Suppr超能文献

职业篮球运动员的训练能力与投篮表现之间的关系:对静态和动态投篮技术的分析。

Association Between Conditioning Capacities and Shooting Performance in Professional Basketball Players: An Analysis of Stationary and Dynamic Shooting Skills.

机构信息

Department for Health Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.

Mid Sweden University, Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Östersund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jul;32(7):1981-1992. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002100.

Abstract

Pojskic, H, Sisic, N, Separovic, V, and Sekulic, D. Association between conditioning capacities and shooting performance in professional basketball players: an analysis of stationary and dynamic shooting skills. J Strength Cond Res 32(7): 1981-1992, 2018-Little is known about the influence of conditioning capacities on shooting performance in basketball. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between different conditioning capacities and shooting performance in professional basketball players. In this investigation, we examined 38 males (all perimeter players; height: 185.5 ± 6.73 cm; mass: 78.66 ± 10.35 kg). Conditioning capacities were evaluated by tests of muscular strength, aerobic endurance, jumping and throwing capacities, sprinting speed, preplanned agility, anaerobic endurance, and fatigue resistance. Shooting performance was evaluated using game statistics, as well as 6 tests of shooting performance performed in controlled settings: (a) 3 tests of static (i.e., nonfatigued) shooting performance (standardized execution of 1- [S1], 2- [S2] and 3-point shots [S3] in stationary conditions), and (b) 3 tests of dynamic (i.e., fatigued) shooting performance (standardized execution of 1- [D1], 2- (D2), and 3-point shots [D3] in dynamic conditions). All 3 dynamic shooting tests and the S1 test were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) correlated with corresponding game statistics. Multiple regression indicated that conditioning capacities were significantly related to D1 (R = 0.36; p = 0.03), D2 (R = 0.44; p = 0.03), S3 (R = 0.41; p = 0.02), and D3 (R = 0.39; p = 0.03) tests. Players with a higher fatigue resistance achieved better results on the D1 test (β = -0.37, p = 0.03). Preplanned agility (β = -0.33, p = 0.04), countermovement jump (β = 0.42, p = 0.03), and fatigue resistance (β = -0.37, p = 0.02) were significant predictors of D2 performance. The countermovement jump (β = 0.39, p = 0.04), medicine ball toss (β = 0.34, p = 0.04), and anaerobic endurance (β = 0.46, p = 0.04) predicted the results of D3 performance. Jumping, throwing, and anaerobic endurance capacities were good determinants of the skill of dynamic shooting over a long distance. These findings emphasize the importance of explosive power and anaerobic capacity as determinants of shooting performance in high-level basketball players.

摘要

波伊斯基克、H、西斯尼克、N、塞帕罗维奇、V 和塞库利克、D. 专业篮球运动员的训练能力与投篮表现之间的关系:定点和动态投篮技能分析。J 力量与调理研究 32(7):1981-1992,2018-关于训练能力对篮球投篮表现的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨不同训练能力与专业篮球运动员投篮表现之间的关系。在这项研究中,我们研究了 38 名男性(均为外线球员;身高:185.5±6.73cm;体重:78.66±10.35kg)。通过肌肉力量、有氧耐力、跳跃和投掷能力、冲刺速度、预先计划的敏捷性、无氧耐力和抗疲劳能力的测试来评估训练能力。投篮表现通过比赛数据以及在受控环境下进行的 6 项投篮表现测试进行评估:(a)3 项静态(即非疲劳)投篮表现测试(标准执行 1-点[ S1 ]、2 点[S2]和 3 分[S3]投篮)在静止条件下),和(b)3 项动态(即疲劳)投篮表现测试(在动态条件下标准执行 1 点[ D1 ]、2 点[ D2 ]和 3 分[ D3 ]投篮)。所有 3 项动态投篮测试和 S1 测试均与相应的比赛数据显著相关(p≤0.05)。多元回归表明,训练能力与 D1(R=0.36;p=0.03)、D2(R=0.44;p=0.03)、S3(R=0.41;p=0.02)和 D3(R=0.39;p=0.03)测试显著相关。具有较高抗疲劳能力的运动员在 D1 测试中表现更好(β=-0.37,p=0.03)。预先计划的敏捷性(β=-0.33,p=0.04)、反向跳跃(β=0.42,p=0.03)和抗疲劳能力(β=-0.37,p=0.02)是 D2 表现的显著预测因子。反向跳跃(β=0.39,p=0.04)、药球投掷(β=0.34,p=0.04)和无氧耐力(β=0.46,p=0.04)预测了 D3 表现的结果。跳跃、投掷和无氧耐力能力是远距离动态投篮技能的良好决定因素。这些发现强调了爆发力和无氧能力作为高水平篮球运动员投篮表现决定因素的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验