectional study.日本精神病学中的临床伦理问题及临床伦理咨询的必要性:一项横断面研究。
PCN Rep. 2023 Apr 12;2(2):e86. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.86. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
How prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges: the importance of confidence, trust, and safety.如何让院前急救人员应对伦理挑战:信心、信任和安全的重要性。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 18;25(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01061-9.
5
Ethical considerations in the prehospital treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-centre, qualitative study.院外心脏骤停院前治疗中的伦理考虑:一项多中心定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 26;18(7):e0284826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284826. eCollection 2023.
6
Developing the CARE intervention to enhance ethical self-efficacy in dementia care through the use of literary texts.开发 CARE 干预措施,通过使用文学文本提高痴呆症护理中的伦理自我效能。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 29;24(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00926-9.
7
Challenges of hospital ethics committees: a phenomenological study.医院伦理委员会面临的挑战:一项现象学研究
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2021 Dec 11;14:26. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v14i26.8282. eCollection 2021.
8
Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: a rapid review.定义医疗保健研究中的伦理挑战:快速综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 29;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00700-9.
9
Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice.医院伦理反思小组:临床实践的学习与发展资源。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 24;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0415-5.
10
Implementing ethics reflection groups in hospitals: an action research study evaluating barriers and promotors.在医院实施伦理反思小组:一项评估障碍和促进因素的行动研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 16;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0387-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical challenges when using coercion in mental healthcare: A systematic literature review.精神卫生保健中使用强制手段时的伦理挑战:一项系统的文献综述。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Feb;25(1):92-110. doi: 10.1177/0969733016629770. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
2
Ethics reflection groups in community health services: an evaluation study.社区卫生服务中的伦理反思小组:一项评估研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Apr 17;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0017-9.
3
Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion: a focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care.与使用强制手段相关的伦理挑战:对精神卫生保健领域医护人员的焦点小组研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Dec 4;15:82. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-82.
4
[Perception of ethical aspects in psychiatric patient care: a pilot study].[精神病患者护理中伦理问题的认知:一项试点研究]
Psychiatr Prax. 2014 Oct;41(7):376-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370210. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
5
Do organizational and clinical ethics in a hospital setting need different venues?医院环境中的组织伦理和临床伦理需要不同的讨论场所吗?
HEC Forum. 2014 Jun;26(2):147-58. doi: 10.1007/s10730-014-9237-5.
6
Ethical challenges and how to develop ethics support in primary health care.初级卫生保健中的伦理挑战及如何提供伦理支持。
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Feb;20(1):96-108. doi: 10.1177/0969733012452687. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
7
"Here's my dilemma". Moral case deliberation as a platform for discussing everyday ethics in elderly care.“这是我的困境”。道德案例审议作为老年护理日常伦理讨论的平台。
Health Care Anal. 2012 Sep;20(3):250-67. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0185-9.
8
Clinical ethics committees in Norway: what do they do, and does it make a difference?挪威的临床伦理委员会:它们做什么,又有作用吗?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jul;20(3):389-95. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000077.
9
Barriers and challenges in clinical ethics consultations: the experiences of nine clinical ethics committees.临床伦理咨询中的障碍与挑战:九个临床伦理委员会的经验
Bioethics. 2009 Oct;23(8):460-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00664.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
10
Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation.临床中的伦理教学。道德案例审议的理论与实践。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb;34(2):120-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018580.

2010 - 2015年丹麦南部地区精神病学临床伦理委员会评估的伦理挑战:一项定性内容分析

Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010-2015: a qualitative content analyses.

作者信息

Bruun H, Lystbaek S G, Stenager E, Huniche L, Pedersen R

机构信息

Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Psychiatric hospitals, the Region of Southern Denmark, Toldbodgade 45, 5000, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 19;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0308-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-018-0308-z
PMID:29914461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6006832/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this article is to give more insight into what ethical challenges clinicians in mental healthcare experience and discuss with a Clinical Ethics Committee in psychiatry in the Region of Southern Denmark. Ethical considerations are an important part of the daily decision-making processes and thereby for the quality of care in mental healthcare. However, such ethical challenges have been given little systematic attention - both in research and in practices.

METHODS

A qualitative content analysis of 55 written case-reports from the Clinical Ethics Committee. The Committee offers clinicians in mental healthcare structured ethical analyses of ethical challenges and makes a thorough written case-report.

RESULTS

The ethical challenges are grouped into three overarching topics: 1. Clinicians and their relation to patients and relatives. 2. Clinicians and institutional aspects of mental healthcare 3. Clinicians and mental healthcare in a wider social context. Through presentation of illustrative examples the complexity of daily clinical life in mental healthcare becomes evident, as well as typical interests, values and arguments.

CONCLUSIONS

This qualitative study indicates that difficult ethical challenges are an inherent part of mental healthcare that requires time, space and competence to be dealt with adequately.

摘要

背景

本文旨在更深入地了解精神卫生保健领域的临床医生所面临的伦理挑战,并与丹麦南部地区的精神病学临床伦理委员会进行讨论。伦理考量是日常决策过程的重要组成部分,因此对精神卫生保健的护理质量也很重要。然而,此类伦理挑战在研究和实践中都很少受到系统关注。

方法

对临床伦理委员会的55份书面病例报告进行定性内容分析。该委员会为精神卫生保健领域的临床医生提供对伦理挑战的结构化伦理分析,并撰写详尽的书面病例报告。

结果

伦理挑战分为三个总体主题:1. 临床医生及其与患者和亲属的关系。2. 临床医生与精神卫生保健的机构层面。3. 临床医生与更广泛社会背景下的精神卫生保健。通过展示实例,精神卫生保健日常临床生活的复杂性以及典型的利益、价值观和论据变得显而易见。

结论

这项定性研究表明,棘手的伦理挑战是精神卫生保健的固有组成部分,需要时间、空间和能力才能得到充分应对。