Suppr超能文献

三种不同运动训练方式对超重久坐男性执行功能的急性影响:BrainFit研究的二次分析

Acute effect of three different exercise training modalities on executive function in overweight inactive men: A secondary analysis of the BrainFit study.

作者信息

Quintero Andrea P, Bonilla-Vargas Kely Johana, Correa-Bautista Jorge E, Domínguez-Sanchéz María A, Triana-Reina Héctor R, Velasco-Orjuela Gina P, García-Hermoso Antonio, Villa-González Emilio, Esteban-Cornejo Irene, Correa-Rodríguez María, Ramírez-Vélez Robinson

机构信息

Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.

Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2018 Dec 1;197:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

Abstract

There is currently a consensus about the positive effects of physical exercise on cognition. However, the exercise intensity-dependent effect on executive function remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIIT), progressive resistance training (PRT), or combined training (PRT + HIIT) on executive function indicators in overweight inactive adult men (aged 18-30 years old). The participants were screened and excluded for medical conditions known to impact cognitive functioning, which was measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening cognitive test. A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted among 36 adults who were randomly assigned to a HIIT (n = 12), PRT (n = 7), PRT + HIIT (n = 7), or control group (n = 10) until the energy expenditure of 400-500 kcal. Cognitive inhibition and attention capacity were examined using the Stroop test and d2 test of attention, respectively, and were obtained pre-exercise for baseline measurement and 1 min post-exercise for each exercise training modality. Cognitive inhibition measured by the Stroop test was improved after the HIIT protocol for the domains of reading by +5.89 (η = 0.33), colour naming +9.0 (η = 0.60), interference +10.1 (η = 0.39), and index interference +6.0 (η = 0.20). Additionally, the PRT + HIIT group had an increase for the reading condition of +7.1 (η = 0.40), colour naming +7.5 (η = 0.80), and interference +5.8 (η = 0.39). In regard to attentional capacity, the HIIT group elicited small to medium improvements in the concentration level domain of +21.7 (η = 0.44), total performance domain +56.6 (η = 0.50), and consistency domain -3.0 (η = 0.27). These results were similar in the PRT and PRT + HIIT groups in the concentration level and items-processed domains (P < 0.05). In conclusion, acute HIIT and PRT + HIIT sessions reported important effect sizes than PRT alone for cognitive inhibition and attention capacity. Taken together, the results suggest that even short-term exercise interventions can enhance overweight adults' executive functions.

摘要

目前,人们对于体育锻炼对认知的积极影响已达成共识。然而,运动强度对执行功能的影响仍不明确。因此,本研究的目的是比较高强度有氧间歇训练(HIIT)、渐进性抗阻训练(PRT)或联合训练(PRT + HIIT)对超重且缺乏运动的成年男性(18 - 30岁)执行功能指标的急性影响。通过蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)筛查认知测试对参与者进行筛查,排除已知会影响认知功能的疾病。对36名成年人进行了一项随机平行组临床试验,他们被随机分配到HIIT组(n = 12)、PRT组(n = 7)、PRT + HIIT组(n = 7)或对照组(n = 10),直至能量消耗达到400 - 500千卡。分别使用Stroop测试和注意力d2测试来检查认知抑制和注意力容量,并在每次运动训练方式前进行预运动测量以获取基线数据,运动后1分钟进行测量。通过Stroop测试测量的认知抑制在HIIT方案后,阅读领域提高了5.89(η = 0.33),颜色命名提高了9.0(η = 0.60),干扰提高了10.1(η = 0.39),指数干扰提高了6.0(η = 0.20)。此外,PRT + HIIT组在阅读条件下提高了7.1(η = 0.40),颜色命名提高了7.5(η = 0.80),干扰提高了5.8(η = 0.39)。在注意力容量方面,HIIT组在注意力集中水平领域提高了21.7(η = 0.44),总表现领域提高了56.6(η = 0.50),一致性领域降低了3.0(η = 0.27),有小到中等程度的改善。PRT组和PRT + HIIT组在注意力集中水平和处理项目领域的结果相似(P < 0.05)。总之,急性HIIT和PRT + HIIT训练比单独的PRT在认知抑制和注意力容量方面具有更显著的效应量。综上所述,结果表明即使是短期运动干预也可以增强超重成年人的执行功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验