Velasco-Orjuela Gina P, Domínguez-Sanchéz María A, Hernández Enrique, Correa-Bautista Jorge E, Triana-Reina Héctor R, García-Hermoso Antonio, Peña-Ibagon Jhonatan C, Izquierdo Mikel, Cadore Eduardo L, Hackney Anthony C, Ramírez-Vélez Robinson
Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.; Grupo de Investigación Movimiento Corporal Humano, Facultad de Enfermería y Rehabilitación, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia..
Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 1;194:401-409. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.06.034. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
The purpose of this study was to compare the hormonal responses to one session of high-intensity interval training (HIIT, 4 × 4 min intervals at 85-95% maximum heart rate [HRmax], interspersed with 4 min of recovery at 75-85% HRmax), resistance training (RT at 50-70% of one repetition maximum 12-15 repetitions per set with 60s of recovery) or both (HIIT+RT) exercise protocol in a cohort of physical inactivity, overweight adults (age 18-30 years old). Randomized, parallel-group clinical trial among fifty-one men (23.6 ± 3.5 yr; 83.5 ± 7.8 kg; 28.0 ± 1.9 kg/m2), physical inactivity (i.e., <150 min of moderate-intensity exercise per week for >6 months), with abdominal obesity (waist circumference ≥90 cm) or body mass index ≥25 and ≤30 kg/m were randomized to the following 4 groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT, n = 14), resistance training (RT, n = 12), combined high-intensity interval and resistance training (HIIT+RT, n = 13), or non-exercising control (CON, n = 12). Cortisol, total- and free-testosterone and total-testosterone/cortisol-ratio (T/C) assessments (all in serum) were determined before (pre) and 1-min post-exercise for each protocol session. Decreases in cortisol levels were -57.08 (95%CI, -75.58 to -38.58; P = 0.001; ɳ = 0.61) and - 37.65 (95%CI, -54.36 to -20.93; P = 0.001; ɳ = 0.51) in the HIIT and control group, respectively. Increases in T/C ratio were 0.022 (95%CI, 0.012 to 0.031; P = 0.001; ɳ = 0.49) and 0.015 (95%CI, 0.004 to 0.025; P = 0.007; ɳ = 0.29) in the HIIT and control group, respectively. In per-protocol analyses revealed a significant change in cortisol levels [interaction effect F(), ɳ = 0.33] and T/C ratio [interaction effect F(), ɳ = 0.25] between groups over time. Additionally, we showed that in both the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol analyses, HIIT+RT did not change serum cortisol, total or free testosterone. The present data indicate a HIIT reduced cortisol and increased total-testosterone/cortisol-ratio levels significantly in physically inactive adults. Further study is required to determine the biological importance of these changes in hormonal responses in overweight men.
本研究的目的是比较高强度间歇训练(HIIT,以最大心率[HRmax]的85 - 95%进行4×4分钟的间歇训练,穿插以HRmax的75 - 85%进行4分钟恢复)、阻力训练(RT,以一次重复最大值的50 - 70%进行每组12 - 15次重复,每组恢复60秒)或两者结合(HIIT + RT)的运动方案对一组缺乏运动的超重成年人(年龄18 - 30岁)的激素反应。在51名男性(23.6±3.5岁;83.5±7.8千克;28.0±1.9千克/平方米)中进行随机平行组临床试验,这些男性缺乏运动(即每周进行中度强度运动少于150分钟,持续超过6个月),有腹部肥胖(腰围≥90厘米)或体重指数≥25且≤30千克/平方米,被随机分为以下4组:高强度间歇训练组(HIIT,n = 14)、阻力训练组(RT,n = 12)、高强度间歇与阻力训练结合组(HIIT + RT,n = 13)或非运动对照组(CON,n = 12)。在每个方案训练前(pre)和训练后1分钟测定皮质醇、总睾酮和游离睾酮以及总睾酮/皮质醇比值(T/C)(均在血清中)。HIIT组和对照组皮质醇水平的下降分别为-57.08(95%CI,-75.58至-38.58;P = 0.001;ɳ = 0.61)和-37.65(95%CI,-54.36至-20.93;P = 0.001;ɳ = 0.51)。HIIT组和对照组T/C比值的增加分别为0.022(95%CI,0.012至0.031;P = 0.001;ɳ = 0.49)和0.015(95%CI,0.004至0.025;P = 0.007;ɳ = 0.29)。在按方案分析中发现随着时间推移,各群组间皮质醇水平[交互作用F(),ɳ = 0.33]和T/C比值[交互作用F(),ɳ = 0.25]有显著变化。此外,我们表明在意向性分析(ITT)和按方案分析中,HIIT + RT均未改变血清皮质醇、总睾酮或游离睾酮。目前的数据表明,HIIT可显著降低缺乏运动的成年人的皮质醇水平并提高总睾酮/皮质醇比值。需要进一步研究以确定这些激素反应变化在超重男性中的生物学重要性。