Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, 511430, China.
Key Laboratory for Repository and Application of Pathogenic Microbiology, Research Center for Pathogens Detection Technology of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, 511430, China.
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9976. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28349-2.
In 2015, an unexpected multiple outbreak of dengue occurred in Guangdong, China. In total, 1,699 cases were reported, of which 1,627 cases were verified to have DENV infections by nucleic acid or NS1 protein, including 44 DENV-1, 1126 DENV-2, 18 DENV-3 and 6 DENV-4, and the other cases were confirmed by NS1 ELISA. Phylogenetic analyses of DENV-1 isolates identified two genotypes (I and V). The predominant DENV-2 outbreak isolates were the Cosmopolitan genotypes, which likely originated from Malaysia. The DENV-3 isolates were assigned into genotype I and genotype III. All 6 DENV-4 isolates from imported cases were likely originally from Cambodia, Thailand and the Philippines. The entomological surveillance showed a moderate risk for the BI index in Chaozhou and Foshan and a low risk in Guangzhou. The imported cases were mostly detected in Guangzhou and Foshan. Surprisingly, the most serious outbreak occurred in Chaozhou, but not in Guangzhou or Foshan. A combined analyses demonstrated the multiple geographical origins of this outbreak, and highlight the detection of suspected cases after the alerting of imported cases, early implementation of control policies and reinforce the vector surveillance strategies were the key points in the chain of prevention and control of dengue epidemics.
2015 年,中国广东省发生了一次意外的登革热多暴发疫情。共报告了 1699 例病例,其中 1627 例经核酸或 NS1 蛋白证实为 DENV 感染,包括 44 例 DENV-1、1126 例 DENV-2、18 例 DENV-3 和 6 例 DENV-4,其余病例由 NS1 ELISA 证实。DENV-1 分离株的系统进化分析确定了两个基因型(I 和 V)。主要的 DENV-2 暴发分离株为世界性基因型,可能源自马来西亚。DENV-3 分离株被分为基因型 I 和基因型 III。6 例输入性 DENV-4 分离株均可能源自柬埔寨、泰国和菲律宾。媒介监测显示,潮州市和佛山市的 BI 指数存在中度风险,广州市则为低度风险。输入性病例主要在广州市和佛山市发现。令人惊讶的是,疫情最严重的是潮州市,而不是广州市或佛山市。综合分析表明,此次暴发存在多个地理来源,强调了在输入性病例发出警报后对疑似病例的检测,以及早期实施控制政策和加强媒介监测策略是登革热疫情防控链中的关键要点。