• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国劳动者的社会人口学、职业和工作组织特征与工作场所健康促进计划的提供和参与情况。

Availability of and Participation in Workplace Health Promotion Programs by Sociodemographic, Occupation, and Work Organization Characteristics in US Workers.

机构信息

1 Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluation and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, OH, USA.

2 Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2019 Sep;33(7):1028-1038. doi: 10.1177/0890117119844478. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1177/0890117119844478
PMID:31014070
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine how the availability of and participation in workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) vary as a function of sociodemographic, occupation, and work organization characteristics.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

2015 National Health Interview Survey and Occupational Health Supplement.

PARTICIPANTS

The study sample included 17 469 employed adults who completed the WHPP questions.

MEASURES

The 2 dependent outcome measures were availability of WHPPs and participation in these programs when available. Independent variables included occupation and 8 work organization and employment characteristics: company size, hours worked, supervisory responsibility, hourly pay, paid sick leave, health insurance offered by employer, work schedule, and work arrangement.

ANALYSIS

Poisson regression analyses were conducted with SUDAAN 11.0.1.

RESULTS

Overall, 57.8% of 46.6% employees who have WHPPs available reported participating in these programs. This study found that adults who worked ≤20 h/wk, worked regular night shifts, were paid by the hour, or worked for temporary agencies were less likely to participate in WHPPs. Workers who supervised others were 13% more likely to participate than nonsupervisors. Borderline associations were seen for having access to employer-sponsored health insurance and working at a site with <10 employees.

CONCLUSION

Despite the potential for improving physical and mental health, only 58% of US workers participated in WHPPs. Since barriers to WHPP participation (eg, time constraints, lack of awareness, and no perceived need) may vary across occupations and work organization characteristics, employers should tailor WHPPs based on their specific work organization characteristics to maximize participation.

摘要

目的

研究工作场所健康促进计划(WHPP)的提供情况和参与情况如何随社会人口统计学、职业和工作组织特征的变化而变化。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

2015 年全国健康访谈调查和职业健康补充调查。

参与者

研究样本包括完成 WHPP 问题的 17469 名在职成年人。

测量方法

两个依赖的结果测量指标是 WHPP 的可用性和在 WHPP 可用时参与这些计划的情况。自变量包括职业和 8 个工作组织和就业特征:公司规模、工作时间、监督责任、时薪、带薪病假、雇主提供的健康保险、工作时间表和工作安排。

分析

使用 SUDAAN 11.0.1 进行泊松回归分析。

结果

总体而言,57.8%的 46.6%有 WHPP 可用的员工报告参与了这些计划。本研究发现,每周工作≤20 小时、上固定夜班、按小时计酬或为临时机构工作的成年人参与 WHPP 的可能性较低。监督他人的员工比非监督者更有可能参与。与雇主赞助的健康保险和在员工人数<10 的工作场所工作有关联。

结论

尽管工作场所健康促进计划有可能改善身心健康,但只有 58%的美国工人参与了 WHPP。由于 WHPP 参与的障碍(例如时间限制、缺乏意识和没有感知到的需求)可能因职业和工作组织特征而异,雇主应根据其特定的工作组织特征调整 WHPP,以最大限度地提高参与度。

