1 School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
2 Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Feb;33(2):225-236. doi: 10.1177/0890117118784228. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
To review enrollment strategies, participation barriers, and program reach of a large, 2-year workplace intervention targeting sedentary behavior.
Cross-sectional, retrospective review.
Twenty-four worksites balanced across academic, industry, and government sectors in Minneapolis/Saint Paul (Minnesota) and Phoenix (Arizona) regions.
Full-time (≥30+ h/wk), sedentary office workers.
Reach was calculated as the proportion of eligible employees who enrolled in the intervention ([N enrolled/(proportion of eligible employees × N total employees)] × 100). Mean (1 standard deviation) and median worksite sizes were calculated at each enrollment step. Participation barriers and modifications were recorded by the research team. A survey was sent to a subset of nonparticipants (N = 57), and thematic analyses were conducted to examine reasons for nonparticipation, positive impacts, and negative experiences.
Employer reach was 65% (56 worksites invited to participate; 66% eligible of 56 responses; 24 enrolled). Employee reach was 58% (1317 invited to participate, 83% eligible of 906 responses; 632 enrolled). Postrandomization, on average, 59% (15%) of the worksites participated. Eighteen modifications were developed to overcome participant-, context-, and research-related participation barriers.
A high proportion of worksites and employees approached to participate in a sedentary behavior reduction intervention engaged in the study. Interventions that provide flexible enrollment, graded participant engagement options, and adopt a participant-centered approach may facilitate workplace intervention success.
回顾一项针对久坐行为的大型、为期两年的工作场所干预措施的招募策略、参与障碍和项目覆盖范围。
横断面、回顾性研究。
明尼阿波利斯/圣保罗(明尼苏达州)和凤凰城(亚利桑那州)地区的 24 个工作场所平衡分布在学术、工业和政府部门。
全职(≥30+ 小时/周)、久坐的办公室工作人员。
参与障碍和修改由研究团队记录。向一组非参与者(N=57)发送了一份调查,并进行了主题分析,以检查非参与的原因、积极影响和负面体验。
雇主的覆盖范围为 65%(56 个工作场所受邀参与;56 个响应中 66%符合条件;24 个参与)。员工的覆盖范围为 58%(1317 人受邀参与,906 人响应中 83%符合条件;632 人参与)。随机分组后,平均有 59%(15%)的工作场所参与。制定了 18 项修改措施,以克服参与者、环境和研究相关的参与障碍。
大量的工作场所和员工参与了久坐行为减少干预的研究。提供灵活的注册、分级的参与者参与选项并采用以参与者为中心的方法的干预措施可能有助于促进工作场所干预的成功。