Belda Beatriz, Petrovitch Nicholas, Mathews Kyle G
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
J Vet Intern Med. 2018 Jul;32(4):1353-1358. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15219. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
Cribriform lysis has been considered a contraindication for topical treatment of sinonasal aspergillosis (SNA) because of concerns about drug extravasation with resultant neurologic signs or death.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To describe dogs with SNA and cribriform plate lysis treated with topical antifungal medications. Our hypothesis was that the conventional dogma that topical therapy should be avoided in these cases is incorrect.
Nine client-owned dogs with SNA and lysis of the cribriform plate, lysis of the floor of a frontal sinus or both detected by computed tomography (CT).
A retrospective review of medical records was performed. Dogs that met inclusion criteria (ie, SNA confirmed by at least 1 laboratory test, braincase affected on CT, and topical treatment applied) were included. Size of lesions, ancillary diagnostic test results, topical therapy, and adjuvant PO treatments were recorded. Outcome was determined by phone calls.
Four dogs were alive at the time of the manuscript submission with follow-up ranging from 188 to 684 days without neurological signs observed. All dogs were discharged without major complication 1-7 days postoperatively. One dog that had presented with a history of seizures experienced seizure activity 2 months after treatment.
Topical therapy did not result in complications in these dogs in which lytic regions as large as 16 × 22 mm were noted. Sinonasal aspergillosis associated lysis of the cribriform plate; lysis of the floor of a frontal sinus or both detected on CT is not necessarily a contraindication to topical therapy.
筛状骨溶解一直被视为鼻-鼻窦曲霉菌病(SNA)局部治疗的禁忌证,因为担心药物外渗会导致神经症状或死亡。
目的/假设:描述采用局部抗真菌药物治疗的患有SNA和筛状板溶解的犬只。我们的假设是,在这些病例中应避免局部治疗的传统观念是错误的。
9只客户拥有的患有SNA且经计算机断层扫描(CT)检测出筛状板溶解、额窦底部溶解或两者皆有的犬只。
对病历进行回顾性研究。纳入符合纳入标准(即至少1项实验室检查确诊为SNA、CT显示颅腔受累且接受了局部治疗)的犬只。记录病变大小、辅助诊断检查结果、局部治疗及辅助口服治疗情况。通过电话随访确定结局。
4只犬在提交本文时存活,随访时间为188至684天,未观察到神经症状。所有犬只术后1 - 7天出院,无重大并发症。1只曾有癫痫发作史的犬在治疗后2个月出现癫痫活动。
在这些观察到溶骨区域达16×22 mm的犬只中,局部治疗未导致并发症。鼻-鼻窦曲霉菌病相关的筛状板溶解、CT显示的额窦底部溶解或两者皆有不一定是局部治疗的禁忌证。