Wilbanks Rebecca
Stanford University.
Engag Sci Technol Soc. 2017;3:180-205. doi: 10.17351/ests2017.53.
Drawing on the case study of Real Vegan Cheese (RVC), a synthetic biology project housed in a community lab or "biohackerspace," I argue that biohacking performs an "artistic critique" of the bioeconomy. Following Boltanski and Chiapello's use of the term, the "artistic critique" pits values of autonomy and creativity against a view of capitalist production as standardized and alienating, represented (in the case of biotechnology) by Monsanto's monoculture GMOs. In this way, biohacking is depicted as liberating biotechnology from the constraints of corporate and academic institutions. Through the use of design fiction and a playful aesthetic, projects such as RVC demonstrate a more legitimate--with respect to the values of the artistic critique--mode of production for a new generation of biotechnology products, one that is portrayed as driven primarily by ethical and aesthetic values rather than the profit motive. This analysis highlights the role that aesthetic and affective strategies play in advancing particular sociotechnical visions, and the way that biohacking projects operate in symbiosis with incumbent institutions even as they define themselves in opposition to them. Finally, it suggests that biohacking has certain limitations when considered as a form of public engagement with science.
以“真正的纯素奶酪”(Real Vegan Cheese,RVC)这一案例研究为例,它是一个设在社区实验室或“生物黑客空间”的合成生物学项目,我认为生物黑客行为对生物经济进行了“艺术批判”。沿用博尔坦斯基(Boltanski)和夏佩罗(Chiapello)对该术语的用法,“艺术批判”将自主性和创造力的价值观与资本主义生产的标准化和异化观点相对立,(在生物技术领域)这种观点以孟山都公司的单一栽培转基因生物为代表。通过这种方式,生物黑客行为被描绘为将生物技术从企业和学术机构的限制中解放出来。通过运用设计虚构和一种趣味美学,像RVC这样的项目展示了一种(就艺术批判的价值观而言)对新一代生物技术产品来说更合理的生产模式,这种模式被描绘为主要由伦理和美学价值而非利润动机驱动。这一分析凸显了美学和情感策略在推进特定社会技术愿景方面所起的作用,以及生物黑客项目即便在将自身定义为与现有机构相对立的情况下,仍与这些机构共生运作的方式。最后,这表明当把生物黑客行为视为公众参与科学的一种形式时,它存在一定的局限性。