Suppr超能文献

基于第四次韩国国民健康与营养检查调查的伤害与社会经济地位之间的关系

The Relationship between Injury and Socioeconomic Status in Reference to the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

作者信息

Kim Sung-Kyung, Kim Hyocher, Lee Kyungsuk, Kang Hee-Tae, Oh Sung-Soo, Ko Sang Baek

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian's Hospital, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jan 3;26(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2052-4374-26-1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the relationship between the total injury experience rate and socioeconomic status based on the fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).

METHODS

By analyzing data from the fourth KNHANES conducted from 2007 to 2009, we estimated the injury experience rate according to socioeconomic status, including the occupational characteristics of 11,837 subjects. Setting the injury experience rate as a dependent variable and socioeconomic status as an independent variable, we performed logistic regression to calculate odds ratios reflecting the likelihood of injury according to socioeconomic status while controlling for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

In 797 subjects who had injury experience over the past 1 year, 290 persons (36.4%) had a work-related injury. As their income, home value, and educational status increased, their injury experiences decreased. Among occupational groups, the craft, equipment, machine operating, and assembling workers showed the highest rate (10.6%) of injury experience, and the lowest rate (5.7%) was found in the unemployed group. After adjusting for the confounding variables, the experience of injury was significantly related to several socioeconomic factors: high income (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34-0.86), high home value (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.96), low education status (OR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.07-1.52), and specific occupations such as craft, equipment, machine operating, and assembling work (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.60-2.47), skilled agriculture, forestry and fishery work (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.02-2.01), and simple labor (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The injury experience rate differed depending on the socioeconomic status. A negative correlation was found between the injury experience rate and income, low home value, and education level. Moreover, a higher rate of injury experience was found in occupation groups and physical worker groups in comparison to the unemployed group and white-collar worker groups. This study would be useful in selecting appropriate priorities for injury management in Korea.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在基于第四次韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(KNHANES),探讨总伤害经历率与社会经济地位之间的关系。

方法

通过分析2007年至2009年进行的第四次KNHANES的数据,我们根据社会经济地位估算了11837名受试者的伤害经历率,包括职业特征。将伤害经历率作为因变量,社会经济地位作为自变量,我们进行了逻辑回归,以计算在控制相关协变量的情况下,反映根据社会经济地位受伤可能性的比值比。

结果

在过去1年有伤害经历的797名受试者中,290人(36.4%)有与工作相关的伤害。随着他们的收入、房屋价值和教育程度的提高,他们的伤害经历减少。在职业群体中,手工艺、设备、机器操作和装配工人的伤害经历率最高(10.6%),失业群体的伤害经历率最低(5.7%)。在对混杂变量进行调整后,伤害经历与几个社会经济因素显著相关:高收入(比值比=0.54;95%置信区间:0.34 - 0.86)、高房屋价值(比值比=0.65;95%置信区间:0.43 - 0.96)、低教育程度(比值比=1.28;95%置信区间:1.07 - 1.52)以及特定职业,如手工艺、设备、机器操作和装配工作(比值比=1.99;95%置信区间:1.60 - 2.47)、熟练农业、林业和渔业工作(比值比=1.43;95%置信区间:1.02 - 2.01)以及简单劳动(比值比=1.38;95%置信区间:1.04 - 1.82)。

结论

伤害经历率因社会经济地位而异。在伤害经历率与收入、低房屋价值和教育水平之间发现了负相关。此外,与失业群体和白领群体相比,职业群体和体力劳动者群体的伤害经历率更高。本研究将有助于为韩国伤害管理选择合适的优先事项。

相似文献

4
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
5
Socioeconomic Status and Glaucoma: Associations in High Levels of Income and Education.
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Apr;44(4):436-441. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1548129. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
6
Occupational Differences in C-Reactive Protein Among Working-Age Adults in South Korea.
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Mar;62(3):194-201. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001781.
7
The association between occupational categories and grip strength in Korean male workers.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Apr;94(3):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01635-1. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Considerations for engaging in patient-oriented research with injured workers.
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 4;5:1589643. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1589643. eCollection 2025.
2
Occupational injury prevalence and predictors among small-scale sawmill workers in the Sokoban Wood Village, Kumasi, Ghana.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 10;19(4):e0298954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298954. eCollection 2024.
3
Analysis of injuries and deaths by trauma scores due to occupational accidents.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Sep;28(9):1258-1269. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.22796.
4
Epidemiology of road traffic crashes in Ilam Province, Iran, 2009-2013.
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Nov 10;13(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05366-x.
5
Comparison of work environment and occupational injury in direct and indirect employment in Korea and Europe.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2019 Sep 25;31:e24. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2019.31.e24. eCollection 2019.
9
Environmental, Spatial, and Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Nonfatal Injuries in Indonesia.
J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:5612378. doi: 10.1155/2017/5612378. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
10
Fatigue and on-duty injury among police officers: The BCOPS study.
J Safety Res. 2017 Feb;60:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
[Patterns of unintentional domestic injuries in Korea].
J Prev Med Public Health. 2010 Jan;43(1):84-92. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.1.84.
4
Risk factors for injuries in young children in four developing countries: the Young Lives Study.
Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Oct;11(10):1557-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01708.x.
8
Predictors of work-related injuries and illnesses: national survey findings.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Aug;1(8):542-50. doi: 10.1080/15459620490478376.
9
Psychosocial work characteristics as risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident.
J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jun;46(6):521-7. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000128150.94272.12.
10
Socioeconomic inequalities in injury: critical issues in design and analysis.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:349-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140548. Epub 2001 Oct 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验