Kim Sung-Kyung, Kim Hyocher, Lee Kyungsuk, Kang Hee-Tae, Oh Sung-Soo, Ko Sang Baek
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian's Hospital, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jan 3;26(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2052-4374-26-1.
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the total injury experience rate and socioeconomic status based on the fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).
By analyzing data from the fourth KNHANES conducted from 2007 to 2009, we estimated the injury experience rate according to socioeconomic status, including the occupational characteristics of 11,837 subjects. Setting the injury experience rate as a dependent variable and socioeconomic status as an independent variable, we performed logistic regression to calculate odds ratios reflecting the likelihood of injury according to socioeconomic status while controlling for relevant covariates.
In 797 subjects who had injury experience over the past 1 year, 290 persons (36.4%) had a work-related injury. As their income, home value, and educational status increased, their injury experiences decreased. Among occupational groups, the craft, equipment, machine operating, and assembling workers showed the highest rate (10.6%) of injury experience, and the lowest rate (5.7%) was found in the unemployed group. After adjusting for the confounding variables, the experience of injury was significantly related to several socioeconomic factors: high income (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34-0.86), high home value (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.96), low education status (OR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.07-1.52), and specific occupations such as craft, equipment, machine operating, and assembling work (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.60-2.47), skilled agriculture, forestry and fishery work (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.02-2.01), and simple labor (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.82).
The injury experience rate differed depending on the socioeconomic status. A negative correlation was found between the injury experience rate and income, low home value, and education level. Moreover, a higher rate of injury experience was found in occupation groups and physical worker groups in comparison to the unemployed group and white-collar worker groups. This study would be useful in selecting appropriate priorities for injury management in Korea.
本研究旨在基于第四次韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(KNHANES),探讨总伤害经历率与社会经济地位之间的关系。
通过分析2007年至2009年进行的第四次KNHANES的数据,我们根据社会经济地位估算了11837名受试者的伤害经历率,包括职业特征。将伤害经历率作为因变量,社会经济地位作为自变量,我们进行了逻辑回归,以计算在控制相关协变量的情况下,反映根据社会经济地位受伤可能性的比值比。
在过去1年有伤害经历的797名受试者中,290人(36.4%)有与工作相关的伤害。随着他们的收入、房屋价值和教育程度的提高,他们的伤害经历减少。在职业群体中,手工艺、设备、机器操作和装配工人的伤害经历率最高(10.6%),失业群体的伤害经历率最低(5.7%)。在对混杂变量进行调整后,伤害经历与几个社会经济因素显著相关:高收入(比值比=0.54;95%置信区间:0.34 - 0.86)、高房屋价值(比值比=0.65;95%置信区间:0.43 - 0.96)、低教育程度(比值比=1.28;95%置信区间:1.07 - 1.52)以及特定职业,如手工艺、设备、机器操作和装配工作(比值比=1.99;95%置信区间:1.60 - 2.47)、熟练农业、林业和渔业工作(比值比=1.43;95%置信区间:1.02 - 2.01)以及简单劳动(比值比=1.38;95%置信区间:1.04 - 1.82)。
伤害经历率因社会经济地位而异。在伤害经历率与收入、低房屋价值和教育水平之间发现了负相关。此外,与失业群体和白领群体相比,职业群体和体力劳动者群体的伤害经历率更高。本研究将有助于为韩国伤害管理选择合适的优先事项。