Suppr超能文献

柯克帕特里克对医疗保健教育中模拟与反馈的评估:一项系统评价。

Kirkpatrick's Evaluation of Simulation and Debriefing in Health Care Education: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Johnston Sandra, Coyer Fiona Maree, Nash Robyn

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2018 Jul 1;57(7):393-398. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180618-03.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Simulation is an integral component of health care education. Research suggests a positive relationship between simulation and learning outcomes. Kirkpatrick's framework is a four-level model based on the premise that learning resulting from training programs can be classified into four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. Evaluation of educational impact provides valuable feedback to educators that may assist with development and improvement of teaching methods.

METHOD

This review is based on the PRISMA guidelines for conducting a systematic review. Inclusion criteria included articles (a) written in the English language, (b) published between 2000 and 2016, (c) describing a debriefing intervention after high-fidelity patient simulation, and (d) based in health care.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met criteria for inclusion in the review.

CONCLUSION

Results indicated a paucity of studies at the highest levels of evaluation, indicating an area where future research is needed to assist with the development and improvement of simulation education. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(7):393-398.].

摘要

背景

模拟是医疗保健教育的一个重要组成部分。研究表明模拟与学习成果之间存在积极关系。柯克帕特里克的框架是一个四级模型,其前提是培训项目产生的学习可以分为四个层次:反应、学习、行为和结果。教育影响评估为教育工作者提供了有价值的反馈,这可能有助于教学方法的开发和改进。

方法

本综述基于进行系统综述的PRISMA指南。纳入标准包括:(a)用英语撰写的文章;(b)2000年至2016年期间发表的文章;(c)描述高保真患者模拟后的汇报干预;(d)以医疗保健为基础。

结果

13项研究符合纳入本综述的标准。

结论

结果表明在最高评估水平上的研究较少,这表明未来需要开展研究以协助模拟教育的开发和改进。[《护理教育杂志》。2018年;57(7):393 - 398。]

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验