• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管闭锁新生儿的保留肌肉与标准后外侧开胸术对比研究

MUSCLE-SPARING VERSUS STANDARD POSTEROLATERAL THORACOTOMY IN NEONATES WITH ESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA.

作者信息

Askarpour Shahnam, Peyvasteh Mehran, Ashrafi Amir, Dehdashtian Masoud, Malekian Arash, Aramesh Mohammad-Reza

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital.

Department of Neonatalogy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Khouzestan, Iran.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018;31(2):e1365. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1365. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1590/0102-672020180001e1365
PMID:29972393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6044202/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The muscle-sparing thoracotomy (MST) has not yet been thoroughly studied and assessed in comparison to the traditional thoracotomy method in newborns.

AIM

To compare the outcomes of MST and standard posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT) in newborns.

METHODS

Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial on 40 neonates with esophageal atresia, comparing the time of beginning a surgery until seeing the pleura, the duration of hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit, the time in ventilator, the time of returning the shoulder function, the time of returning the Moro reflex, and the mortality between the two techniques.

RESULTS

The data showed no differences between the two groups in basic information (weight, height, gender, numbers of prematurity neonates and caesarean). The results on the size of the scar in the MST group was significantly lower than in the PLT group. Also, the time of returning the shoulder function in MST group was earlier than in PLT group. There were no significant differences in the duration since the beginning the surgery to see the pleura, the time of being hospitalized in intensive unit, the time that the infant required ventilator, returning time of the Moro reflex in 1st and 3rd months after the operation, and the mortality rates between MST and PLT groups.

CONCLUSION

It seems that the advantages of using MST over PLT procedure in neonates include the earlier shoulder function recovery and also superior cosmetic results.

摘要

背景

与传统开胸手术方法相比,保留肌肉开胸术(MST)在新生儿中的研究和评估尚未充分。

目的

比较新生儿MST和标准后外侧开胸术(PLT)的手术效果。

方法

对40例食管闭锁新生儿进行随机、对照、双盲试验,比较两种手术从开始手术到见到胸膜的时间、新生儿重症监护病房的住院时间、使用呼吸机的时间、肩部功能恢复时间、拥抱反射恢复时间以及两种技术的死亡率。

结果

数据显示两组在基本信息(体重、身高、性别、早产儿数量和剖宫产数量)方面无差异。MST组的瘢痕大小结果显著低于PLT组。此外,MST组的肩部功能恢复时间早于PLT组。MST组和PLT组在开始手术到见到胸膜的时间、在重症监护病房的住院时间、婴儿需要呼吸机的时间、术后第1个月和第3个月拥抱反射的恢复时间以及死亡率方面无显著差异。

