Castner Jessica, Mammen Manoj J, Jungquist Carla R, Licata Olivia, Pender John J, Wilding Gregory E, Sethi Sanjay
a The Rockefeller University Heilbrunn Family Center for Research Nursing , New York , NY , USA.
b University at Buffalo , Buffalo , NY , USA.
J Asthma. 2019 Jul;56(7):719-730. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1490753. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
Nighttime wakening with asthma symptoms is a key to assessment and therapy decisions, with no gold standard objective measure. The study aims were to (1) determine the feasibility, (2) explore equivalence, and (3) test concordance of a consumer-based accelerometer with standard actigraphy for measurement of sleep patterns in women with asthma as an adjunct to self-report.
Panel study design of women with poorly controlled asthma from a university-affiliated primary care clinic system was used. We assessed sensitivity and specificity, equivalence and concordance of sleep time, sleep efficiency, and wake counts between the consumer-based accelerometer Fitbit Charge™ and Actigraph wGT3X+. We linked data between devices for comparison both automatically by 24-hour period and manually by sleep segment.
Analysis included 424 938 minutes, 738 nights, and 833 unique sleep segments from 47 women. The fitness tracker demonstrated 97% sensitivity and 40% specificity to identify sleep. Between device equivalence for total sleep time (15 and 42-minute threshold) was demonstrated by sleep segment. Concordance improved for wake counts and sleep efficiency when adjusting for a linear trend.
There were important differences in total sleep time, efficiency, and wake count measures when comparing individual sleep segments versus 24-hour measures of sleep. Fitbit overestimates sleep efficiency and underestimates wake counts in this population compared to actigraphy. Low levels of systematic bias indicate the potential for raw measurements from the devices to achieve equivalence and concordance with additional processing, algorithm modification, and modeling. Fitness trackers offer an accessible and inexpensive method to quantify sleep patterns in the home environment as an adjunct to subjective reports, and require further informatics development.
夜间因哮喘症状醒来是评估和治疗决策的关键,但尚无金标准的客观测量方法。本研究旨在:(1)确定可行性;(2)探索等效性;(3)测试基于消费者的加速度计与标准活动记录仪在测量哮喘女性睡眠模式方面的一致性,作为自我报告的辅助手段。
采用来自大学附属初级保健诊所系统中哮喘控制不佳女性的小组研究设计。我们评估了基于消费者的加速度计Fitbit Charge™与Actigraph wGT3X+之间在睡眠时间、睡眠效率和觉醒次数方面的敏感性和特异性、等效性和一致性。我们通过24小时时间段自动以及按睡眠阶段手动链接设备之间的数据进行比较。
分析包括47名女性的424938分钟、738个夜晚和833个独特的睡眠阶段。健身追踪器识别睡眠的敏感性为97%,特异性为40%。按睡眠阶段显示了设备之间总睡眠时间(15和42分钟阈值)的等效性。调整线性趋势后,觉醒次数和睡眠效率的一致性有所改善。
比较单个睡眠阶段与24小时睡眠测量时,总睡眠时间、效率和觉醒次数测量存在重要差异。与活动记录仪相比,Fitbit在该人群中高估了睡眠效率,低估了觉醒次数。低水平的系统偏差表明,通过额外的处理、算法修改和建模,设备的原始测量有可能实现等效性和一致性。健身追踪器提供了一种在家庭环境中量化睡眠模式的便捷且廉价的方法,作为主观报告的辅助手段,并且需要进一步的信息学开发。