Suppr超能文献

[珠江三角洲某高校室内灰尘中重金属的含量、来源及健康风险评估]

[Levels, Sources, and Health Risk Assessments of Heavy Metals in Indoor Dust in a College in the Pearl River Delta].

作者信息

Cai Yun-Mei, Huang Han-Shu, Ren Lu-Lu, Zhang Yan-Lin

机构信息

Guangdong Polytechnic of Environmental Protection Engineering, Foshan 528216, China.

State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environment and Resources, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Sep 8;38(9):3620-3627. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201703256.

Abstract

Thirty indoor dust samples were collected from staff and study areas in a college in Foshan, and the As, Hg, Cd, Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb, and Cr contents were measured. The Spearman correlation coefficient, principal component analysis, and US EPA health risk assessment model were used to determine the sources and degree of pollution and the health risks. The results showed that the levels of the eight heavy metals were higher than the background values in Guangdong Province and the reported values in other Chinese cities, excluding Hg. The levels of the eight heavy metals were higher in the staff area than in the study area, but the difference was not significant. The eight heavy metals were derived from similar sources; Hg was mainly derived from outdoor anthropogenic sources, while the others were mainly derived from indoor anthropogenic sources. The daily non-carcinogenic exposure dose was in the following order:ingestion > dermal exposure > inhalation. Ingestion was the major pathway of heavy metal exposure from indoor dust. Except for Cr, the non-carcinogenic hazard indexes of ingestion and dermal exposure were taken from partial sample points > 1. All of the health risks were lower than the average risk thresholds of the heavy metals, and would not cause health risks to humans. Printers, copiers, instruments, and equipment were important sources of indoor pollution and risk sources of heavy metals. Thus, protective measures should be taken to reduce the risk of exposure.

摘要

从佛山某高校的工作人员区域和学习区域采集了30份室内灰尘样本,并测定了其中砷、汞、镉、铜、锌、镍、铅和铬的含量。采用Spearman相关系数、主成分分析和美国环境保护局健康风险评估模型来确定其来源、污染程度和健康风险。结果表明,除汞外,这8种重金属的含量均高于广东省背景值和中国其他城市的报道值。工作人员区域的8种重金属含量高于学习区域,但差异不显著。这8种重金属来源相似;汞主要来源于室外人为源,而其他重金属主要来源于室内人为源。每日非致癌暴露剂量顺序为:经口摄入>皮肤接触>吸入。经口摄入是室内灰尘中重金属暴露的主要途径。除铬外,部分采样点经口摄入和皮肤接触的非致癌危害指数>1。所有健康风险均低于重金属的平均风险阈值,不会对人体造成健康风险。打印机、复印机、仪器和设备是室内污染的重要来源和重金属风险源。因此,应采取防护措施以降低暴露风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验