结论

在新生儿中使用MST优于PLT手术的优势似乎包括肩部功能恢复更早以及美容效果更佳。

相似文献

1
MUSCLE-SPARING VERSUS STANDARD POSTEROLATERAL THORACOTOMY IN NEONATES WITH ESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA.食管闭锁新生儿的保留肌肉与标准后外侧开胸术对比研究
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018;31(2):e1365. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1365. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy.食管癌的保留肌肉开胸术:与后外侧开胸术的比较
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1240-1. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
3
Muscle-sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy: a prospective study.保留肌肉的开胸术与后外侧开胸术:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):496-9; discussion 499-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
4
Muscle sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary lobectomy: randomised controlled trial.肺叶切除术中肌肉保留与后外侧开胸手术的对比:随机对照试验
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;11(4):415-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.238840. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
5
The effect of muscle-sparing versus standard posterolateral thoracotomy on pulmonary function, muscle strength, and postoperative pain.保留肌肉的后外侧开胸术与标准后外侧开胸术对肺功能、肌肉力量和术后疼痛的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991 Mar;101(3):394-400; discussion 400-1. doi: 10.1097/00132586-199204000-00044.
6
Does muscle-sparing thoracotomy as opposed to posterolateral thoracotomy result in better recovery?与后外侧开胸手术相比,保留肌肉的开胸手术是否能带来更好的恢复效果?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;16(1):60-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs295. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
7
Muscle-sparing Vertical Thoracotomy in Children and Adolescents.小儿和青少年的肌保护型垂直开胸术
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Oct;59(10):161576. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 May 17.
8
A meta-analysis comparing muscle-sparing and posterolateral thoracotomy.比较保留肌肉和后外侧开胸术的荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Mar;97(3):1093-102. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
9
Analysis of 11 trials comparing muscle-sparing with posterolateral thoracotomy.对11项比较保留肌肉开胸术与后外侧开胸术的试验进行的分析。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jun;62(4):344-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1337445. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
10
Esophageal atresia repair with thoracotomy: the Cincinnati contemporary experience.开胸食管闭锁修复术:辛辛那提当代经验
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2009 Feb;18(1):12-9. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.10.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Children with Esophageal Atresia: Potential Benefits on the Anthropometric Parameters.食管闭锁患儿术后的整骨手法治疗:对人体测量参数的潜在益处。
Pediatr Rep. 2022 Oct 20;14(4):434-443. doi: 10.3390/pediatric14040051.
2
Rings and Slings: Not Such Simple Things.环和吊带:并非如此简单。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Oct;24(10):1495-1503. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01764-8. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Musculoskeletal and Esthetic Complications after Neonatal Thoracotomy: Revisited.新生儿开胸术后的肌肉骨骼和美学并发症:再探讨
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2022 May-Jun;27(3):293-296. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_19_21. Epub 2022 May 12.
4
IS THERE NEURAL AND FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY AFTER CLIP REMOVAL IN CERVICAL EXPERIMENTAL SYMPATHECTOMY?在颈部实验性交感神经切除术的夹闭去除后是否存在神经和功能恢复?
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021 Oct 15;34(2):e1582. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1582. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy.食管癌的保留肌肉开胸术:与后外侧开胸术的比较
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1240-1. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
2
A meta-analysis comparing muscle-sparing and posterolateral thoracotomy.比较保留肌肉和后外侧开胸术的荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Mar;97(3):1093-102. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
3
Muscle sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary lobectomy: randomised controlled trial.肺叶切除术中肌肉保留与后外侧开胸手术的对比:随机对照试验
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;11(4):415-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.238840. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
4
Esophageal atresia repair with thoracotomy: the Cincinnati contemporary experience.开胸食管闭锁修复术:辛辛那提当代经验
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2009 Feb;18(1):12-9. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.10.003.
5
Feasibility of latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior muscle-sparing vertical thoracotomy in general thoracic surgery.背阔肌和前锯肌保留垂直胸廓切开术在普通胸外科手术中的可行性
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2004 Sep;3(3):456-9. doi: 10.1016/j.icvts.2004.01.017.
6
Triple fistula: management of a double tracheoesophageal fistula with a third H-type proximal fistula.三瘘管:合并第三个近端H型瘘管的双气管食管瘘的处理
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Jun;42(6):E1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.11.009.
7
Muscle-sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy: a prospective study.保留肌肉的开胸术与后外侧开胸术:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):496-9; discussion 499-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.012. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
8
Esophageal atresia. Lessons I have learned in a 40-year experience.食管闭锁。我40年经验中的所得。
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Oct;41(10):1635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.07.004.
9
Muscle sparing thoracotomy in pediatric age: a comparative study with standard posterolateral thoracotomy.小儿年龄患者的保留肌肉开胸术:与标准后外侧开胸术的比较研究
Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 Oct;22(10):779-83. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1776-7. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
10
Pain and physical function are similar following axillary, muscle-sparing vs posterolateral thoracotomy.腋下保留肌肉开胸术与后外侧开胸术后的疼痛和身体功能相似。
Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2664-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2664.