Suppr超能文献

职业伤害与安全健康信息提供之间的关系:来自第四次韩国工作条件调查的数据

Relationship between occupational injuries and the provision of safety and health information: data from the 4th Korean working conditions survey.

作者信息

Seo Ju-Il, Shin Gab-Sik, Kim Min Gi, Min Young-Sun

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Gyeongju-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ann Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jun 4;30:36. doi: 10.1186/s40557-018-0247-7. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the provision of safety and health information (PSHI) and occupational injuries.

METHODS

This study was based on data from the 4th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS) (2014). The sample consisted of data from 24,527 wage workers and was divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, depending on the probability of occupational injury. The high-risk group included subjects who could cause harm to themselves or others due to errors during work. We applied chi-squared tests and logistic regression analyses to examine the relationship between PSHI and occupational injuries.

RESULTS

In the high-risk group, workers with no PSHI showed an adjusted odds ratio of 1.81 for occupational injury (95% CI 1.33-2.47). In contrast, there was no statistically significant relationship between PSHI and the incidence of occupational injury in the low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

To prevent occupational injuries, multi-faceted approaches that take different levels of injury risk into account are needed. Among workers with a high risk of occupational injury, more a stringent safety education program is required.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨安全与健康信息提供(PSHI)与职业伤害之间的关系。

方法

本研究基于第四次韩国工作条件调查(KWCS)(2014年)的数据。样本包括24,527名工薪族的数据,并根据职业伤害的可能性分为高风险组和低风险组。高风险组包括那些在工作期间因失误可能对自己或他人造成伤害的受试者。我们应用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析来研究PSHI与职业伤害之间的关系。

结果

在高风险组中,未接受PSHI的工人职业伤害的调整后优势比为1.81(95%置信区间1.33 - 2.47)。相比之下,低风险组中PSHI与职业伤害发生率之间没有统计学上的显著关系。

结论

为预防职业伤害,需要采取考虑不同伤害风险水平的多方面方法。在职业伤害风险高的工人中,需要更严格的安全教育计划。

相似文献

4
5
Association of work-life balance with occupational injury and work-related musculoskeletal pain among Korean workers.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jun 30;32:e20. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e20. eCollection 2020.
6
The association between perceived discriminations and well-being in Korean employed workers: the 4th Korean working conditions survey.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct 2;29:46. doi: 10.1186/s40557-017-0205-9. eCollection 2017.
7
Association between night work and cardiovascular diseases: analysis of the 3rd Korean working conditions survey.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2015 May 11;27:15. doi: 10.1186/s40557-015-0064-1. eCollection 2015.
8
Association between sleep disturbance and occupational injury among Korean employees.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2021 Sep 10;33:e29. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2021.33.e29. eCollection 2021.
9
Relationship between fatigue severity scale and occupational injury in Korean workers.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2021 May 4;33:e15. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2021.33.e15. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

2
Effects of Emotional Labor Factors and Working Environment on the Risk of Depression in Pink-Collar Workers.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 19;17(14):5208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145208.

本文引用的文献

1
The association between blood lead levels and cardiovascular diseases among lead-exposed male workers.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Jul 1;43(4):385-390. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3631. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
2
Occupational Injuries in Germany: Population-Wide National Survey Data Emphasize the Importance of Work-Related Factors.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148798. eCollection 2016.
3
Occupational and non-occupational factors associated with work-related injuries among construction workers in the USA.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015;21(2):142-50. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000107.
4
Age, occupational demands and the risk of serious work injury.
Occup Med (Lond). 2014 Dec;64(8):571-6. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqu125. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
8
Are occupational factors and mental difficulty associated with occupational injury?
J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Dec;53(12):1452-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318237a14b.
9
Shift work trends and risk of work injury among Canadian workers.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011 Jan;37(1):54-61. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3124. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
10
Work, obesity, and occupational safety and health.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Mar;97(3):428-36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.086900. Epub 2007 Jan 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验