Discipline of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Odontology. 2019 Apr;107(2):142-149. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0373-2. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the removal of the smear layer by some commonly used (needle-and-syringe irrigation, sonic activation, ultrasonically activated irrigation) and new root canal irrigation strategies (negative pressure irrigation and polymer rotary file) using a novel approach by comparing pre- and post-experimental images. Prepared root canals (n = 50) were subjected to a split tooth model and divided into 5 groups (n = 10): (1) needle-and-syringe irrigation (control); (2) sonic activation (SA); (3) negative pressure irrigation with continuous warm activated irrigation and evacuation (CWA); (4) polymer finishing file (FF); (5) ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI). Smear layer scores and percentage of open dentinal tubules (%ODT) were evaluated by 2 examiners before and after irrigation procedures, from the middle and apical thirds of the root canal, on scanning electron microscopic images. Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc tests at P = 0.05. Needle-and-syringe irrigation (control) showed no significant difference (both smear score and %ODT) compared to the pre-experimental value (P > 0.05). All other groups showed lower smear scores and higher %ODT, compared to the control (P < 0.05). The lowest smear score and highest %ODT were observed in the CWA group, which was significantly different from all other groups (P < 0.05). SA group showed significantly higher smear scores and lower %ODT than FF or UAI (P < 0.05). CWA showed superior removal of smear layer in the middle and apical thirds of the root canal compared to the other irrigation strategies.
本研究旨在通过比较实验前后的图像,用一种新的方法评估一些常用(针管冲洗、声激活、超声激活冲洗)和新的根管冲洗策略(负压冲洗和聚合物旋转锉)对玷污层的去除效果。将预备好的根管(n=50)置于分体牙模型中,分为 5 组(n=10):(1)针管冲洗(对照组);(2)声激活(SA);(3)连续温热激活冲洗和抽吸的负压冲洗(CWA);(4)聚合物成型锉(FF);(5)超声激活冲洗(UAI)。在冲洗前后,由 2 名检查者使用扫描电子显微镜图像,从根管的中三分之一和根尖三分之一评估玷污层评分和开放牙本质小管百分比(%ODT)。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和事后检验进行数据分析,P=0.05。与实验前相比,针管冲洗(对照组)的玷污层评分和%ODT均无显著差异(P>0.05)。与对照组相比,其他所有组的玷污层评分均较低,%ODT均较高(P<0.05)。CWA 组的玷污层评分最低,%ODT最高,与其他所有组均有显著差异(P<0.05)。SA 组的玷污层评分显著高于 FF 或 UAI 组,%ODT 显著低于 FF 或 UAI 组(P<0.05)。与其他冲洗策略相比,CWA 在根管的中三分之一和根尖三分之一处具有更好的去除玷污层效果。