相似文献

1
Availability of and Participation in Workplace Health Promotion Programs by Sociodemographic, Occupation, and Work Organization Characteristics in US Workers.美国劳动者的社会人口学、职业和工作组织特征与工作场所健康促进计划的提供和参与情况。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Sep;33(7):1028-1038. doi: 10.1177/0890117119844478. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
2
Workforce Characteristics and Attitudes Regarding Participation in Worksite Wellness Programs.关于参与工作场所健康计划的劳动力特征和态度。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Sep;31(5):391-400. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140613-QUAN-283. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
3
Employee Sleep Enhancement and Fatigue Reduction Programs: Analysis of the 2017 CDC Workplace Health in America Poll.员工睡眠改善和疲劳缓解计划:2017 年美国疾病预防控制中心职场健康调查分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 May;35(4):503-513. doi: 10.1177/0890117120969091. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
4
Organizational-level determinants of participation in workplace health promotion programs: a cross-company study.组织层面决定因素对参与工作场所健康促进计划的影响:一项跨公司研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 6;19(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6578-7.
5
Study of nonparticipation in an employee diabetes program.员工糖尿病项目参与情况研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012 Sep-Oct;52(5):e105-8. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.10089.
6
Employment-based health benefits: analysis of the April 1993 Current Population Survey.基于就业的健康福利:对1993年4月当前人口调查的分析。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1994 Aug(152):1-50.
7
Attendance barriers experienced by female health care workers voluntarily participating in a multi-component health promotion programme at the workplace.女性医护人员参与工作场所多组分健康促进计划时遇到的出勤障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):1340. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6254-3.
8
Results of the Workplace Health in America Survey.美国职场健康调查结果。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jun;33(5):652-665. doi: 10.1177/0890117119842047. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Job Characteristics Associated With Self-Rated Fair or Poor Health Among U.S. Workers.美国劳动者自评健康状况一般或较差与工作特征的关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):216-224. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 May 8.
10
Does Availability of Worksite Supports for Physical Activity Differ by Industry and Occupation?工作场所对身体活动的支持是否因行业和职业而异?
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):517-526. doi: 10.1177/0890117116668795. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of workforce characteristics and monetary incentives on uptake of health and wellbeing initiatives in the United Kingdom.劳动力特征和金钱激励措施对英国健康与福祉倡议采纳情况的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 17;5(3):e0003984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003984. eCollection 2025.
2
In or out of reach? Long-term trends in the reach of health assessments in the Swedish occupational setting.是否可及?瑞典职业环境中健康评估覆盖范围的长期趋势。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Dec 1;50(8):641-652. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4192. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
Effect of a smartphone self-management digital support system for low-back pain (selfBACK) among workers with high physical work demands - secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
高体力工作需求工人的腰背疼痛智能手机自我管理数字支持系统(selfBACK)的效果 - 一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Dec 1;50(8):613-621. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4186. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
The Potentials of Digital Workplace Health Promotion.数字工作场所健康促进的潜力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 10;21(7):902. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070902.
5
An urgent call to address work-related psychosocial hazards and improve worker well-being.呼吁紧急解决工作相关的心理社会危害,改善工人福祉。
Am J Ind Med. 2024 Jun;67(6):499-514. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23583. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
6
Perceived Factors Influencing Blue-Collar Workers' Participation in Worksite Health Promotion Programs in Freight Transport: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B.影响货运行业蓝领工人参与工作场所健康促进项目的感知因素:一项运用理论域框架(TDF)和能力、机会、动机行为模型(COM-B)的定性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 21;21(1):116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010116.
7
Factors associated with blue-collar workers' participation in Worksite Health Promotion Programs: a scoping literature review.与蓝领工人参与工作场所健康促进计划相关的因素:范围界定文献综述。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad052.
8
Is It Time to Re-Shift the Research Agenda? A Scoping Review of Participation Rates in Workplace Health Promotion Programs.是时候重新调整研究议程了吗?工作场所健康促进计划参与率的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;20(3):2757. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032757.
9
Evaluation of the communication strategy for promoting physical activity in a cross-company network in Germany: A mixed-methods analysis.评估德国跨公司网络中促进身体活动的沟通策略:混合方法分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;10:905451. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905451. eCollection 2022.
10
Cross-Regional Research in Demographic Impact on Safety Consciousness and Safety Citizenship Behavior of Construction Workers: A Comparative Study between Mainland China and Hong Kong.跨区域研究:人口统计学对建筑工人安全意识和安全公民行为的影响——中国大陆与香港的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;19(19):12799. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912799.